Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
86 lines (71 loc) · 10.2 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

86 lines (71 loc) · 10.2 KB

Threat Model Analysis for cloudflare/pingora

Threat: 1. Memory Safety Vulnerability in Pingora Core

  • Threat: Memory Safety Vulnerability in Pingora Core
  • Description: An attacker exploits a critical memory safety bug (e.g., buffer overflow, use-after-free) within Pingora's core Rust code or in unsafe blocks. This could be triggered by sending specially crafted HTTP requests or other interactions that Pingora processes.
  • Impact:
    • Critical: Remote Code Execution (RCE) - Attacker gains complete control of the server running Pingora, allowing them to execute arbitrary code, compromise data, and disrupt services.
    • High: Denial of Service (DoS) - Pingora crashes or becomes unresponsive, leading to service unavailability for all users.
  • Affected Pingora Component: Core Pingora Runtime, Memory Management, Request Handling Logic.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Upstream: Primarily rely on Cloudflare's rigorous security development practices and rapid patching of Pingora. Stay informed about Pingora security advisories and apply updates immediately upon release.
    • Development: If developing custom Pingora extensions or applications with unsafe code, conduct extremely thorough security reviews and audits, focusing on memory safety. Employ extensive memory safety testing and fuzzing techniques.

Threat: 2. Critical Dependency Vulnerability in a Pingora Crate

  • Threat: Critical Dependency Vulnerability
  • Description: A critical vulnerability exists in a third-party Rust crate that Pingora directly depends on. An attacker exploits this vulnerability, potentially through crafted inputs or interactions that trigger the vulnerable code path within Pingora.
  • Impact:
    • Critical: Remote Code Execution (RCE) - If the vulnerable dependency allows code execution, an attacker can gain control of the Pingora server.
    • High: Significant Denial of Service (DoS) - The vulnerability causes widespread crashes or instability in Pingora, leading to prolonged service outages.
  • Affected Pingora Component: Dependency Management, any Pingora module or core functionality utilizing the vulnerable crate.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Upstream: Proactive dependency monitoring and rapid updates from Cloudflare are crucial. Utilize dependency scanning tools to identify known vulnerabilities in Pingora's dependencies.
    • Development: Implement Software Composition Analysis (SCA) in the development pipeline to continuously monitor dependencies for vulnerabilities. Pin dependency versions and carefully evaluate security implications before updating dependencies.

Threat: 3. Pingora Misconfiguration - Critical Internal Endpoint Exposure

  • Threat: Pingora Misconfiguration - Critical Internal Endpoint Exposure
  • Description: A severe misconfiguration in Pingora unintentionally exposes a highly sensitive internal service or management endpoint directly to the public internet. An attacker discovers this exposed endpoint through reconnaissance and exploits it.
  • Impact:
    • Critical: Full System Compromise - Attacker gains administrative access to internal systems via the exposed endpoint, leading to complete control over infrastructure and data.
    • Critical: Massive Data Breach - Highly sensitive internal data is directly accessible and compromised through the exposed endpoint.
  • Affected Pingora Component: Configuration Management, Routing, Access Control.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Development & Deployment: Implement infrastructure-as-code and configuration management best practices to ensure consistent and secure configurations. Adopt a principle of least privilege for all configurations. Conduct rigorous security reviews of Pingora configurations before deployment and after any changes. Implement strong network segmentation and firewalls to strictly isolate internal services. Regularly audit configurations for potential misconfigurations and unintended exposures.

Threat: 4. Pingora Misconfiguration - Critically Weak TLS Configuration

  • Threat: Pingora Misconfiguration - Critically Weak TLS Configuration
  • Description: Pingora is misconfigured with extremely weak or severely outdated TLS settings, such as using export-grade ciphers or completely disabling essential security features. An attacker actively performs a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to easily break the TLS encryption and intercept all traffic.
  • Impact:
    • Critical: Complete Data Breach - All sensitive data transmitted over TLS is readily intercepted and decrypted by the attacker, leading to a complete compromise of confidential information.
  • Affected Pingora Component: TLS/SSL Configuration, Connection Handling.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Development & Deployment: Enforce the strongest possible TLS configurations. Disable all weak and outdated ciphers and protocols. Mandate the use of modern TLS versions (TLS 1.3 or 1.2 minimum). Utilize automated tools to continuously assess and enforce TLS configuration strength. Regularly update TLS libraries and configurations to address newly discovered vulnerabilities.

Threat: 5. Resource Exhaustion DoS Attack Leading to Service Outage

  • Threat: Resource Exhaustion Denial of Service (DoS) Attack
  • Description: A sophisticated attacker launches a large-scale or highly crafted resource exhaustion DoS attack against Pingora. This attack is designed to overwhelm Pingora's processing capacity, memory, or network bandwidth, pushing it beyond its limits and causing a complete service outage.
  • Impact:
    • High: Prolonged Denial of Service (DoS) - Service becomes completely unavailable to all legitimate users for an extended period, causing significant business disruption and reputational damage.
  • Affected Pingora Component: Request Handling, Connection Management, Resource Management.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Development & Deployment: Implement robust rate limiting and adaptive request throttling mechanisms. Carefully configure resource limits and quotas to prevent exhaustion. Implement aggressive request timeouts and connection limits. Utilize robust load balancing and autoscaling infrastructure to handle traffic surges. Employ dedicated DDoS mitigation services and techniques to detect and block malicious traffic. Implement comprehensive monitoring and alerting for resource utilization to proactively identify and respond to DoS attacks.

Threat: 6. Slowloris/Slow Post DoS Attack Causing Service Unavailability

  • Threat: Slowloris/Slow Post Denial of Service (DoS) Attack
  • Description: A coordinated Slowloris or Slow Post DoS attack is launched against Pingora. Attackers establish a large number of slow connections, sending incomplete requests or data at extremely slow rates. This rapidly exhausts Pingora's connection limits and available resources, preventing legitimate users from connecting and rendering the service unavailable.
  • Impact:
    • High: Denial of Service (DoS) - Service becomes unavailable to legitimate users, impacting business operations and user experience.
  • Affected Pingora Component: Connection Management, Request Handling.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Development & Deployment: Implement aggressive connection timeouts and keep-alive timeouts to quickly close slow or idle connections. Strictly limit the number of concurrent connections allowed from a single IP address. Deploy reverse proxies or load balancers with advanced connection limiting and request filtering capabilities. Implement request body timeouts to prevent slow post attacks. Utilize DDoS mitigation services that specifically address slow connection attacks.

Threat: 7. HTTP Request Smuggling Leading to Backend Compromise

  • Threat: HTTP Request Smuggling
  • Description: A highly skilled attacker identifies and exploits subtle discrepancies in HTTP request parsing between Pingora and backend servers. By crafting carefully manipulated HTTP requests, the attacker "smuggles" malicious requests past Pingora's front-end security checks. These smuggled requests are then misinterpreted and processed by the backend server in an unintended and harmful way.
  • Impact:
    • High: Backend System Compromise - Attackers can bypass Pingora's security controls to directly target and compromise backend systems, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive data or internal functionalities.
    • High: Data Manipulation and Corruption - Smuggled requests can be used to manipulate data on backend systems or corrupt critical application data.
  • Affected Pingora Component: HTTP Parser, Request Routing, Proxying Logic.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Upstream: Rely on Cloudflare's expertise in secure HTTP parsing and prompt patching of Pingora to address any discovered request smuggling vulnerabilities.
    • Development & Deployment: Ensure strict consistency in HTTP parsing behavior between Pingora and all backend servers. Configure both Pingora and backend servers to strictly adhere to HTTP standards, especially regarding Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers. Disable or carefully manage any features that might introduce parsing ambiguities or inconsistencies. Implement rigorous testing and security audits specifically focused on detecting and preventing request smuggling vulnerabilities. Regularly review configurations and update systems to incorporate best practices for request smuggling prevention.