Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
138 lines (98 loc) · 84.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

138 lines (98 loc) · 84.3 KB

Deep Security Analysis of InfluxDB Application

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to identify and evaluate potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with the InfluxDB time-series database system, based on the provided security design review and inferred architecture. The analysis will focus on key components of InfluxDB, data flow, and deployment considerations to provide actionable and tailored security recommendations for the development team.

Scope:

The scope of this analysis encompasses the following aspects of the InfluxDB application, as depicted in the provided diagrams and documentation:

  • Key Components: API Service, Query Engine, and Storage Engine containers within the InfluxDB system.
  • Data Flow: Data ingestion from Monitoring Systems, Applications, and External Time-Series Data Sources, data querying by Visualization Tools and Users.
  • Deployment Environment: Cloud deployment using Kubernetes, including Kubernetes cluster components, services, pods, and persistent storage.
  • Build Process: CI/CD pipeline using GitHub Actions, including code changes, version control, build, testing, scanning, and artifact management.
  • Security Controls: Existing and recommended security controls outlined in the security design review.
  • Risk Assessment: Critical business processes and data sensitivity considerations related to InfluxDB usage.

The analysis will not cover:

  • Detailed code-level vulnerability analysis of the InfluxDB codebase.
  • Penetration testing or dynamic vulnerability scanning of a live InfluxDB deployment (DAST is recommended as a security control, but not performed as part of this analysis).
  • Security of external systems interacting with InfluxDB (Monitoring Systems, Applications, Visualization Tools) beyond their interaction points with InfluxDB.
  • Operational security practices of users deploying and managing InfluxDB beyond provided recommendations.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Document Review: Thorough review of the provided Security Design Review document, including business posture, security posture, security requirements, design diagrams (C4 Context, Container, Deployment, Build), risk assessment, questions, and assumptions.
  2. Architecture Inference: Based on the diagrams and descriptions, infer the architecture, components, and data flow of the InfluxDB application. Focus on understanding the interactions between API Service, Query Engine, and Storage Engine.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential security threats and vulnerabilities for each key component and data flow path, considering common web application and database security risks, as well as risks specific to time-series databases and Kubernetes deployments.
  4. Security Control Mapping: Map existing and recommended security controls from the design review to the identified threats and components. Evaluate the effectiveness and completeness of these controls.
  5. Gap Analysis: Identify security gaps and areas for improvement based on the threat model and security control mapping.
  6. Tailored Recommendations: Develop specific, actionable, and InfluxDB-focused security recommendations and mitigation strategies to address the identified threats and gaps. These recommendations will be tailored to the assumed cloud deployment environment using Kubernetes and medium data sensitivity.
  7. Prioritization: While not explicitly requested, recommendations will be implicitly prioritized based on the severity of the potential risk and ease of implementation.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Based on the Container Diagram and descriptions, the key components of InfluxDB are: API Service, Query Engine, and Storage Engine. Let's analyze the security implications of each:

2.1 API Service Container:

  • Function: Entry point for all external interactions. Handles HTTP API requests for writing and querying data. Responsible for authentication and authorization of API requests.
  • Security Implications:
    • Authentication and Authorization Bypass: Weak or improperly implemented authentication mechanisms could allow unauthorized users to access or modify data. Lack of robust authorization could lead to privilege escalation and unauthorized data access.
    • Input Validation Vulnerabilities (Injection Attacks): If API endpoints do not properly validate input data (data points, query parameters, configuration), they could be vulnerable to injection attacks such as InfluxQL injection, command injection, or cross-site scripting (if error messages are not handled properly).
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Lack of rate limiting or resource management could allow attackers to overwhelm the API service with excessive requests, leading to service unavailability.
    • API Abuse: If authorization is overly permissive, or if API keys/tokens are easily compromised, attackers could abuse the API for malicious purposes, such as data exfiltration or data corruption.
    • Insecure Communication: Failure to enforce HTTPS for API communication would expose sensitive data (authentication credentials, data in transit) to eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks.

2.2 Query Engine Container:

  • Function: Processes and executes InfluxQL queries. Interacts with the Storage Engine to retrieve data.
  • Security Implications:
    • Query Injection (InfluxQL Injection): If the Query Engine does not properly sanitize or parameterize user-provided query inputs, it could be vulnerable to InfluxQL injection attacks. Attackers could manipulate queries to bypass authorization, access unauthorized data, or potentially execute arbitrary code (depending on the query engine's capabilities and vulnerabilities).
    • Denial of Service (Resource Exhaustion): Maliciously crafted or overly complex queries could consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, I/O), leading to performance degradation or denial of service for legitimate users.
    • Information Disclosure: Verbose error messages or improper handling of query errors could leak sensitive information about the database schema, data, or internal system workings.
    • Authorization Bypass during Query Execution: Even if API access is authorized, the Query Engine must enforce authorization at the data level (database, measurement, field) to prevent users from accessing data they are not permitted to see.

2.3 Storage Engine Container:

  • Function: Persistently stores time-series data. Manages data organization, indexing, compression, and retrieval. Enforces data retention policies.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Breach (Unauthorized Data Access): If access controls to the underlying storage are weak or misconfigured, unauthorized users or processes could gain access to sensitive data stored in the database. This is especially critical if encryption at rest is not implemented.
    • Data Corruption or Loss: Software bugs, system failures, or malicious attacks could lead to data corruption or loss. Lack of data integrity checks and robust backup/recovery mechanisms would exacerbate this risk.
    • Lack of Encryption at Rest: If sensitive data is stored without encryption at rest, it is vulnerable to compromise in case of physical media theft, storage system breaches, or insider threats.
    • Insecure Storage Configuration: Misconfigured storage settings, such as overly permissive file permissions or insecure default configurations, could create vulnerabilities.
    • Backup and Recovery Vulnerabilities: Insecure backup storage, weak backup encryption, or vulnerabilities in the recovery process could compromise data confidentiality and integrity.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow Inference

Based on the provided diagrams and descriptions, we can infer the following architecture, components, and data flow:

  • Architecture: InfluxDB is designed as a distributed system, potentially horizontally scalable, with a clear separation of concerns into API, Query, and Storage layers, containerized for deployment in Kubernetes.
  • Components:
    • API Service: Acts as the front-end, receiving requests from external systems (Monitoring Systems, Applications, Visualization Tools). Likely implemented as an HTTP server. Handles authentication, authorization, and request routing.
    • Query Engine: Processes InfluxQL queries. Parses queries, optimizes execution plans, and interacts with the Storage Engine. Likely a separate service communicating with the API Service and Storage Engine.
    • Storage Engine: Manages persistent data storage. Responsible for data indexing, compression, and retrieval. Likely interacts directly with persistent volumes in Kubernetes for data storage.
  • Data Flow:
    1. Data Ingestion: Monitoring Systems, Applications, and External Data Sources send time-series data to the InfluxDB API Service via HTTP API (write requests).
    2. API Processing: API Service authenticates and authorizes the write request, validates the input data, and forwards the data to the Storage Engine for persistence.
    3. Data Storage: Storage Engine receives data from the API Service and stores it persistently in the underlying storage (Persistent Volumes in Kubernetes).
    4. Query Request: Visualization Tools and Users send query requests to the InfluxDB API Service via HTTP API (query requests).
    5. Query Processing: API Service authenticates and authorizes the query request and forwards it to the Query Engine.
    6. Data Retrieval: Query Engine processes the query, interacts with the Storage Engine to retrieve the relevant time-series data.
    7. Result Delivery: Storage Engine returns data to the Query Engine. Query Engine processes and aggregates the data and returns the query results to the API Service.
    8. Response to Client: API Service sends the query results back to the requesting client (Visualization Tools, Users).

This data flow highlights the API Service as the central point of interaction and security enforcement. Security controls must be robust at the API level and propagated down to the Query and Storage Engines to ensure end-to-end security.

4. Specific and Tailored Security Recommendations for InfluxDB

Based on the identified security implications and inferred architecture, here are specific and tailored security recommendations for the InfluxDB project:

4.1 Authentication and Authorization:

  • Recommendation 1: Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Administrative Access: For administrative users who manage InfluxDB configurations and user accounts, enforce MFA to add an extra layer of security against credential compromise.
  • Recommendation 2: Enhance Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Implement granular RBAC that allows control at the database, measurement, and field level as per security requirements. Ensure RBAC policies are consistently enforced across API Service and Query Engine.
  • Recommendation 3: Support Integration with External Authentication Providers: Provide options to integrate with enterprise authentication systems like LDAP, Active Directory, or OAuth providers to streamline user management and leverage existing security infrastructure. This is especially important for enterprise deployments.
  • Recommendation 4: Implement API Token Rotation and Expiration: For API token-based authentication, implement token rotation and expiration policies to limit the lifespan of compromised tokens.

4.2 Input Validation and Query Security:

  • Recommendation 5: Implement Parameterized Queries for InfluxQL: Force or strongly encourage the use of parameterized queries in client libraries and documentation to prevent InfluxQL injection vulnerabilities. Develop secure coding guidelines emphasizing parameterized queries.
  • Recommendation 6: Strict Input Validation on API Endpoints: Implement comprehensive input validation on all API endpoints, including data points, query parameters, and configuration settings. Use allow-lists and data type validation to prevent unexpected or malicious inputs.
  • Recommendation 7: Query Complexity and Resource Limits: Implement mechanisms to limit query complexity and resource consumption (e.g., query timeouts, limits on data points returned, CPU/memory quotas for queries) to prevent DoS attacks through resource exhaustion.

4.3 Cryptography and Data Protection:

  • Recommendation 8: Implement Encryption at Rest: Enable encryption at rest for sensitive data stored in the Storage Engine. Explore options for integrating with Kubernetes secrets management or external key management systems for secure key storage and rotation. Consider using Kubernetes features for encrypting persistent volumes.
  • Recommendation 9: Enforce HTTPS for All API Communication: Strictly enforce HTTPS for all API endpoints to protect data in transit. Provide clear documentation and configuration guidance on enabling and configuring TLS/SSL for InfluxDB API.
  • Recommendation 10: Secure Key Management: Establish secure key management practices for any cryptographic keys used for encryption at rest or in transit. Follow key lifecycle management best practices, including secure generation, storage, rotation, and destruction.

4.4 Deployment and Infrastructure Security:

  • Recommendation 11: Kubernetes Network Policies: Implement Kubernetes Network Policies to segment network traffic and restrict communication between InfluxDB pods and other Kubernetes components. Limit network access to only necessary ports and services.
  • Recommendation 12: Pod Security Policies/Admission Controllers: Enforce Pod Security Policies or Admission Controllers in Kubernetes to restrict container capabilities, prevent privilege escalation, and enforce security best practices for pod deployments.
  • Recommendation 13: Secure Container Images: Harden container images for InfluxDB components by minimizing installed packages, removing unnecessary binaries, and following container security best practices. Regularly scan container images for vulnerabilities and update base images and dependencies.
  • Recommendation 14: Secure Secrets Management in Kubernetes: Utilize Kubernetes Secrets or dedicated secrets management solutions (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) to securely manage sensitive credentials (API tokens, database passwords, encryption keys) used by InfluxDB components. Avoid storing secrets directly in container images or configuration files.

4.5 Logging and Monitoring:

  • Recommendation 15: Robust Security Logging and Auditing: Implement comprehensive logging of security-relevant events, including authentication attempts (successes and failures), authorization decisions, access violations, API requests, and query execution logs. Ensure logs are securely stored and regularly reviewed.
  • Recommendation 16: Security Monitoring and Alerting: Set up security monitoring and alerting for InfluxDB deployments. Monitor logs for suspicious activities, security events, and performance anomalies. Integrate with security information and event management (SIEM) systems if available.

4.6 Build and CI/CD Security:

  • Recommendation 17: Integrate SAST and DAST in CI/CD Pipeline: As recommended in the security review, implement automated SAST and DAST tools in the CI/CD pipeline to identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. Configure these tools to scan for InfluxDB-specific vulnerabilities and common web application security issues.
  • Recommendation 18: Dependency Scanning and Management: Implement automated dependency scanning in the CI/CD pipeline to identify vulnerable third-party libraries. Establish a process for promptly updating vulnerable dependencies. Utilize dependency management tools to track and manage dependencies effectively.
  • Recommendation 19: Container Image Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate container image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline to scan built container images for vulnerabilities before pushing them to the container registry.

5. Actionable and Tailored Mitigation Strategies

For each recommendation, here are actionable and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to InfluxDB:

| Recommendation | Actionable Mitigation Strategy