Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
60 lines (53 loc) · 5.4 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

60 lines (53 loc) · 5.4 KB

Threat Model Analysis for clap-rs/clap

Threat: Input Validation Bypass

  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious input that bypasses the intended validation rules defined for command-line arguments using clap's features. The attacker provides input that, while seemingly valid to clap's basic parsing, violates the application's intended constraints. This exploits insufficient or incorrect use of clap's validation mechanisms by the developer.
  • Impact:
    • Execution of unintended code paths.
    • Data corruption.
    • Application crashes (e.g., due to unhandled errors resulting from invalid input).
    • Potential for privilege escalation (if the application runs with elevated privileges and the bypassed validation affects security-sensitive parameters). This is what elevates it to critical in some cases.
    • Bypass of security controls.
  • Affected clap Component:
    • Arg::value_parser: Misconfigured or insufficient type validation (e.g., using String when a more specific type is needed).
    • Custom validator functions (implemented by the developer using Arg::validator or Arg::value_parser with a closure): Logic flaws in the custom validation code that allow malicious input to pass.
    • Arg::possible_values: Incomplete or incorrect list of allowed values, allowing unexpected input.
    • Arg::required, Arg::requires, Arg::conflicts_with: Incorrectly defined argument relationships, allowing invalid combinations of arguments that bypass security checks.
    • Arg::default_value, Arg::default_missing_value: Default values that, when combined with other misconfigurations, lead to unexpected or insecure behavior.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the application's context and the consequences of the bypassed validation).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use the most specific value_parser! available.
    • Implement robust, thoroughly tested custom validators.
    • Use possible_values to restrict input to a known-good set.
    • Carefully define argument relationships using required, requires, and conflicts_with.
    • Crucially: Validate input after clap parsing, especially for security-critical parameters. Do not rely solely on clap's validation. This is the key to preventing critical vulnerabilities.
    • Perform comprehensive code review and testing of all argument definitions and validation logic.

Threat: Subcommand Hijacking

  • Description: An attacker injects malicious subcommands into the application's command-line interface. This is only possible if the application dynamically generates its App structure (including subcommands) based on untrusted input – a highly unusual and dangerous practice. This is a direct misuse of clap's API.
  • Impact:
    • Execution of arbitrary code (if the injected subcommand is associated with malicious functionality).
    • Complete application compromise.
  • Affected clap Component:
    • App::subcommand: Dynamic creation of subcommands based on untrusted input. This is the core vulnerability.
    • Any part of the App building process that relies on external, attacker-controlled data.
  • Risk Severity: Critical (if exploitable).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid dynamically generating clap's App structure from untrusted input. This is the primary and most effective mitigation.
    • If dynamic subcommand generation is absolutely unavoidable (highly discouraged), rigorously sanitize and validate the input used to construct the App. Treat it as completely untrusted, applying strict whitelisting and input validation. Assume any input can be malicious.
    • Prefer static App definitions whenever possible. This eliminates the risk entirely.

Threat: Denial of Service (DoS) via Argument Exhaustion

  • Description: An attacker provides an excessive number of arguments, or arguments with extremely large values, causing the application to consume excessive resources (memory, CPU) during the parsing process within clap. This overwhelms the application.
  • Impact:
    • Application unavailability.
    • System instability (if the application consumes excessive resources).
    • Potential for resource exhaustion attacks.
  • Affected clap Component:
    • Arg::max_values, Arg::min_values: Lack of limits on the number of argument occurrences, allowing an attacker to provide many values.
    • Positional arguments (without limits): Vulnerable to an unbounded number of inputs.
    • String arguments (without length limits within clap or custom validators): Vulnerable to excessively large input values.
    • Arg::num_args: If not used to limit the number of values for an argument.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use max_values and min_values to limit the number of occurrences of each argument.
    • Avoid unbounded positional arguments. Use named arguments with limits instead.
    • Implement length limits on string arguments within custom validators or post-parsing checks.
    • Use system-level resource limits (e.g., ulimit on Linux) to prevent the application from consuming excessive resources. This is a defense-in-depth measure.