Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
50 lines (43 loc) · 5.66 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

50 lines (43 loc) · 5.66 KB

Threat Model Analysis for dalance/procs

Threat: procs Library Vulnerability (Privilege Escalation)

  • Description: A vulnerability exists within the procs library itself (e.g., a buffer overflow, format string vulnerability, integer overflow, or other code execution vulnerability) or one of its direct dependencies (libraries that procs links against and uses internally). An attacker crafts a malicious input, triggers a race condition, or otherwise exploits the vulnerability to gain arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the application using procs. This is a vulnerability within procs or its low-level dependencies, not a misuse of the library.
    • Impact: Potential for complete system compromise if the application runs with elevated privileges. If the application runs as a regular user, the attacker gains the privileges of that user, which could still be used for further attacks.
    • Affected procs Component: Any part of the procs library or its direct dependencies could be affected, depending on the specific vulnerability. This includes all modules and functions, as a vulnerability could exist in any of them.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Keep procs and all its direct dependencies up-to-date. This is the most crucial mitigation.
        • Regularly review security advisories for procs and its dependencies.
        • Perform static analysis (e.g., using tools like Clippy for Rust) and fuzz testing on procs itself to identify potential vulnerabilities.
        • Contribute to the security of procs by reporting any discovered vulnerabilities responsibly to the maintainers.
        • Consider using memory-safe languages or techniques within procs itself (Rust's ownership system helps, but vulnerabilities are still possible).
      • User/Administrator:
        • Ensure the application and its dependencies (including procs) are regularly updated from trusted sources.
        • Run the application with the least necessary privileges (principle of least privilege). Never run the application as root unless absolutely necessary.
        • Consider using sandboxing or containerization (e.g., Docker, systemd-nspawn) to isolate the application and limit the impact of a potential compromise.

Threat: Integer Overflow in Process ID Handling

  • Description: If procs uses integer types that are too small to represent all possible process IDs on a system, an integer overflow could occur. An attacker might be able to exploit this by crafting a scenario where a very large process ID is encountered, leading to unexpected behavior, potentially including a crash or, in a worst-case scenario, exploitable memory corruption. This is a direct vulnerability within how procs handles PIDs internally.
    • Impact: Denial of service (crash) or potential for code execution (depending on how the overflow is handled).
    • Affected procs Component: Any function that handles process IDs, particularly:
      • procs::Process::new()
      • procs::Process::pid()
      • Internal functions that compare or manipulate PIDs.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Ensure that procs uses integer types that are large enough to represent all possible process IDs on the target platforms (e.g., pid_t, or a 64-bit integer on 64-bit systems).
        • Implement robust checks to prevent integer overflows when handling PIDs. Use saturating or wrapping arithmetic where appropriate, and explicitly handle potential overflow conditions.
        • Perform thorough testing, including edge cases and boundary conditions, to ensure that PID handling is robust.
      • User/Administrator: Keep the system and procs updated.

Threat: Race Condition in Process Information Retrieval

  • Description: A race condition could exist within procs if it accesses process information (e.g., from /proc on Linux) without proper synchronization. If a process's state changes (e.g., its command line is modified, or it terminates) during the information retrieval, procs might return inconsistent or incorrect data. An attacker might be able to exploit this by timing their actions to coincide with procs's information retrieval, potentially leading to a denial of service or, in a less likely but more severe scenario, a use-after-free vulnerability or other memory corruption. This is a direct vulnerability within procs's internal logic.
    • Impact: Denial of service (incorrect data or crash), or potentially exploitable memory corruption (less likely, but higher impact).
    • Affected procs Component: Any function that retrieves process information, particularly those that access multiple pieces of information about a process (e.g., cmdline, environ, stat, status).
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developer:
        • Use appropriate synchronization mechanisms (e.g., mutexes, read-write locks) to protect access to shared process information.
        • Minimize the time window during which process information is accessed.
        • If possible, use atomic operations to read process information.
        • Thoroughly test procs under concurrent conditions to identify and fix race conditions.
      • User/Administrator: Keep the system and procs updated.