Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
91 lines (72 loc) · 8.43 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

91 lines (72 loc) · 8.43 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for gfx-rs/gfx

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Resource Limits and Quotas (gfx-hal Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Identify gfx-hal Resources: List all gfx-hal specific resources: Buffer, Image, ImageView, Sampler, DescriptorSet, DescriptorPool, PipelineLayout, RenderPass, Framebuffer, CommandBuffer, CommandPool, Fence, Semaphore, etc.
    2. Analyze gfx-hal Usage: Determine how your application uses these gfx-hal resources. How many of each are created? What are their sizes (for buffers and images)? How long do they live?
    3. Establish gfx-hal Limits: Set hard limits within your code for the number and size of each gfx-hal resource type. These limits should be enforced before calling gfx-hal functions to create the resources.
    4. gfx-hal Allocation Tracking: Implement a wrapper or manager around gfx-hal's allocation functions (device.create_buffer(...), device.create_image(...), etc.). This wrapper tracks the currently allocated resources and enforces the limits.
    5. Reject gfx-hal Allocations: If a call to a gfx-hal creation function would exceed a limit, the wrapper rejects the allocation and returns an error before calling the underlying gfx-hal function.
    6. gfx-hal Timeouts: When submitting command buffers (queue.submit(...)) or waiting on fences (device.wait_for_fence(...)), use timeouts. If the operation takes longer than the timeout, assume a potential problem (deadlock, resource exhaustion) and take action (log, attempt recovery, terminate). This directly interacts with gfx-hal's synchronization mechanisms.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Resource Exhaustion (Denial of Service): (Severity: High) - Prevents excessive allocation of gfx-hal resources, leading to GPU memory exhaustion.
    • Application Crashes: (Severity: High) - Reduces crashes due to gfx-hal related out-of-memory errors.
    • System Instability: (Severity: High) - Protects the system by limiting the application's gfx-hal resource consumption.

  • Impact:

    • Resource Exhaustion (DoS): Risk significantly reduced. Limits are enforced before gfx-hal allocations.
    • Application Crashes: Risk significantly reduced.
    • System Instability: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Basic limits on gfx-hal Image (texture) sizes in TextureManager.
    • Example: CommandPool size is limited during RenderContext initialization.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: No limits on the number of gfx-hal DescriptorSet or PipelineLayout objects.
    • Example: No timeouts for gfx-hal command buffer submission or fence waiting.
    • Example: No comprehensive wrapper around all gfx-hal allocation functions.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Shader Handling (gfx-hal Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Pre-compile to SPIR-V: Compile shaders offline to SPIR-V. This is a prerequisite, but the gfx-hal interaction is key.
    2. gfx-hal Pipeline Creation: During gfx-hal pipeline creation (device.create_graphics_pipeline(...) or device.create_compute_pipeline(...)), you provide the pre-compiled SPIR-V bytecode. This is the critical gfx-hal interaction point.
    3. Restrict gfx-hal Shader Stages: When creating the pipeline, use only the necessary gfx-hal shader stages (Vertex, Fragment, Compute, etc.). Avoid enabling stages that are not required. This limits the potential attack surface within gfx-hal.
    4. gfx-hal Descriptor Set Layout: Carefully design the gfx-hal descriptor set layouts. Minimize the number of bindings and the types of resources exposed to shaders. Use push constants sparingly. This reduces the potential for shaders to access unauthorized data through gfx-hal.
    5. gfx-hal Specialization Constants: If using specialization constants, validate the values provided to gfx-hal before creating the pipeline. Ensure they do not lead to unsafe shader behavior.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Shader-Based Code Injection: (Severity: High) - The primary mitigation is pre-compilation, but gfx-hal's pipeline creation is where the bytecode is provided.
    • Information Disclosure: (Severity: Medium) - Careful descriptor set layout design limits what data shaders can access through gfx-hal.
    • Denial of Service (via Shaders): (Severity: High) - Limiting shader stages and complexity reduces the potential for DoS.

  • Impact:

    • Shader-Based Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced (primarily by pre-compilation).
    • Information Disclosure: Risk reduced by controlling data exposed through gfx-hal.
    • Denial of Service (via Shaders): Risk reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Shaders are pre-compiled to SPIR-V and loaded during gfx-hal pipeline creation.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: No specific restrictions on gfx-hal shader stages beyond what's functionally required.
    • Example: Descriptor set layouts could be further optimized to minimize exposed resources.
    • Example: No validation of specialization constant values.

Mitigation Strategy: Correct gfx-hal API Usage and Validation

  • Description:

    1. Enable gfx-hal Validation: During development, enable validation layers (Vulkan) or API validation (Metal, DX12) through gfx-hal. This is typically done when creating the gfx-hal instance or adapter. This is a direct gfx-hal configuration.
    2. Handle gfx-hal Result Codes: Every gfx-hal function call returns a result code (typically a Result type in Rust). Check these result codes immediately after each call. Do not ignore errors.
    3. gfx-hal Object Lifetimes: Understand and respect the lifetimes of gfx-hal objects. For example, a CommandBuffer must not outlive the CommandPool it was allocated from. A BufferView must not outlive the Buffer it references. Incorrect lifetime management leads to use-after-free errors, which are directly related to gfx-hal usage.
    4. gfx-hal Synchronization: Use gfx-hal's synchronization primitives (fences, semaphores, barriers) correctly. This is entirely within the realm of gfx-hal. Incorrect synchronization leads to data races and undefined behavior.
    5. gfx-hal Resource State Tracking: Be aware of the state of gfx-hal resources (e.g., image layouts). Use gfx-hal barriers to transition resources to the correct state before using them.
    6. gfx-hal Feature Checks: Before using certain gfx-hal features, check if they are supported by the hardware/driver using adapter.features(). Don't assume that all features are available.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Undefined Behavior: (Severity: High) - Incorrect gfx-hal API usage is a major source of undefined behavior.
    • Application Crashes: (Severity: High) - Many crashes are directly caused by incorrect gfx-hal calls.
    • Data Corruption: (Severity: High) - Incorrect synchronization or resource state management can lead to data corruption.
    • Driver Instability: (Severity: High) - Incorrect gfx-hal usage can trigger driver bugs.

  • Impact:

    • Undefined Behavior: Risk significantly reduced by validation, error handling, and correct API usage.
    • Application Crashes: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Corruption: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Driver Instability: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Validation layers are enabled during debug builds (through gfx-hal configuration).
    • Example: Most gfx-hal result codes are checked.
    • Example: Basic gfx-hal synchronization (fences) is implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: Some gfx-hal result codes might be ignored in less critical code paths.
    • Example: More comprehensive use of gfx-hal barriers for resource state transitions is needed.
    • Example: A systematic review of all gfx-hal object lifetimes is needed.
    • Example: No explicit checks for gfx-hal feature support before using advanced features.