Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
63 lines (54 loc) · 9.72 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

63 lines (54 loc) · 9.72 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dioxuslabs/dioxus

Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization and Output Encoding within Dioxus Components

  • Description:
    1. Identify Dioxus Component Input Points: Pinpoint the exact locations within your Dioxus components where user-provided data is incorporated into the rendered output. This includes data from props, state, or global context that originates from user input.
    2. Utilize Rust Sanitization Libraries in Dioxus: Integrate a Rust HTML sanitization library (like ammonia or html5ever) directly within your Dioxus components.
    3. Sanitize Before Dioxus Rendering: Apply the sanitization function to user input before it's used within the rsx! macro or any manual DOM manipulation within your Dioxus component's render function. This ensures that only safe HTML is passed to Dioxus's virtual DOM.
    4. Context-Aware Encoding in rsx! Macro: Leverage Dioxus's rsx! macro features to ensure context-aware output encoding. While rsx! provides some default encoding, explicitly handle attribute encoding and other context-specific encoding needs when embedding user data.
    5. Avoid Unsafe Dioxus APIs: Refrain from using any Dioxus APIs (if they exist) that bypass its built-in safety mechanisms and allow direct, unsanitized HTML injection. If absolutely necessary, use with extreme caution and after rigorous sanitization.
    6. Test Dioxus Component Sanitization: Specifically test the sanitization within your Dioxus components by rendering components with various inputs, including known XSS payloads, to verify effective blocking of malicious code within the Dioxus rendering context.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - High Severity
  • Impact: Significantly reduces XSS risk by ensuring user input is sanitized within the Dioxus component rendering pipeline, preventing malicious scripts from being rendered into the DOM by Dioxus.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, basic HTML entity encoding is used in the display_comment function within CommentList component for comment text, demonstrating awareness within Dioxus components.
  • Missing Implementation: More robust sanitization using a dedicated library needs to be consistently applied across all Dioxus components handling user input. Context-aware encoding within rsx! needs more explicit attention and testing.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure State Management Practices within Dioxus

  • Description:
    1. Minimize Sensitive Data in Dioxus State: Design your Dioxus application architecture to minimize the storage of highly sensitive data directly within Dioxus's reactive state management system.
    2. Encrypt Sensitive Data in Dioxus State (If Necessary): If sensitive data must be held in Dioxus state, implement encryption before storing it in the state. Use Rust/Wasm encryption libraries compatible with Dioxus's environment. Decrypt only when actively used within Dioxus components and for the shortest duration possible.
    3. Control Dioxus State Updates: Ensure that Dioxus state updates are triggered by validated user interactions or server responses processed within your Dioxus component logic. Prevent direct, unvalidated manipulation of Dioxus state from external JavaScript or untrusted sources.
    4. Review Dioxus Component State Logic: Regularly audit the state management logic within your Dioxus components to identify potential vulnerabilities related to unintended state exposure or manipulation through component interactions.
    5. Secure Dioxus State Persistence (If Used): If you are using any Dioxus-compatible state persistence mechanisms (if available or custom implemented), ensure these mechanisms are secure, especially when handling sensitive data. Consider encryption for persisted Dioxus state.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Exposure - Medium Severity (if sensitive data is stored in Dioxus state)
    • State Manipulation - Medium Severity (leading to unexpected Dioxus application behavior)
  • Impact: Partially reduces data exposure and state manipulation risks by limiting sensitive data in Dioxus state and securing state update flows within the Dioxus application structure.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially. Sensitive user tokens are not directly in Dioxus state, relying on secure HTTP headers after login, showing consideration for state management in Dioxus context.
  • Missing Implementation: Client-side encryption for sensitive data in Dioxus state is not implemented. More rigorous review of state update logic across all Dioxus components is needed. Secure state persistence strategies for Dioxus are not defined.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Wasm and JavaScript Interop in Dioxus Applications

  • Description:
    1. Minimize Dioxus-JS Interop: Reduce the surface area of interaction between your Dioxus/Wasm code and JavaScript. Only expose the minimal necessary functions and data for browser API access or specific functionalities required by Dioxus components.
    2. Validate Inputs at Dioxus-JS Boundary: Implement strict input validation within your Dioxus/Wasm code for all data received from JavaScript. Treat data from JS as untrusted input when it crosses into the Dioxus/Wasm environment.
    3. Sanitize/Encode Outputs for Dioxus-JS Calls: When passing data from Dioxus/Wasm to JavaScript for DOM manipulation or browser API calls, ensure proper encoding or sanitization within your Dioxus code to prevent injection vulnerabilities in the JavaScript context.
    4. Principle of Least Privilege for JS Functions Called by Dioxus: When Dioxus components call JavaScript functions, grant only the minimum necessary permissions and access. Avoid exposing overly powerful JavaScript APIs to your Dioxus/Wasm code if not strictly required by the Dioxus application logic.
    5. Review Dioxus JS Interop Code: Specifically review the JavaScript code that interfaces with your Dioxus application for potential vulnerabilities and security weaknesses in the context of Dioxus component interactions.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Medium Severity (if Dioxus-JS interop is not secure)
    • Code Injection (JS context) - Medium Severity (if Dioxus data passed to JS is not sanitized)
    • Privilege Escalation (if overly powerful JS APIs are exposed to Dioxus) - Low to Medium Severity
  • Impact: Partially reduces vulnerabilities from Dioxus-JS interaction by minimizing the interface, validating inputs within Dioxus, and applying least privilege principles to JS API access from Dioxus.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic input validation is performed on data received from JS for certain browser API calls initiated by Dioxus components (e.g., geolocation).
  • Missing Implementation: More comprehensive input validation and output encoding at the Dioxus-JS boundary are needed, specifically within the Dioxus codebase. A formal review of the Dioxus JS interop interface and exposed functions is missing. Principle of least privilege for JS API access from Dioxus needs stricter enforcement.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Event Handling within Dioxus Components

  • Description:
    1. Sanitize Input in Dioxus Event Handlers: Within your Dioxus component's event handlers (e.g., onclick, oninput, onsubmit within rsx!), sanitize and validate any user input received from events before processing it or updating the Dioxus component's state.
    2. Validate User Input in Dioxus Event Handlers: Implement validation logic within Dioxus event handlers to ensure user input conforms to expected formats and constraints. Reject invalid input and provide feedback within the Dioxus component's UI.
    3. Rate Limiting for Sensitive Dioxus Event-Triggered Operations: For sensitive operations triggered by user events within Dioxus components (e.g., form submissions, authentication actions), consider implementing rate limiting. This might be done at the Dioxus component level (client-side, with limitations) or ideally delegated to server-side validation after Dioxus component interaction.
    4. Avoid Unnecessary Dioxus Event Listeners: Only attach event listeners within Dioxus components to elements that genuinely require them. Excessive event listeners in Dioxus components can increase the attack surface and potentially impact performance within the Dioxus application.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - Medium Severity (if input in Dioxus event handlers is not sanitized)
    • Brute-Force Attacks - Medium Severity (if rate limiting is not implemented for sensitive Dioxus operations)
    • Denial of Service (DoS) - Low to Medium Severity (if excessive event handling in Dioxus allows resource exhaustion)
  • Impact: Partially reduces event handling related vulnerabilities by sanitizing input, validating data, and considering rate limiting for sensitive operations triggered by Dioxus components.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic input validation is present in some Dioxus form handlers, but consistent sanitization within Dioxus event handlers is lacking.
  • Missing Implementation: Systematic input sanitization and validation in all relevant Dioxus event handlers is missing. Rate limiting for sensitive operations triggered by Dioxus events is not implemented within Dioxus components or delegated effectively to server-side.