Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
233 lines (193 loc) · 21.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

233 lines (193 loc) · 21.7 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Vaultwarden

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of Vaultwarden, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and deployment model. The analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess existing security controls, and provide actionable mitigation strategies to enhance the overall security posture of a Vaultwarden deployment. The primary focus is on preventing data breaches, ensuring data integrity, and maintaining service availability.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following aspects of Vaultwarden:

  • Source Code (Rust): Analysis of the Rust codebase for secure coding practices, vulnerability patterns, and proper implementation of security controls. This includes, but is not limited to, areas related to authentication, authorization, input validation, cryptography, and data handling.
  • Dependencies: Assessment of the security posture of third-party Rust crates and other dependencies used by Vaultwarden.
  • Architecture and Data Flow: Understanding the interaction between different components (web server, API application, database, etc.) and the flow of sensitive data.
  • Deployment Model (Docker Compose): Evaluation of the security implications of the chosen deployment model, including containerization, networking, and reverse proxy configuration.
  • Configuration Options: Analysis of available configuration options and their impact on security.
  • Integration with External Services: Assessment of the security of integrations with optional external services (e.g., 2FA providers, email servers).

Methodology:

The analysis will employ the following methodologies:

  1. Security Design Review Analysis: Thorough review of the provided security design review document, including business posture, security posture, design diagrams (C4 context and container), deployment model, build process, and risk assessment.
  2. Code Review (Inferred): Based on the security design review and publicly available information about Vaultwarden's codebase (Rust), we will infer potential security-relevant code patterns and areas of concern. This is not a full line-by-line code review, but rather a targeted analysis based on common security best practices and known vulnerabilities in similar applications.
  3. Dependency Analysis (Inferred): Based on the known use of Rust and common libraries for web applications and database interaction, we will infer likely dependencies and assess their potential security implications.
  4. Threat Modeling: Identification of potential threats and attack vectors based on the architecture, data flow, and deployment model.
  5. Best Practices Review: Comparison of Vaultwarden's design and implementation against industry-standard security best practices.
  6. Documentation Review: Analysis of available Vaultwarden documentation to identify security-related guidance and recommendations.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the security design review and inferred architecture, here's a breakdown of the security implications of key components:

  • Web Server (e.g., Rocket, Actix Web):

    • Implications: This is the entry point for all external requests. It's responsible for handling HTTPS, routing requests, and serving static content (Web Vault). Vulnerabilities here could lead to denial-of-service, information disclosure, or potentially remote code execution.
    • Specific Concerns: Proper handling of HTTP headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), secure cookie management, protection against common web attacks (XSS, CSRF, clickjacking), and secure configuration of the web server itself. Rate limiting is crucial here.
    • Rust-Specific: While Rust frameworks are generally memory-safe, improper use of unsafe blocks or vulnerabilities in underlying libraries could still exist.

  • API Application (Rust):

    • Implications: This is the core logic of Vaultwarden. It handles authentication, authorization, data processing, and interaction with the database. Vulnerabilities here could lead to data breaches, privilege escalation, or denial-of-service.
    • Specific Concerns: Secure implementation of authentication and authorization mechanisms, robust input validation (to prevent SQL injection, XSS, and other injection attacks), secure handling of secrets and cryptographic keys, proper error handling, and adherence to secure coding practices.
    • Rust-Specific: Memory safety is a key benefit of Rust, but careful attention must be paid to the use of unsafe blocks, error handling (avoiding panics that could leak information), and the security of external crates. Proper use of Rust's type system and ownership model is crucial for preventing vulnerabilities.

  • Database (SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL):

    • Implications: This stores all user data, including encrypted password vaults. Compromise of the database would lead to a complete data breach.
    • Specific Concerns: Secure configuration of the database server (strong passwords, access control, network restrictions), encryption at rest (using appropriate database features or external tools), protection against SQL injection, regular backups, and secure handling of database credentials. The choice of database (SQLite vs. PostgreSQL/MySQL) has significant security implications. SQLite is simpler but may be less robust for high-concurrency scenarios and lacks built-in user management.
    • Rust-Specific: Safe interaction with the database through a well-vetted ORM or database driver is crucial. Parameterized queries are essential to prevent SQL injection.

  • Web Vault (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):

    • Implications: This is the user interface for the web application. Vulnerabilities here could lead to XSS, CSRF, or other client-side attacks.
    • Specific Concerns: Strict adherence to secure coding practices for web applications, including proper output encoding, input validation, and use of security-focused HTTP headers (CSP, HSTS). Minimizing the use of JavaScript and avoiding vulnerable libraries is important.
    • Rust-Specific: While the Web Vault is primarily static content, any server-side rendering or dynamic content generation should be carefully reviewed for potential vulnerabilities.

  • Email Server (Optional):

    • Implications: Used for password resets and other notifications. Compromise could lead to phishing attacks or account takeover.
    • Specific Concerns: Secure configuration of the SMTP connection (TLS), proper authentication, and protection against spam and phishing attacks. Vaultwarden should not store email server credentials in plain text.
    • Rust-Specific: Secure handling of email server credentials within the Rust application.

  • External Services (Optional, e.g., YubiKey, Duo):

    • Implications: Used for 2FA. Vulnerabilities here could bypass 2FA protection.
    • Specific Concerns: Secure communication with external services (HTTPS), proper validation of responses, and secure handling of API keys and secrets.
    • Rust-Specific: Secure handling of API keys and secrets within the Rust application.

  • Reverse Proxy (e.g., Nginx, Caddy):

    • Implications: Handles TLS termination, load balancing, and potentially acts as a WAF. Crucial for external-facing security.
    • Specific Concerns: Correct TLS configuration (strong ciphers, proper certificate management), request filtering, rate limiting, and potentially WAF rules to block common attacks.
    • Rust-Specific: Not directly related to Rust, but the reverse proxy's configuration is critical for protecting the Rust-based application.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the C4 diagrams and common patterns for web applications, we can infer the following:

Architecture:

Vaultwarden follows a typical three-tier architecture:

  1. Presentation Tier: Web Server (Rocket/Actix Web) + Web Vault (HTML/CSS/JavaScript)
  2. Application Tier: API Application (Rust)
  3. Data Tier: Database (SQLite/PostgreSQL/MySQL)

Components:

  • User: Interacts with the application through a web browser or Bitwarden client.
  • Web Server: Receives requests, serves static content, and forwards API requests.
  • API Application: Handles business logic, authentication, authorization, and data access.
  • Database: Stores user data.
  • Reverse Proxy: Handles TLS termination and request routing.
  • Email Server (Optional): Sends emails for password resets, etc.
  • External Services (Optional): Provides 2FA or other integrations.

Data Flow:

  1. User Authentication:
    • User enters credentials in the Bitwarden client or Web Vault.
    • The request is sent over HTTPS to the Web Server.
    • The Web Server forwards the request to the API Application.
    • The API Application validates the credentials against the Database.
    • If successful, an authentication token is generated and returned to the client.
  2. Password Vault Access:
    • The client sends a request with the authentication token to the Web Server.
    • The Web Server forwards the request to the API Application.
    • The API Application verifies the token and retrieves the encrypted password vault from the Database.
    • The encrypted vault is returned to the client (decryption happens client-side).
  3. Password Reset:
    • User requests a password reset.
    • The API Application generates a reset token and sends an email (via the Email Server) to the user.
    • The user clicks the link in the email, which contains the reset token.
    • The API Application validates the token and allows the user to set a new password.
  4. 2FA (Optional):
    • After successful password authentication, the API Application interacts with the External Service (e.g., YubiKey, Duo) to perform 2FA.
    • The user completes the 2FA challenge.
    • The External Service verifies the challenge and notifies the API Application.

4. Specific Security Considerations and Recommendations

Based on the analysis, here are specific security considerations and recommendations tailored to Vaultwarden:

Critical Areas:

  • Authentication and Authorization: This is the most critical area. Any vulnerability here could lead to unauthorized access to user data.
    • Recommendation: Ensure robust implementation of password hashing (Argon2id with appropriate parameters), secure token generation and management, and strict enforcement of 2FA when enabled. Regularly review and test the authentication and authorization flow. Consider using a well-vetted authentication library. Implement account lockout policies to mitigate brute-force attacks. Specifically, audit the code that handles token creation, validation, and storage.
  • Input Validation: Preventing injection attacks (SQL injection, XSS) is crucial.
    • Recommendation: Validate all user inputs on the server-side, using a whitelist approach whenever possible. Sanitize data before displaying it in the Web Vault. Use parameterized queries for all database interactions. Specifically, audit all API endpoints and database queries for potential injection vulnerabilities.
  • Cryptography: Proper use of cryptography is essential for protecting sensitive data.
    • Recommendation: Use strong, industry-standard cryptographic algorithms and libraries. Securely manage cryptographic keys (avoid storing them in the codebase). Protect against known cryptographic attacks (e.g., timing attacks). Specifically, audit the code that handles encryption, decryption, and key derivation.
  • Database Security: Protecting the database is paramount.
    • Recommendation: Use a robust database server like PostgreSQL with encryption at rest enabled. Configure the database with strong passwords and access control. Regularly back up the database. Specifically, ensure that database credentials are not stored in the codebase or configuration files in plain text. Use environment variables or a secrets management solution.
  • Web Vault Security: Preventing client-side attacks is important.
    • Recommendation: Implement a strong Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS attacks. Use HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS connections. Set secure cookie attributes (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite). Specifically, review the Web Vault code for any potential XSS vulnerabilities.
  • Dependency Management: Vulnerabilities in third-party crates can introduce risks.
    • Recommendation: Regularly update dependencies to the latest versions. Use cargo audit or a similar tool to scan for known vulnerabilities in dependencies. Carefully vet any new dependencies before adding them to the project. Specifically, create a process for regularly reviewing and updating dependencies.
  • Unsafe Rust: Minimize and carefully audit unsafe blocks.
    • Recommendation: unsafe blocks bypass Rust's safety guarantees and should be used sparingly and with extreme caution. Each unsafe block should be thoroughly documented and justified. Specifically, audit all unsafe blocks for potential memory safety issues.
  • Error Handling: Avoid leaking sensitive information through error messages.
    • Recommendation: Implement proper error handling that does not expose internal details or sensitive data to the user. Log errors securely for debugging purposes. Specifically, review error handling code to ensure that it does not leak sensitive information.
  • Rate Limiting: Protect against brute-force and denial-of-service attacks.
    • Recommendation: Implement robust rate limiting on all API endpoints, especially authentication endpoints. Configure rate limiting appropriately for different types of requests. Specifically, review and test the rate limiting configuration.
  • Admin Interface: The admin interface must be strongly protected.
    • Recommendation: Require a strong, unique password for the admin interface. Consider restricting access to the admin interface to specific IP addresses or using a VPN. Implement 2FA for the admin interface. Specifically, audit the code that handles admin authentication and authorization.
  • Docker Security: Follow best practices for container security.
    • Recommendation: Run the Vaultwarden container as a non-root user. Use a minimal base image. Regularly update the base image and Vaultwarden itself. Use a secure container registry. Specifically, review the Dockerfile and Docker Compose configuration for security best practices.
  • Reverse Proxy Configuration: The reverse proxy is a critical security component.
    • Recommendation: Configure the reverse proxy with strong TLS settings (modern ciphers, HSTS, OCSP stapling). Implement rate limiting and request filtering. Consider using a WAF. Specifically, review the reverse proxy configuration for security best practices.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are actionable mitigation strategies, categorized by area:

Code-Level Mitigations (Rust):

  1. Authentication/Authorization:
    • Use a well-vetted authentication library (e.g., actix-identity, rocket-auth) if possible, rather than implementing custom authentication logic.
    • Ensure proper validation of JWTs or other session tokens, including signature verification and expiration checks.
    • Implement robust account lockout policies to prevent brute-force attacks.
    • Store password hashes using Argon2id with parameters tuned for appropriate computational cost (memory, time, parallelism). Use a cryptographically secure random number generator for salts.
  2. Input Validation:
    • Use a strict whitelist approach for validating user inputs whenever possible.
    • Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions to prevent SQL injection. Avoid dynamic SQL generation.
    • Use a templating engine (e.g., Tera, Handlebars) that automatically escapes output to prevent XSS in the Web Vault.
    • Sanitize any user-supplied data before displaying it in the Web Vault, even if it comes from the database.
  3. Cryptography:
    • Use a well-vetted cryptography library (e.g., ring, rustls, sodiumoxide).
    • Avoid implementing custom cryptographic algorithms.
    • Store cryptographic keys securely, outside of the codebase (e.g., using environment variables, a secrets management solution, or a dedicated key management service).
    • Use appropriate key derivation functions (KDFs) to derive keys from passwords or other secrets.
  4. unsafe Code:
    • Minimize the use of unsafe blocks.
    • Thoroughly document and justify each unsafe block.
    • Use static analysis tools (e.g., clippy, miri) to identify potential memory safety issues in unsafe code.
  5. Error Handling:
    • Avoid panicking in production code. Use Result and Option types to handle errors gracefully.
    • Log errors securely, without exposing sensitive information.
    • Return generic error messages to the user, rather than revealing internal details.
  6. Dependency Management:
    • Regularly run cargo update to update dependencies.
    • Use cargo audit to identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies.
    • Pin dependencies to specific versions to avoid unexpected breaking changes.
    • Consider using a dependency vulnerability scanner as part of the CI/CD pipeline.

Deployment-Level Mitigations (Docker Compose):

  1. Reverse Proxy:
    • Use a well-configured reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Caddy) to handle TLS termination and request routing.
    • Configure strong TLS settings (modern ciphers, HSTS, OCSP stapling).
    • Implement rate limiting and request filtering at the reverse proxy level.
    • Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to protect against common web attacks.
  2. Vaultwarden Container:
    • Run the Vaultwarden container as a non-root user.
    • Use a minimal base image (e.g., alpine) to reduce the attack surface.
    • Regularly update the base image and Vaultwarden itself.
    • Use a secure container registry (e.g., Docker Hub with signed images, a private registry).
    • Limit container resources (CPU, memory) to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
    • Use Docker's built-in networking features to isolate the Vaultwarden container from other containers and the host network.
  3. Database Container:
    • Use a dedicated database container (e.g., PostgreSQL) rather than relying on SQLite for production deployments.
    • Configure the database with strong passwords and access control.
    • Enable encryption at rest for the database.
    • Regularly back up the database.
    • Use a separate network for communication between the Vaultwarden container and the database container.
  4. Secrets Management:
    • Do not store secrets (database credentials, API keys, etc.) in the Dockerfile or Docker Compose file.
    • Use environment variables or a secrets management solution (e.g., Docker Secrets, HashiCorp Vault) to inject secrets into the containers at runtime.

Operational Mitigations:

  1. Monitoring and Logging:
    • Implement a robust logging and monitoring system to detect and respond to suspicious activity.
    • Monitor server logs, application logs, and database logs.
    • Use a centralized logging solution (e.g., ELK stack, Graylog) to aggregate and analyze logs.
    • Set up alerts for critical events (e.g., failed login attempts, database errors, high CPU usage).
  2. Security Audits and Penetration Testing:
    • Regularly conduct security audits and penetration testing to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.
    • Use both automated and manual testing techniques.
    • Engage external security experts to perform independent assessments.
  3. Vulnerability Disclosure Program:
    • Implement a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
    • Provide a clear and easy way for security researchers to report vulnerabilities.
    • Respond promptly and professionally to vulnerability reports.
  4. Security Training:
    • Provide security training to developers and system administrators.
    • Cover topics such as secure coding practices, vulnerability management, and incident response.
  5. Incident Response Plan:
    • Develop and maintain an incident response plan to handle security incidents effectively.
    • Define roles and responsibilities for incident response.
    • Establish procedures for containing, eradicating, and recovering from security incidents.
    • Regularly test the incident response plan.
  6. Backups and Disaster Recovery:
    • Implement regular backups of the database and other critical data.
    • Test the backup and restore process regularly.
    • Have a disaster recovery plan in place to ensure business continuity in the event of a major outage.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Vaultwarden. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the development team and users can significantly enhance the security posture of their Vaultwarden deployments and protect sensitive user data. The most important takeaway is to prioritize secure coding practices, robust input validation, strong authentication and authorization, and secure configuration of the deployment environment. Regular security audits and penetration testing are essential for identifying and addressing any remaining vulnerabilities.