Mitigation Strategy: Type-Safe Input Handling and Validation (Iced-Specific)
-
Description:
- Iced Widget Events: Utilize Iced's built-in widget events, such as
TextInput::on_input
,Slider::on_change
, and similar events for other input widgets. These events are specific to Iced and are the primary mechanism for reacting to user input. - Message Passing: Within the event handlers (e.g., the closure passed to
on_input
), construct Iced messages that encapsulate the input data. These messages are then passed to theupdate
function. This is the core Iced architecture. update
Function Validation: Perform all type conversion (e.g.,string.parse::<u32>()
) and validation (range checks, length limits, etc.) within theupdate
function after receiving the message. This ensures that the application's state is only updated with valid data.- Custom Widget
update
: If you create custom Iced widgets, implement the validation logic within theupdate
method of your custom widget'sComponent
implementation. This is crucial for maintaining consistency and security. - Iced-Specific Error Display: Use Iced's
Text
widget or other Iced UI elements to display error messages to the user if validation fails. Do not update the application state if validation fails.
- Iced Widget Events: Utilize Iced's built-in widget events, such as
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Logic Errors (Medium Severity): Prevents Iced-specific logic errors caused by invalid data being processed by Iced widgets or the Iced rendering pipeline.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): By validating input within the Iced event loop, you prevent excessively large or malformed input from consuming resources within Iced's rendering or layout processes.
- Code Injection (Low Severity - in most Iced contexts): While Rust mitigates traditional code injection, Iced-specific validation prevents logic-level injection that could manipulate the Iced UI or application state.
-
Impact:
- Logic Errors: Risk significantly reduced within the Iced UI.
- DoS: Risk reduced for DoS attacks targeting the Iced event loop and rendering.
- Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced in typical Iced scenarios.
-
Currently Implemented (Example):
- Basic message passing from
TextInput
toupdate
is likely implemented.
- Basic message passing from
-
Missing Implementation (Example):
- Consistent use of
on_input
for real-time validation might be missing. - Custom widgets might not have thorough validation within their
update
method. - Iced-specific error display using
Text
might be inconsistent.
- Consistent use of
Mitigation Strategy: Strict Message Type Checking (Iced-Specific)
-
Description:
- Central
Message
Enum: Define a Rustenum
that represents all possible messages that can be handled by your Iced application'supdate
function. This is a fundamental part of the Iced architecture. - Specific Message Payloads: Use specific data types within the enum variants to represent the data associated with each message (e.g.,
Message::Increment(u32)
,Message::TextChanged(String)
). Avoid generic types. - Exhaustive
match
inupdate
: In your Iced application'supdate
function, use amatch
statement to handle all possible variants of theMessage
enum. This is enforced by the Rust compiler and is a core part of how Iced applications process events. - Iced Command Handling: Use
Command::none()
or construct appropriateCommand
values within thematch
arms to handle side effects (e.g., fetching data, interacting with the system). This is the Iced-specific way to manage asynchronous operations.
- Central
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Logic Errors (Medium Severity): Prevents Iced-specific logic errors caused by the
update
function receiving and processing unexpected or malformed messages. - Code Injection (Low Severity - in most Iced contexts): Reduces the risk (though already low due to Rust's safety) of an attacker somehow injecting malicious messages into the Iced event loop.
- Logic Errors (Medium Severity): Prevents Iced-specific logic errors caused by the
-
Impact:
- Logic Errors: Risk significantly reduced within the Iced application logic.
- Code Injection: Risk further reduced, though the primary defense is still Rust's memory safety.
-
Currently Implemented (Example):
- A central
Message
enum is likely defined. match
statements are used in theupdate
function.
- A central
-
Missing Implementation (Example):
- Some message variants might use generic types.
- Error handling for unexpected messages (a wildcard
_
arm in thematch
) might be missing.
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Subscription Handling (Iced-Specific)
-
Description:
iced::Subscription
: This strategy focuses specifically on the use oficed::Subscription
for handling external events.- Resource Limits (within Subscription): When creating an
iced::Subscription
, implement limits within the subscription's logic on the resources it can consume. This is crucial for preventing DoS attacks that might try to flood the Iced application with events. For example, if the subscription reads from a network stream, limit the rate at which data is read and processed before it's turned into an Iced message. - Error Handling (within Subscription): Implement robust error handling within the subscription's logic itself. Use
Result
types to handle potential errors and, if necessary, generate an Iced message to notify theupdate
function of the error. - Cancellation (
Subscription::none()
): Ensure that subscriptions can be cancelled properly usingSubscription::none()
when they are no longer needed. This is essential for preventing resource leaks and ensuring that the Iced application doesn't continue processing irrelevant events. This is a core part of managing Iced subscriptions. - Timeout (within Subscription): If subscription is waiting for some external event, implement timeout within the subscription's logic, to avoid indefinite waiting.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming the Iced application with events through
iced::Subscription
. - Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevents Iced subscriptions from consuming excessive resources.
- Logic Errors (Medium Severity): Proper error handling within the subscription prevents Iced-specific logic errors.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming the Iced application with events through
-
Impact:
- DoS: Risk reduced for DoS attacks targeting Iced subscriptions.
- Resource Exhaustion: Risk significantly reduced for Iced-related resource consumption.
- Logic Errors: Risk reduced within the Iced event handling.
-
Currently Implemented (Example):
- Some basic
iced::Subscription
usage might exist.
- Some basic
-
Missing Implementation (Example):
- Resource limits within the subscription logic might be missing.
- Error handling within the subscription might be incomplete.
- Proper cancellation using
Subscription::none()
might be missing. - Timeouts might be missing.