Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
41 lines (34 loc) · 4.65 KB

File metadata and controls

41 lines (34 loc) · 4.65 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for crossbeam-rs/crossbeam

Attack Surface: Race Conditions

  • Description: Race conditions occur when the program's behavior depends on the uncontrolled timing or ordering of events in concurrent threads accessing shared resources.
  • Crossbeam Contribution: Incorrect use of crossbeam's concurrency primitives (channels, queues, atomics) for managing shared state can introduce race conditions.
  • Example: Two threads concurrently increment a shared counter protected by a crossbeam channel used as a mutex. If channel operations are not correctly implemented for exclusive access, both threads might read the counter's value before either increments it, leading to an incorrect final count.
  • Impact: Data corruption, incorrect program behavior, circumvention of access controls, information disclosure, denial of service.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Proper Synchronization: Utilize appropriate crossbeam synchronization primitives (channels, atomics) to protect shared resources and enforce exclusive access when needed.
    • Minimize Shared Mutable State: Reduce shared mutable state between threads, favoring message passing and immutable data structures.
    • Thorough Concurrency Testing: Implement rigorous unit and integration tests specifically targeting concurrent code paths to detect race conditions. Employ thread sanitizers during development.
    • Focused Code Reviews: Conduct code reviews emphasizing concurrency logic to identify potential race conditions.

Attack Surface: Deadlocks

  • Description: Deadlocks occur when two or more threads become blocked indefinitely, each waiting for a resource held by another thread in the cycle.
  • Crossbeam Contribution: Improperly designed concurrent logic using crossbeam's channels or synchronization mechanisms can create circular dependencies in resource acquisition, leading to deadlocks.
  • Example: Thread A waits to receive a message from a channel that Thread B is supposed to send. Simultaneously, Thread B waits to receive a message from a different channel that Thread A is supposed to send. If neither thread sends a message before attempting to receive, both threads will block indefinitely, causing a deadlock.
  • Impact: Denial of service, application freeze, loss of functionality.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Ordering: Establish a clear, consistent order for acquiring resources to prevent circular dependencies.
    • Timeout Mechanisms: Implement timeouts for channel operations or other blocking operations to prevent indefinite waiting in deadlock scenarios.
    • Deadlock Detection Tools: Utilize deadlock detection tools during development and testing to identify potential deadlock situations.
    • Careful Concurrent Design: Design concurrent logic to avoid scenarios where threads need to acquire multiple resources in a way that can lead to cycles.
  • Description: Using unbounded queues or channels can lead to resource exhaustion if an attacker floods the application with messages, consuming excessive memory or CPU resources.
  • Crossbeam Contribution: Crossbeam provides unbounded channels and queues. If used without resource limits or backpressure, they can become a denial-of-service attack vector.
  • Example: An application uses an unbounded crossbeam channel to receive network requests. An attacker floods the application with a massive number of requests, filling the channel's queue. This can lead to excessive memory consumption, potentially crashing the application or causing unresponsiveness due to CPU overload processing the backlog.
  • Impact: Denial of service, memory exhaustion, CPU exhaustion, application crash.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Bounded Queues/Channels: Utilize bounded channels and queues from crossbeam to limit the maximum number of messages buffered.
    • Backpressure Implementation: Implement backpressure mechanisms to signal message producers to slow down when queues approach capacity.
    • Input Validation and Rate Limiting: Validate and sanitize input messages to prevent malicious or excessively large messages from being queued. Implement rate limiting to control incoming message rates.
    • Resource Monitoring: Monitor resource usage (memory, CPU, queue sizes) to detect potential resource exhaustion attacks.