Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
280 lines (210 loc) · 25.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

280 lines (210 loc) · 25.7 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Vaultwarden

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to provide a thorough evaluation of the Vaultwarden project's security posture based on the provided security design review. The primary objective is to identify potential security vulnerabilities and weaknesses within the Vaultwarden architecture, components, and development lifecycle. This analysis will focus on understanding the security implications of each key component, data flow, and deployment model, ultimately leading to actionable and tailored mitigation strategies to enhance the overall security of Vaultwarden.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis is limited to the information provided in the security design review document, including the business and security posture, C4 diagrams (Context, Container, Deployment), build process description, risk assessment, questions, and assumptions. The analysis will focus on the following key areas:

  • Architecture and Components: Analyzing the security implications of each component within the Vaultwarden system, including the web server, Rocket application, database, and external dependencies like email and database servers.
  • Data Flow and Data Sensitivity: Examining the flow of sensitive data within the system and identifying potential points of exposure.
  • Security Controls: Evaluating the effectiveness of existing and recommended security controls in mitigating identified risks.
  • Deployment Model: Considering the security challenges and implications of the self-hosting deployment model.
  • Build and Release Process: Assessing the security of the build pipeline and software delivery process.

This analysis will not include a live penetration test or source code audit. It is based solely on the provided documentation and aims to provide a structured and insightful security perspective.

Methodology:

The methodology for this deep analysis will involve the following steps:

  1. Decomposition and Understanding: Thoroughly review and understand the provided security design review document, including the C4 diagrams, descriptions, and security controls.
  2. Threat Modeling: Based on the architecture and component analysis, identify potential threats and vulnerabilities relevant to each component and data flow. This will involve considering common web application vulnerabilities, container security risks, and database security concerns.
  3. Security Implication Analysis: For each identified component and threat, analyze the potential security implications, considering confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
  4. Mitigation Strategy Development: Develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies for each identified threat and vulnerability. These strategies will be directly applicable to the Vaultwarden project and its self-hosting nature.
  5. Recommendation Prioritization: Prioritize the mitigation strategies based on their potential impact and feasibility of implementation.
  6. Documentation and Reporting: Document the entire analysis process, including identified threats, security implications, and recommended mitigation strategies in a clear and structured manner.

2. Security Implications of Key Components and Mitigation Strategies

2.1. C4 Context Diagram Components

2.1.1. Users:

  • Security Implications:

    • Weak Master Passwords: Users choosing weak master passwords are a significant vulnerability. If a master password is compromised, the entire vault is at risk.
    • Compromised User Devices: If a user's device is compromised (malware, physical access), the Bitwarden client and potentially the unlocked vault could be exposed.
    • Phishing Attacks: Users could be tricked into entering their master password on a fake Bitwarden login page, leading to credential theft.
    • Lack of 2FA: Users not enabling 2FA are more vulnerable to account takeover if their master password is leaked or cracked.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Password Strength Meter: Implement a strong password strength meter in Bitwarden clients to encourage users to choose strong master passwords.
    • Password Complexity Requirements (Optional Server-Side Setting): Consider adding an optional server-side setting for administrators to enforce password complexity requirements for master passwords.
    • 2FA Enforcement (Optional Server-Side Setting): Provide an option for administrators to enforce 2FA for all users on their Vaultwarden instance.
    • User Education: Provide clear and accessible documentation and in-app guidance on the importance of strong master passwords, 2FA, and device security.
    • Phishing Awareness Training (for organizations): Encourage organizations using Vaultwarden to conduct phishing awareness training for their users.

2.1.2. Vaultwarden Project:

  • Security Implications:

    • Vulnerabilities in Rocket Application: Code vulnerabilities in the Rust backend could lead to various attacks, including authentication bypass, data breaches, and denial of service.
    • API Vulnerabilities: Insecure API endpoints could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to data or functionality.
    • Database Vulnerabilities: SQL injection or other database-related vulnerabilities could compromise the integrity and confidentiality of stored data.
    • Misconfiguration: Incorrect configuration of Vaultwarden or its dependencies (web server, database) by self-hosting users can introduce significant security weaknesses.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in third-party Rust crates or libraries used by the Rocket application could be exploited.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Comprehensive Security Testing: Implement SAST and DAST tools in the CI/CD pipeline as recommended. Conduct regular penetration testing and security audits by external experts.
    • Secure Coding Practices: Enforce secure coding practices throughout the development lifecycle, including input validation, output encoding, and principle of least privilege.
    • Dependency Management and Scanning: Implement dependency scanning tools to identify and address vulnerabilities in third-party crates. Regularly update dependencies.
    • Hardened Deployment Documentation: Provide comprehensive and easy-to-follow documentation on hardened deployment configurations for various environments (Docker, bare metal). Include examples for web server and database configurations.
    • Configuration Validation Tool: Consider developing a configuration validation tool that self-hosting users can use to check their Vaultwarden setup for common security misconfigurations.
    • Rate Limiting and Brute-Force Protection: Implement robust rate limiting and brute-force protection mechanisms for login attempts and other sensitive API endpoints.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP) and Security Headers: Implement and enforce CSP and other security headers (HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) in the web server configuration to mitigate client-side vulnerabilities like XSS.
    • Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Establish a clear and public vulnerability disclosure program to encourage community reporting and facilitate timely patching.

2.1.3. Bitwarden Clients:

  • Security Implications:

    • Client-Side Vulnerabilities: Although Bitwarden clients are considered trusted, vulnerabilities in the clients themselves could potentially be exploited to compromise user data.
    • Outdated Clients: Users using outdated Bitwarden clients might be vulnerable to known security issues that have been patched in newer versions.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Stay Updated with Bitwarden Security Advisories: Monitor Bitwarden's official security advisories and communicate any relevant client-side security concerns to Vaultwarden users.
    • Recommend Latest Client Versions: Encourage Vaultwarden users to always use the latest versions of Bitwarden clients.
    • Client Compatibility Testing: Ensure Vaultwarden remains compatible with the latest secure versions of Bitwarden clients.

2.1.4. Email Server:

  • Security Implications:

    • Email Spoofing/Phishing: If the email server is not properly secured (SPF, DKIM, DMARC misconfiguration), attackers could spoof emails appearing to come from Vaultwarden, potentially leading to phishing attacks.
    • Email Interception: If communication between Vaultwarden and the email server is not encrypted (opportunistic TLS), password reset emails or notification emails could be intercepted in transit.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Secure Email Configuration Documentation: Provide clear documentation for self-hosting users on how to configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records for their domain to prevent email spoofing.
    • Opportunistic TLS for Email Communication: Ensure Vaultwarden attempts to use TLS encryption when communicating with the email server (STARTTLS).
    • Consider Email Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting for password reset emails to mitigate potential abuse.

2.1.5. Database Server:

  • Security Implications:

    • Database Access Control Vulnerabilities: Weak database access controls or misconfigurations could allow unauthorized access to the database, leading to data breaches.
    • Database Injection Vulnerabilities: SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Rocket application could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to or modify database data.
    • Unencrypted Database Backups: If database backups are not encrypted, they could be a target for attackers if they are not stored securely.
    • Database Server Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the database server software itself could be exploited.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Strong Database Access Controls: Document and recommend strong database access control configurations, emphasizing the principle of least privilege.
    • Input Validation and Parameterized Queries: Strictly enforce input validation and use parameterized queries in the Rocket application to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities.
    • Encrypted Database Backups: Recommend and document the importance of encrypting database backups.
    • Database Security Hardening Documentation: Provide documentation on database security hardening best practices for supported database systems (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite).
    • Regular Database Security Updates: Advise users to keep their database servers up-to-date with the latest security patches.

2.2. C4 Container Diagram Components

2.2.1. Web Server (Nginx/Apache):

  • Security Implications:

    • Web Server Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the web server software itself could be exploited.
    • Misconfiguration: Incorrect web server configuration can introduce vulnerabilities (e.g., insecure TLS configuration, exposed administrative interfaces, directory listing).
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Web server could be targeted by DoS attacks, impacting availability.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Web Server Security Hardening: Provide hardened web server configuration examples in documentation, including secure TLS settings (strong ciphers, HSTS), disabling unnecessary modules, and setting appropriate security headers.
    • Regular Web Server Updates: Advise users to keep their web server software up-to-date with security patches.
    • Rate Limiting and DoS Protection: Implement rate limiting at the web server level to mitigate brute-force attacks and basic DoS attempts. Consider using web application firewalls (WAFs) for more advanced DoS protection if needed.
    • Security Headers Configuration: Ensure the web server is configured to send recommended security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.).

2.2.2. Rocket Application (Rust Backend):

  • Security Implications:

    • Application Logic Vulnerabilities: Bugs or flaws in the application logic could lead to security vulnerabilities.
    • Authentication and Authorization Flaws: Weaknesses in authentication or authorization mechanisms could allow unauthorized access.
    • Data Handling Vulnerabilities: Improper handling of sensitive data could lead to data leaks or manipulation.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: As mentioned before, vulnerabilities in Rust crates.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Secure Development Lifecycle: Implement a secure development lifecycle (SDLC) that includes security considerations at every stage.
    • Code Reviews: Conduct thorough code reviews, focusing on security aspects.
    • Automated Security Testing (SAST/DAST): As recommended, integrate SAST and DAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Implement robust input validation and output encoding throughout the application.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege in application design and implementation.
    • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing by external experts.
    • Dependency Scanning and Updates: Maintain up-to-date dependencies and use dependency scanning tools.

2.2.3. Database (MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQLite):

  • Security Implications: (Covered in 2.1.5. Database Server)

2.3. Deployment Diagram Components

2.3.1. Linux Server:

  • Security Implications:

    • Operating System Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the Linux operating system could be exploited to compromise the server and Vaultwarden.
    • Insecure OS Configuration: Misconfigured operating system settings can introduce security weaknesses.
    • Lack of Security Updates: Failure to apply security updates to the OS can leave the server vulnerable.
    • Insufficient Firewall Configuration: Weak or misconfigured firewall rules can allow unauthorized network access.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Operating System Hardening: Provide documentation on OS hardening best practices for Linux servers.
    • Regular OS Security Updates: Emphasize the critical importance of regularly applying security updates to the operating system.
    • Firewall Configuration: Document and recommend strict firewall rules to limit network access to only necessary ports and services.
    • Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS): Recommend considering the use of IDS/IPS for enhanced security monitoring and threat detection.
    • Regular Security Audits of Server Configuration: Encourage users to regularly audit their server configuration for security weaknesses.

2.3.2. Docker Host:

  • Security Implications:

    • Docker Daemon Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the Docker daemon itself could be exploited to compromise the host system or containers.
    • Container Escape: Vulnerabilities in container runtime or application configurations could potentially allow container escape, giving attackers access to the host system.
    • Insecure Docker Configuration: Misconfigured Docker settings can introduce security risks.
    • Privileged Containers: Running containers in privileged mode increases the risk of container escape and host compromise.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Docker Security Hardening: Document and recommend Docker security hardening best practices.
    • Regular Docker Updates: Advise users to keep their Docker installation up-to-date with security patches.
    • Container Image Security Scanning: Implement container image security scanning in the CI/CD pipeline and recommend users to scan their deployed images.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Containers: Run Vaultwarden containers with the least privileges necessary. Avoid running containers in privileged mode.
    • Resource Limits for Containers: Set resource limits for containers to prevent resource exhaustion attacks and improve container isolation.
    • Container Runtime Security: Consider using security-focused container runtimes like containerd or CRI-O.

2.3.3. Vaultwarden Container (Nginx, Rocket App):

  • Security Implications:

    • Vulnerabilities within the Container Image: Vulnerabilities in the base image or software packages included in the container image.
    • Exposed Ports: Unnecessarily exposed ports in the container can increase the attack surface.
    • Insecure Container Configuration: Misconfigured container settings can introduce security risks.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Minimal Base Images: Build container images from minimal and trusted base images to reduce the attack surface.
    • Container Image Security Scanning: Implement automated security scanning of container images in the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Principle of Least Privilege within Container: Run processes within the container with the least privileges necessary.
    • Port Exposure Minimization: Only expose necessary ports from the container.
    • Immutable Container Images: Build immutable container images to ensure consistency and prevent runtime modifications.

2.3.4. Web Server (Nginx) & Rocket App (within Container):

  • Security Implications & Mitigation Strategies: (Covered in 2.2.1. Web Server and 2.2.2. Rocket Application, but within the context of the containerized environment).

2.3.5. Database Server (External or Docker):

  • Security Implications & Mitigation Strategies: (Covered in 2.1.5. Database Server and 2.2.3. Database, considering whether it's external or containerized). If containerized, apply container security best practices as well.

2.4. Build Process Diagram Components

2.4.1. GitHub Repository:

  • Security Implications:

    • Compromised Developer Accounts: If developer accounts are compromised, attackers could potentially inject malicious code into the repository.
    • Branch Protection Bypass: Weak branch protection settings could allow unauthorized code merges.
    • Secret Leaks: Accidental or intentional leakage of secrets (API keys, credentials) in the repository.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Strong Authentication and 2FA for Developers: Enforce strong authentication and 2FA for all developer accounts.
    • Branch Protection Rules: Implement strict branch protection rules to prevent unauthorized code merges and require code reviews.
    • Secret Scanning: Implement automated secret scanning in the CI pipeline to detect and prevent accidental secret leaks.
    • Access Control and Permissions: Enforce strict access control and permissions for the repository, following the principle of least privilege.
    • Audit Logging: Enable audit logging for repository activities to track changes and detect suspicious actions.

2.4.2. GitHub Actions CI:

  • Security Implications:

    • Compromised CI/CD Pipeline: If the CI/CD pipeline is compromised, attackers could inject malicious code into the build process and distribute compromised Docker images.
    • Insecure Workflow Configuration: Insecurely configured CI workflows could introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Secret Management in CI: Improper handling of secrets within CI workflows could lead to secret leaks.
    • Dependency Confusion Attacks: Vulnerability to dependency confusion attacks if not properly managed.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Secure CI/CD Configuration: Follow secure CI/CD configuration best practices.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for CI Jobs: Run CI jobs with the least privileges necessary.
    • Secure Secret Management in CI: Use secure secret management mechanisms provided by GitHub Actions (encrypted secrets). Avoid hardcoding secrets in workflows.
    • Workflow Reviews: Conduct security reviews of CI workflows.
    • Dependency Pinning and Verification: Pin dependencies in build files and verify checksums to mitigate dependency confusion attacks.
    • Code Signing and Image Signing: Implement code signing for releases and Docker image signing to ensure integrity and authenticity.

2.4.3. Docker Registry:

  • Security Implications:

    • Unauthorized Access to Registry: Unauthorized access to the Docker registry could allow attackers to modify or delete Docker images.
    • Compromised Docker Images: Attackers could potentially compromise Docker images in the registry, leading to distribution of malicious software.
    • Registry Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the Docker registry software itself could be exploited.

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Access Control to Docker Registry: Implement strong access control to the Docker registry, limiting access to authorized users and systems.
    • Registry Security Hardening: Harden the Docker registry configuration.
    • Regular Registry Security Updates: Keep the Docker registry software up-to-date with security patches.
    • Image Scanning in Registry: Integrate security scanning of Docker images within the registry.
    • Content Trust/Image Signing: Enforce content trust or image signing to ensure image integrity and authenticity.

3. Specific Recommendations for Vaultwarden

Based on the analysis, here are specific and actionable recommendations for the Vaultwarden project:

  1. Enhance Automated Security Testing:

    • Implement DAST in CI/CD: Integrate Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tools into the CI/CD pipeline to complement SAST and identify runtime vulnerabilities.
    • Regular Dependency Scanning: Implement automated dependency scanning for Rust crates and JavaScript dependencies (if any) in the CI/CD pipeline and establish a process for promptly addressing identified vulnerabilities.
    • Container Image Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate container image security scanning into the CI/CD pipeline to identify vulnerabilities in base images and dependencies within the Docker image.

  2. Strengthen Deployment Security Guidance:

    • Develop Hardened Deployment Guides: Create comprehensive and environment-specific (Docker, bare metal, common cloud providers) hardened deployment guides for self-hosting users. These guides should cover web server, database, OS, and Docker security configurations.
    • Configuration Validation Tool: Develop a command-line tool or script that users can run to validate their Vaultwarden configuration against security best practices and identify potential misconfigurations.
    • Security Checklist for Self-Hosting: Provide a security checklist for self-hosting users to guide them through essential security configuration steps.

  3. Improve Brute-Force and Rate Limiting:

    • Implement Robust Rate Limiting: Enhance rate limiting mechanisms for login attempts, password reset requests, and other sensitive API endpoints at both the web server and application levels.
    • Account Lockout Policy: Implement an account lockout policy after a certain number of failed login attempts to further mitigate brute-force attacks.
    • Consider CAPTCHA: For high-risk scenarios or after multiple failed login attempts, consider implementing CAPTCHA to prevent automated brute-force attacks.

  4. Enhance Security Headers and CSP:

    • Strict CSP Implementation: Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS vulnerabilities. Carefully define allowed sources and directives.
    • Security Headers Best Practices: Ensure all recommended security headers (HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) are correctly configured in the web server and documented for user deployments.

  5. Formalize Vulnerability Management and Incident Response:

    • Public Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Establish a clear and public vulnerability disclosure program with guidelines for reporting security vulnerabilities and expected response times.
    • Security Incident Response Plan: Develop a formal security incident response plan to outline procedures for handling security incidents, data breaches, and vulnerability disclosures.
    • Dedicated Security Contact/Team: Consider designating a dedicated security contact or team to manage security-related inquiries, vulnerability reports, and incident response.

  6. Promote User Security Awareness:

    • In-App Security Tips: Integrate security tips and best practices directly into the Vaultwarden web interface and documentation to educate users on secure password management and self-hosting practices.
    • Security Blog/Announcements: Regularly publish security-related blog posts or announcements to keep users informed about security updates, best practices, and potential threats.

  7. Consider Optional Security Features:

    • Web Application Firewall (WAF) Recommendations: Provide recommendations and guidance on integrating Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) for users who require enhanced protection against web attacks.
    • Intrusion Detection/Prevention System (IDS/IPS) Recommendations: Suggest the use of IDS/IPS for users seeking advanced security monitoring and threat detection for their Vaultwarden deployments.

By implementing these tailored mitigation strategies, the Vaultwarden project can significantly enhance its security posture, reduce the risk of vulnerabilities, and provide a more secure password management solution for its users. Continuous security monitoring, testing, and improvement are crucial for maintaining a strong security posture in the long term.