Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
133 lines (116 loc) · 9.02 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

133 lines (116 loc) · 9.02 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for huggingface/candle

Objective: Compromise the Application and/or its Underlying Infrastructure via Candle Vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Candle Vulnerabilities
├───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Exploit Vulnerabilities in Candle Library Code
│   ├───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Memory Safety Issues in Candle (Rust)
│   │   ├───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Trigger Buffer Overflow/Underflow
│   │   ├───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Use-After-Free or Double-Free
│   │   └───[AND] Integer Overflow/Underflow
│   ├───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]** Vulnerabilities in Dependency Crates
├───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Exploit Vulnerabilities in Model Loading/Parsing
│   ├───[AND] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]** Malicious Model File Parsing
├───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Exploit Vulnerabilities in Data Input Handling to Candle
│   ├───[AND] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]** Input Data Injection
├───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Exploit Resource Exhaustion in Candle
│   ├───[AND] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]** Denial of Service via Input Data Volume
└───[OR] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Related to Candle (Less Direct, but Relevant)
    ├───[AND] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]** Compromised Candle Repository/Distribution
    └───[AND] **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** **[CRITICAL NODE]** Compromised Dependencies of Candle

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Candle Library Code

  • 1.1. Critical Node: Trigger Buffer Overflow/Underflow (Memory Safety Issues)

    • Attack Vector:
      • Malicious Model File: Loading a specially crafted model file designed to trigger a buffer overflow during parsing or processing.
      • Crafted Input Data to Inference: Providing input data to the inference engine that causes a buffer overflow during tensor operations or data handling.
    • Attack Type: Buffer Overflow/Underflow
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High (Code execution, system compromise)
    • Effort: Medium to High
    • Skill Level: Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Actionable Insight: Thoroughly fuzz test Candle with various model formats and input data. Use memory safety tools (e.g., AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during development and CI.

  • 1.2. Critical Node: Use-After-Free or Double-Free (Memory Safety Issues)

    • Attack Vector:
      • Complex Model Architectures: Utilizing models with intricate architectures that might expose memory management flaws in Candle.
      • Specific Inference Operations: Triggering specific sequences of inference operations that lead to use-after-free or double-free conditions.
    • Attack Type: Use-After-Free or Double-Free
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium
    • Impact: High (Code execution, system compromise)
    • Effort: Medium to High
    • Skill Level: Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Actionable Insight: Conduct static analysis of Candle code for potential memory management issues. Review and audit unsafe code blocks in Candle.

  • 1.3. Critical Node: Vulnerabilities in Dependency Crates

    • Attack Vector:
      • Any input that triggers dependency code paths: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in crates that Candle depends on. This could be triggered by various inputs depending on the specific dependency and vulnerability.
    • Attack Type: Dependency Vulnerability Exploitation
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High (Depends on the vulnerability, could be code execution, data breaches, DoS)
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium
    • Actionable Insight: Regularly audit and update Candle's dependencies. Use tools to scan for known vulnerabilities in dependencies (e.g., cargo audit). Implement dependency pinning and reproducible builds.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Model Loading/Parsing

  • 2.1. Critical Node: Malicious Model File Parsing
    • Attack Vector:
      • Crafted Model File (e.g., ONNX, safetensors, custom formats): Providing a deliberately malformed or malicious model file to the application for loading and parsing.
    • Attack Type:
      • Buffer Overflow during parsing
      • Path Traversal during file loading (if applicable)
      • Denial of Service via resource exhaustion (e.g., excessively large model, infinite loops in parsing)
    • Likelihood: Medium
    • Impact: High (Buffer Overflow/Path Traversal), Medium (DoS) (Code execution, system access, service disruption)
    • Effort: Medium
    • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (Buffer Overflow), Intermediate (DoS)
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Actionable Insight: Implement robust model file parsing with input validation and size limits. Use secure parsing libraries if available. Fuzz test model parsing logic with malformed and malicious model files.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Data Input Handling to Candle

  • 3.1. Critical Node: Input Data Injection
    • Attack Vector:
      • Maliciously crafted input data to the application: Providing input data that is designed to exploit weaknesses in how the application or Candle handles input.
    • Attack Type:
      • Triggering unexpected behavior in Candle inference
      • Causing crashes or errors in Candle
      • Resource exhaustion in Candle (e.g., very large input)
    • Likelihood: Medium to High
    • Impact: Low to Medium (Crashes/Errors), Medium (Resource Exhaustion), potentially higher if it leads to further exploitation (Service disruption, application instability, resource exhaustion)
    • Effort: Low to Medium
    • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
    • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium
    • Actionable Insight: Implement strict input validation and sanitization before passing data to Candle. Define expected input formats and ranges. Handle errors gracefully from Candle and prevent error details from leaking sensitive information.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Exploit Resource Exhaustion in Candle

  • 4.1. Critical Node: Denial of Service via Input Data Volume
    • Attack Vector:
      • Sending a large volume of inference requests: Flooding the application with a high number of requests to overload the server and/or Candle.
    • Attack Type: Denial of Service
      • Overloading the application server
      • Overloading Candle inference engine
    • Likelihood: High
    • Impact: High (Service disruption, application unavailability)
    • Effort: Low
    • Skill Level: Beginner
    • Detection Difficulty: Low
    • Actionable Insight: Implement rate limiting and request throttling for the application's API endpoints that use Candle. Implement resource quotas for Candle processes.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Related to Candle

  • 5.1. Critical Node: Compromised Candle Repository/Distribution

    • Attack Vector:
      • Attacker compromises the official Candle GitHub repository or distribution channels (crates.io): Gaining unauthorized access to the official Candle project infrastructure.
    • Attack Type: Malicious code injection into Candle library
    • Likelihood: Low
    • Impact: High (Widespread impact, malicious code in many applications using Candle)
    • Effort: High
    • Skill Level: Expert
    • Detection Difficulty: High
    • Actionable Insight: Use official and trusted sources for Candle. Verify checksums and signatures of downloaded Candle crates. Monitor for security advisories related to Candle and its dependencies.

  • 5.2. Critical Node: Compromised Dependencies of Candle

    • Attack Vector:
      • Attacker compromises a dependency crate used by Candle: Injecting malicious code or exploiting vulnerabilities in a crate that Candle relies upon.
    • Attack Type: Vulnerabilities in dependencies are indirectly exploited through Candle.
    • Likelihood: Low to Medium
    • Impact: High (Depends on the compromised dependency and vulnerability, could be code execution, data breaches)
    • Effort: Medium to High
    • Skill Level: Advanced
    • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • Actionable Insight: Regularly audit and update Candle's dependencies. Use dependency scanning tools. Be aware of the supply chain risks associated with open-source libraries.