Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
71 lines (57 loc) · 7.6 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

71 lines (57 loc) · 7.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for cloudflare/pingora

Objective: To compromise the application by exploiting vulnerabilities in Pingora's request handling, routing, or backend communication mechanisms, leading to unauthorized access, data manipulation, or denial of service.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Pingora Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] └── OR ├── Exploit Request Handling Vulnerabilities in Pingora [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └── OR │ ├── HTTP Request Smuggling/Desync [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├── Denial of Service (DoS) via Request Flooding through Pingora [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├── Exploit Backend Communication Vulnerabilities via Pingora [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └── OR │ ├── Backend Authentication/Authorization Bypass [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├── Intercept or manipulate backend traffic [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├── Exploit Pingora Configuration/Management Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └── OR │ ├── Misconfiguration of Pingora [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├── Exploit Dependencies of Pingora [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └── AND │ ├── Identify vulnerable dependencies used by Pingora [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Pingora Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: This is the overarching goal of the attacker. Success at any of the sub-paths leads to achieving this goal. It is critical because it represents the ultimate security objective to defend against.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Request Handling Vulnerabilities in Pingora [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: This critical node represents attacks targeting how Pingora processes incoming HTTP requests. Vulnerabilities here can bypass security controls and directly impact the application. It's a high-risk path because request handling is a core function and often complex.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • HTTP Request Smuggling/Desync [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Exploits discrepancies in how Pingora and backend servers parse HTTP requests, allowing an attacker to "smuggle" requests past Pingora's security checks or desynchronize the request/response flow.
      • Impact: Bypassing security controls, request routing manipulation, cache poisoning, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data manipulation on the backend.
      • Mitigation: Rigorous testing of HTTP parsing logic, ensuring consistent parsing between Pingora and backends, strict HTTP validation, careful connection management.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Request Flooding through Pingora [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Overwhelming Pingora with a flood of requests to exhaust its resources (CPU, memory, connections), making the application unavailable to legitimate users.
      • Impact: Service disruption, application unavailability.
      • Mitigation: Rate limiting, connection limits, resource monitoring, robust error handling, potentially implementing request prioritization or queueing.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Backend Communication Vulnerabilities via Pingora [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: This critical node focuses on vulnerabilities in how Pingora communicates with backend servers. Compromising this communication can lead to backend system access and data breaches. It's a high-risk path because backend communication is often a trusted zone, and breaches here can be severe.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Backend Authentication/Authorization Bypass [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Exploiting weak or misconfigured authentication mechanisms between Pingora and backend servers, or flaws in Pingora's authorization logic, allowing unauthorized access to backend resources.
      • Impact: Unauthorized access to backend systems and data, data breaches, potential for further compromise of backend infrastructure.
      • Mitigation: Strong authentication mechanisms (mutual TLS, API keys), robust authorization policies in Pingora, principle of least privilege, regular credential rotation, security audits of authentication and authorization configurations.
    • Intercept or manipulate backend traffic [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: If backend communication is not properly secured (e.g., using HTTP instead of HTTPS), attackers can intercept and potentially manipulate traffic between Pingora and backend servers.
      • Impact: Data interception, data manipulation, potential for injecting malicious content into backend responses, compromising data integrity and confidentiality.
      • Mitigation: Enforce HTTPS for all communication between Pingora and backend servers, consider mutual TLS for enhanced security, network segmentation to limit exposure of backend traffic.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Pingora Configuration/Management Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: This critical node highlights the risks associated with misconfiguring Pingora itself. Incorrect configurations can directly introduce vulnerabilities. It's a high-risk path because configuration errors are common and can have wide-ranging security implications.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Misconfiguration of Pingora [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Incorrectly configured Pingora settings, such as overly permissive access controls, insecure defaults, or improper routing rules, leading to security weaknesses.
      • Impact: Unintended exposure of backend resources, bypassing security controls, potential for unauthorized access or DoS.
      • Mitigation: Follow security best practices for Pingora configuration, use secure defaults, implement configuration validation and auditing, version control configurations, regular security reviews of Pingora configurations.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Dependencies of Pingora [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: This critical node addresses the risk of vulnerabilities in third-party libraries that Pingora depends on. Exploiting these dependencies can compromise Pingora itself and the application. It's a high-risk path because dependency vulnerabilities are common and can be exploited indirectly.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Identify vulnerable dependencies used by Pingora [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Attackers identify known vulnerabilities in the third-party libraries used by Pingora.
      • Impact: Exploiting dependency vulnerabilities can lead to various impacts, including code execution, DoS, or information disclosure, potentially compromising Pingora and the application.
      • Mitigation: Maintain an up-to-date Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for Pingora's dependencies, regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities using vulnerability scanners, promptly patch or update vulnerable dependencies, implement automated dependency update processes.