Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
282 lines (272 loc) · 20.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

282 lines (272 loc) · 20.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for fuellabs/fuels-rs

Objective: Compromise application using fuels-rs to gain unauthorized control or cause financial loss.

Attack Tree Visualization

└── OR Compromise Fuels-rs Application [CRITICAL NODE] ├── AND Exploit Fuels-rs Library Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── OR Dependency Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Utilize public vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE) to find and exploit known flaws in fuels-rs dependencies. │ │ ├── Input Validation Issues in Fuels-rs [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Provide malformed inputs to fuels-rs functions that are not properly validated, leading to unexpected behavior or crashes. │ ├── Supply Chain Attack on Fuels-rs [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├── Compromise Fuels-rs Repository [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Gain access to the fuels-rs GitHub repository and inject malicious code. │ │ ├── Compromise Fuels-rs Release Pipeline [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Intercept or manipulate the release process of fuels-rs to distribute a compromised version. │ │ ├── Compromise crates.io (Dependency Registry) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Compromise crates.io infrastructure to inject malicious code into the fuels-rs crate or its dependencies. ├── AND Exploit Blockchain Interaction Vulnerabilities via Fuels-rs [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── OR Transaction Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Replay Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Capture and replay valid transactions initiated by legitimate users using fuels-rs to duplicate actions (e.g., fund transfers). │ │ ├── Transaction Data Tampering (if application allows) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── If the application allows modification of transaction data before sending via fuels-rs, manipulate data to alter transaction outcome. │ │ ├── Gas Limit/Price Manipulation (if application allows) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── If the application allows control over gas settings via fuels-rs, manipulate gas limits or prices to cause DoS or transaction failures. │ │ ├── Nonce Manipulation (if application allows) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── If the application incorrectly handles nonces via fuels-rs, manipulate nonces to bypass transaction ordering or cause transaction rejection. │ │ ├── Fee Bumping Attacks (if applicable to Fuel network and exposed via fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Exploit fee bumping mechanisms (if exposed by fuels-rs) to prioritize attacker transactions over legitimate ones. │ ├── OR Smart Contract Interaction Vulnerabilities (via Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Function Argument Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Craft malicious function arguments when calling smart contracts via fuels-rs to exploit vulnerabilities in the contract logic (e.g., integer overflows, reentrancy). │ │ ├── Contract State Manipulation (indirectly via function calls) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Utilize vulnerabilities in smart contracts interacted with via fuels-rs to manipulate contract state in an unauthorized manner. │ │ ├── Denial of Service (DoS) via Contract Interaction [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Send transactions via fuels-rs that trigger computationally expensive or resource-intensive operations in smart contracts, leading to DoS. │ │ ├── Reentrancy Attacks (if interacting with vulnerable contracts) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Exploit reentrancy vulnerabilities in smart contracts by crafting malicious calls via fuels-rs. │ │ ├── Front-Running/Back-Running Attacks (if application logic is susceptible) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Monitor pending transactions and use fuels-rs to submit transactions that front-run or back-run legitimate user transactions for profit or manipulation. │ ├── OR Node Communication Vulnerabilities (via Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on Node Connection [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Intercept communication between the application (using fuels-rs) and the Fuel node to eavesdrop on or modify data. │ │ ├── Node Spoofing [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Redirect fuels-rs connection to a malicious node to manipulate data or transactions. │ │ ├── DoS on Node Connection [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Flood the Fuel node with requests via fuels-rs to cause denial of service. ├── AND Exploit Application-Level Vulnerabilities in Fuels-rs Usage [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── OR Insecure Key Management [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├── Storing Private Keys in Plaintext [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Store private keys directly in application code, configuration files, or insecure storage, allowing easy access for attackers. │ │ ├── Key Leakage through Logs/Errors [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Accidentally log or expose private keys in application logs, error messages, or debugging outputs. │ ├── OR Input Validation Issues in Application Logic (using Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Lack of Input Validation for Transaction Parameters [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Fail to validate user inputs that are used to construct transactions via fuels-rs, allowing attackers to inject malicious data. │ │ ├── Improper Handling of User-Provided Contract Addresses/Function Names [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Allow users to specify contract addresses or function names without proper validation, leading to interaction with unintended or malicious contracts/functions. │ │ ├── Insufficient Sanitization of User Inputs in Smart Contract Calls [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Fail to sanitize user inputs before passing them as arguments to smart contract functions via fuels-rs, leading to contract vulnerabilities. │ │ ├── Client-Side Validation Only [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Rely solely on client-side validation for inputs used in fuels-rs operations, which can be easily bypassed by attackers. │ ├── OR Logic Errors in Application Code (using Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Incorrect Transaction Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Flaws in the application's transaction construction logic using fuels-rs leading to unintended consequences (e.g., sending funds to wrong addresses, incorrect amounts). │ │ ├── Error Handling Flaws [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Inadequate error handling in application code using fuels-rs, potentially masking errors or leading to insecure fallback behaviors. │ │ ├── Business Logic Vulnerabilities Exploitable via Fuels-rs [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Flaws in the application's business logic that can be exploited by manipulating blockchain interactions via fuels-rs.

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Fuels-rs Library Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Utilize public vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE) to find and exploit known flaws in fuels-rs dependencies.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: High
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Input Validation Issues in Fuels-rs [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Provide malformed inputs to fuels-rs functions that are not properly validated, leading to unexpected behavior or crashes.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Supply Chain Attack on Fuels-rs [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Compromise Fuels-rs Repository [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • Attack Description: Gain access to the fuels-rs GitHub repository and inject malicious code.
        • Likelihood: Low
        • Impact: Critical
        • Effort: High
        • Skill Level: High
        • Detection Difficulty: High
      • Compromise Fuels-rs Release Pipeline [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • Attack Description: Intercept or manipulate the release process of fuels-rs to distribute a compromised version.
        • Likelihood: Low
        • Impact: Critical
        • Effort: High
        • Skill Level: High
        • Detection Difficulty: High
      • Compromise crates.io (Dependency Registry) [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • Attack Description: Compromise crates.io infrastructure to inject malicious code into the fuels-rs crate or its dependencies.
        • Likelihood: Very Low
        • Impact: Critical
        • Effort: Very High
        • Skill Level: High
        • Detection Difficulty: Extremely High

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Blockchain Interaction Vulnerabilities via Fuels-rs [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Transaction Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Replay Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Capture and replay valid transactions initiated by legitimate users using fuels-rs to duplicate actions (e.g., fund transfers).
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Transaction Data Tampering (if application allows) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: If the application allows modification of transaction data before sending via fuels-rs, manipulate data to alter transaction outcome.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: High
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Gas Limit/Price Manipulation (if application allows) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: If the application allows control over gas settings via fuels-rs, manipulate gas limits or prices to cause DoS or transaction failures.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium
      • Nonce Manipulation (if application allows) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: If the application incorrectly handles nonces via fuels-rs, manipulate nonces to bypass transaction ordering or cause transaction rejection.
        • Likelihood: Low to Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Fee Bumping Attacks (if applicable to Fuel network and exposed via fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Exploit fee bumping mechanisms (if exposed by fuels-rs) to prioritize attacker transactions over legitimate ones.
        • Likelihood: Low to Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Smart Contract Interaction Vulnerabilities (via Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Function Argument Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Craft malicious function arguments when calling smart contracts via fuels-rs to exploit vulnerabilities in the contract logic (e.g., integer overflows, reentrancy).
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: High to Critical
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium to High
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Contract State Manipulation (indirectly via function calls) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Utilize vulnerabilities in smart contracts interacted with via fuels-rs to manipulate contract state in an unauthorized manner.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: High to Critical
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium to High
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Denial of Service (DoS) via Contract Interaction [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Send transactions via fuels-rs that trigger computationally expensive or resource-intensive operations in smart contracts, leading to DoS.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Reentrancy Attacks (if interacting with vulnerable contracts) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Exploit reentrancy vulnerabilities in smart contracts by crafting malicious calls via fuels-rs.
        • Likelihood: Low to Medium
        • Impact: High to Critical
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium to High
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Front-Running/Back-Running Attacks (if application logic is susceptible) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Monitor pending transactions and use fuels-rs to submit transactions that front-run or back-run legitimate user transactions for profit or manipulation.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High
    • Node Communication Vulnerabilities (via Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks on Node Connection [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Intercept communication between the application (using fuels-rs) and the Fuel node to eavesdrop on or modify data.
        • Likelihood: Low to Medium
        • Impact: Medium to High
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High
      • Node Spoofing [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Redirect fuels-rs connection to a malicious node to manipulate data or transactions.
        • Likelihood: Low to Medium
        • Impact: High
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • DoS on Node Connection [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Flood the Fuel node with requests via fuels-rs to cause denial of service.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Application-Level Vulnerabilities in Fuels-rs Usage [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Insecure Key Management [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Storing Private Keys in Plaintext [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • Attack Description: Store private keys directly in application code, configuration files, or insecure storage, allowing easy access for attackers.
        • Likelihood: Medium to High
        • Impact: Critical
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Key Leakage through Logs/Errors [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • Attack Description: Accidentally log or expose private keys in application logs, error messages, or debugging outputs.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Critical
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium
    • Input Validation Issues in Application Logic (using Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Lack of Input Validation for Transaction Parameters [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Fail to validate user inputs that are used to construct transactions via fuels-rs, allowing attackers to inject malicious data.
        • Likelihood: High
        • Impact: Medium to High
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium
      • Improper Handling of User-Provided Contract Addresses/Function Names [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Allow users to specify contract addresses or function names without proper validation, leading to interaction with unintended or malicious contracts/functions.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: High
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Insufficient Sanitization of User Inputs in Smart Contract Calls [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Fail to sanitize user inputs before passing them as arguments to smart contract functions via fuels-rs, leading to contract vulnerabilities.
        • Likelihood: High
        • Impact: High to Critical
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Client-Side Validation Only [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Rely solely on client-side validation for inputs used in fuels-rs operations, which can be easily bypassed by attackers.
        • Likelihood: High
        • Impact: Medium to High
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Low
        • Detection Difficulty: Low
    • Logic Errors in Application Code (using Fuels-rs) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Incorrect Transaction Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Flaws in the application's transaction construction logic using fuels-rs leading to unintended consequences (e.g., sending funds to wrong addresses, incorrect amounts).
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: Medium to High
        • Effort: Medium
        • Skill Level: Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Error Handling Flaws [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Inadequate error handling in application code using fuels-rs, potentially masking errors or leading to insecure fallback behaviors.
        • Likelihood: Medium to High
        • Impact: Medium
        • Effort: Low to Medium
        • Skill Level: Low to Medium
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium
      • Business Logic Vulnerabilities Exploitable via Fuels-rs [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Attack Description: Flaws in the application's business logic that can be exploited by manipulating blockchain interactions via fuels-rs.
        • Likelihood: Medium
        • Impact: High
        • Effort: Medium to High
        • Skill Level: Medium to High
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High