Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (23 loc) · 3.55 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

28 lines (23 loc) · 3.55 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for crossbeam-rs/crossbeam

Attack Surface: Memory Safety Issues due to Unsafe Code

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure unsafe code within the crossbeam library itself, potentially leading to memory corruption.
  • Crossbeam Contribution: Crossbeam relies on unsafe blocks for performance-critical concurrency primitives. Bugs in these blocks directly introduce memory safety vulnerabilities in applications using crossbeam.
  • Example: A bug in crossbeam-epoch's garbage collection logic could lead to a use-after-free if a reclaimed object is accessed after being freed by the epoch system.
  • Impact: Memory corruption, crashes, arbitrary code execution, data leaks.
  • Risk Severity: Critical to High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Updates: Regularly update crossbeam to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes and security patches released by the maintainers.
    • Code Audits: If feasible and resources allow, conduct audits of crossbeam's unsafe code sections to identify potential memory safety issues.
    • Fuzzing and Testing: Utilize fuzzing techniques and extensive testing of applications using crossbeam to indirectly uncover potential memory safety bugs within crossbeam through observed application behavior.
    • Static Analysis: Employ static analysis tools on both application code and, if possible, crossbeam's source code to detect potential memory safety issues.

Attack Surface: Concurrency Logic Flaws within Crossbeam Primitives

  • Description: Race conditions, deadlocks, livelocks, or other concurrency errors stemming from flaws in the design or implementation of crossbeam's core concurrency primitives (channels, queues, deques, etc.).
  • Crossbeam Contribution: Crossbeam provides the fundamental building blocks for concurrent programming. Bugs in these core primitives directly impact the reliability and security of concurrent applications built with crossbeam.
  • Example: A race condition in crossbeam-channel's channel implementation could lead to messages being dropped or delivered out of order, causing unexpected application behavior or data corruption. A deadlock in a lock-free queue implementation within crossbeam could halt application progress.
  • Impact: Data corruption, denial of service (application hangs or becomes unresponsive), logical errors in application behavior.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rigorous Testing: Implement comprehensive unit and integration tests for concurrent application logic that utilizes crossbeam primitives, specifically targeting the detection of race conditions and deadlocks.
    • Concurrency Testing Tools: Utilize specialized concurrency testing tools like thread sanitizers and model checkers to aid in identifying concurrency bugs in application code and potentially within crossbeam itself if testing its primitives directly.
    • Careful API Usage & Understanding: Thoroughly understand the documented behavior and guarantees of each crossbeam primitive to ensure correct application logic and avoid unintended concurrency issues.
    • Community Monitoring: Stay informed about reported issues, bug fixes, and security advisories related to crossbeam through official channels, community forums, and issue trackers to be aware of potential problems and updates.