Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
117 lines (93 loc) · 8.54 KB

File metadata and controls

117 lines (93 loc) · 8.54 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for gfx-rs/gfx

Objective: To achieve arbitrary code execution on the target system running the application that uses gfx-rs/gfx, or to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) specifically leveraging vulnerabilities in gfx-rs/gfx. Arbitrary code execution is prioritized.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                     +-------------------------------------------------+
                                     |  Attacker's Goal: Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE) |
                                     |  OR Denial of Service (DoS) via gfx-rs/gfx      |
                                     +-------------------------------------------------+
                                                        |
          +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
          |                                                                                                                |
+-------------------------+                                                                                +-------------------------+
|  1. Exploit gfx-rs/gfx  |                                                                                | 2. Exploit Driver/GPU   |
|     Vulnerabilities     |                                                                                |     Vulnerabilities     |
+-------------------------+                                                                                +-------------------------+
          | [HIGH-RISK]                                                                                                 | [HIGH-RISK]
+---------------------+                                                                                                +---------------------+
| 1.a. Buffer Overflows|                                                                                                | 2.a. Driver Bugs    |
| in Shader Handling  |                                                                                                | (via gfx interface) |
+---------------------+                                                                                                +---------------------+
          |                                                                                                                |
+-------+-------+                                                                                                  +-------+-------+
|1.a.1 |1.a.2 |                                                                                                  |2.a.1 |2.a.2 |
|Mal-  |Craft |                                                                                                  |Known |Zero- |
|formed|Shader|                                                                                                  |Vuln  |Day   |
|Shader|to     |                                                                                                  |[CRITI-|[CRITI-|
|      |Cause |                                                                                                  |CAL]  |CAL]   |
|      |BOF   |                                                                                                  |      |      |
+-------+-------+                                                                                                  +-------+-------+
          |
+---------------------+
| 1.a.3. Integer      |
|        Overflows   |
|        in Size     |
|        Calculations|
+---------------------+
          |
+---------------------+
| 1.a.4. Out-of-      |
|        Bounds      |
|        Writes      |
+---------------------+

This branch represents vulnerabilities within the gfx library itself. The use of Rust significantly reduces the risk of many common vulnerabilities, but unsafe code and interactions with external libraries (like graphics drivers) remain potential attack vectors.

Shaders are complex programs that are often parsed and compiled by gfx. This process can be vulnerable to buffer overflows if not handled carefully.

Description: An attacker provides a specially crafted, syntactically incorrect shader that triggers a buffer overflow when gfx attempts to parse or compile it. This is a classic attack. Likelihood: Medium Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution) Effort: Medium (Requires understanding of shader formats and gfx internals) Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced Detection Difficulty: Medium (Fuzzing and static analysis can help, but subtle bugs might be missed)

Description: The attacker crafts a shader that is syntactically valid but contains logic that, during a later stage of processing (e.g., optimization or execution), causes a buffer overflow. This is more difficult than exploiting a malformed shader. Likelihood: Low to Medium Impact: High (Arbitrary code execution) Effort: High (Requires significant reverse engineering and exploit development) Skill Level: Advanced to Expert Detection Difficulty: Hard (Requires dynamic analysis and potentially manual code review)

Description: If gfx performs calculations to determine buffer sizes related to shaders (or other resources), an integer overflow could lead to allocating a buffer that is too small. Subsequent writes to this undersized buffer would then cause a buffer overflow. Likelihood: Low Impact: High (Arbitrary code execution) Effort: Medium to High Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard

Attack Tree Path: 1.a.4. Out-of-Bounds Writes

Description: Similar to buffer overflows, but specifically focusing on writes that go beyond the allocated memory region, even if not a traditional "overflow" of a contiguous buffer. Likelihood: Low Impact: High (Arbitrary code execution) Effort: Medium to High Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard

This branch represents vulnerabilities in the underlying graphics driver or GPU hardware. gfx acts as an intermediary, and carefully crafted gfx API calls can be used to trigger these vulnerabilities.

Graphics drivers are complex pieces of software and are frequently found to contain vulnerabilities.

Description: An attacker exploits a known vulnerability in the graphics driver. Exploits for these vulnerabilities are often publicly available. Likelihood: Medium (Depends on how quickly users update their drivers) Impact: High (Often allows for arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation) Effort: Low to Medium (Exploits might be publicly available) Skill Level: Intermediate (If using existing exploits) to Advanced (If developing new exploits) Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires monitoring for driver vulnerabilities and potentially intrusion detection systems)

Description: An attacker discovers and exploits a previously unknown (zero-day) vulnerability in the graphics driver. These are rare and highly valuable to attackers. Likelihood: Very Low (Rare and valuable) Impact: Very High (Can bypass all defenses) Effort: Very High (Requires significant expertise and resources) Skill Level: Expert Detection Difficulty: Very Hard (Often requires advanced behavioral analysis or anomaly detection)