Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
154 lines (122 loc) · 122 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

154 lines (122 loc) · 122 KB

InfluxDB Security Analysis: Deep Dive

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective: This deep analysis aims to provide a comprehensive security assessment of InfluxDB, focusing on its key components, architecture, data flow, and potential vulnerabilities. The objective is to identify specific security risks and provide actionable mitigation strategies tailored to InfluxDB's design and deployment, particularly within a Kubernetes environment. We will analyze the core components: API, Storage Engine, Query Engine, Web UI, and Task/Alerting Engine.

Scope: This analysis covers InfluxDB versions available on the provided GitHub repository (https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb), including open-source and potentially enterprise features if documented. It focuses on the core database functionality and its interaction with common components like Telegraf, external applications, and monitoring systems. The analysis assumes a Kubernetes deployment, as detailed in the provided design document. It excludes in-depth analysis of specific cloud provider managed services (e.g., InfluxDB Cloud), although general principles will apply. It also excludes a full code review, focusing instead on architectural and design-level vulnerabilities.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Component Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, documentation, and publicly available information about InfluxDB (including its GitHub repository), we will infer the system architecture, data flow, and interactions between components.
  2. Threat Modeling: We will apply threat modeling principles, considering the business and security posture outlined in the design document. We will use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to identify potential threats.
  3. Vulnerability Analysis: For each identified threat, we will analyze potential vulnerabilities in InfluxDB's components and configuration that could allow the threat to be realized. This will include considering known vulnerabilities (CVEs), common attack patterns, and potential weaknesses in the design.
  4. Mitigation Strategies: For each identified vulnerability, we will propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to InfluxDB and its Kubernetes deployment. These strategies will prioritize practical implementation and alignment with industry best practices.
  5. Security Control Mapping: We will map identified vulnerabilities and mitigations to the existing and recommended security controls outlined in the design document.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

We'll analyze each component from the C4 Container diagram, focusing on security implications and potential vulnerabilities.

  • API (HTTP API)

    • Inferred Architecture: The API is likely implemented using Go's standard net/http package or a framework like gorilla/mux. It handles authentication, authorization, request routing, and data serialization/deserialization. It interacts with the Query Engine and, indirectly, the Storage Engine.

    • Security Implications:

      • Authentication Bypass: Vulnerabilities in authentication logic (e.g., improper JWT validation, weak password hashing, session management flaws) could allow attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access.
      • Authorization Bypass: Flaws in RBAC implementation (e.g., incorrect permission checks, privilege escalation vulnerabilities) could allow users to access data or perform actions they are not authorized for.
      • Injection Attacks: Insufficient input validation could lead to various injection attacks, including:
        • InfluxQL Injection: Similar to SQL injection, attackers could craft malicious InfluxQL queries to bypass security controls, access unauthorized data, or even execute arbitrary code.
        • Flux Injection: If Flux is used, similar injection vulnerabilities could exist.
        • Parameter Tampering: Modifying API parameters could lead to unexpected behavior or data manipulation.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The API could be vulnerable to DoS attacks, including:
        • Resource Exhaustion: Sending a large number of requests or computationally expensive queries could overwhelm the API and make it unavailable.
        • Slowloris Attacks: Holding connections open for extended periods could exhaust available connections.
      • Information Disclosure: Error messages or API responses could leak sensitive information about the system's configuration or internal workings.
      • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) Misconfiguration: Improper CORS configuration could allow malicious websites to interact with the API.
      • TLS/SSL Misconfiguration: Weak ciphers, expired certificates, or improper certificate validation could expose API communication to eavesdropping or man-in-the-middle attacks.
      • Rate Limiting Bypass/Absence: Without proper rate limiting, an attacker can flood the API.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Strong Authentication: Enforce strong password policies, implement MFA, and integrate with secure identity providers (LDAP, OAuth 2.0). Use a well-vetted JWT library and follow best practices for JWT validation (e.g., signature verification, expiration checks, audience and issuer validation).
      • Robust Authorization: Implement fine-grained RBAC with least privilege principles. Regularly audit user permissions and ensure that access is granted only to necessary resources. Test authorization logic thoroughly.
      • Input Validation and Sanitization: Strictly validate all user inputs, including query parameters, request bodies, and headers. Use parameterized queries or a query builder to prevent InfluxQL/Flux injection. Sanitize data to prevent XSS vulnerabilities in the Web UI. Employ a whitelist approach to input validation whenever possible.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement robust rate limiting at the API level to prevent DoS attacks. Use different rate limits for different API endpoints and user roles. Consider using a dedicated rate-limiting service or library.
      • Secure Error Handling: Avoid returning sensitive information in error messages. Use generic error messages for client-side errors and log detailed error information internally.
      • Proper CORS Configuration: Configure CORS to allow requests only from trusted origins. Avoid using wildcard origins (*).
      • Secure TLS/SSL Configuration: Use strong TLS/SSL ciphers (e.g., TLS 1.3 with AEAD ciphers). Use valid, trusted certificates. Disable weak or outdated protocols (e.g., SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1). Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).
      • WAF: Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) in front of the API to protect against common web attacks, including injection attacks, XSS, and CSRF.
      • API Gateway: Consider using an API gateway to centralize security controls, such as authentication, authorization, rate limiting, and request transformation.

  • Storage Engine

    • Inferred Architecture: InfluxDB uses a custom-built Time-Structured Merge Tree (TSM) storage engine optimized for time-series data. Data is stored in shards, which are further divided into TSM files. The storage engine handles data compression, indexing, and retention policies.

    • Security Implications:

      • Data at Rest Vulnerability: Without encryption at rest, data stored on disk is vulnerable to unauthorized access if the server is compromised or physical storage is stolen.
      • Data Corruption: Bugs in the storage engine or hardware failures could lead to data corruption or loss.
      • Unauthorized Data Modification: If an attacker gains access to the storage files, they could directly modify or delete data, bypassing API-level security controls.
      • Retention Policy Bypass: An attacker might try to manipulate retention policies to either delete data prematurely or prevent data from being deleted, potentially leading to storage exhaustion or legal issues.
      • Side-Channel Attacks: While less likely, sophisticated attackers could potentially exploit side-channel information (e.g., timing, power consumption) to infer information about the stored data.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Data at Rest Encryption: Implement encryption at rest using a strong encryption algorithm (e.g., AES-256). Use a secure key management system to store and manage encryption keys. InfluxDB Enterprise offers built-in data-at-rest encryption. For the open-source version, consider using filesystem-level encryption (e.g., LUKS on Linux, BitLocker on Windows) or a storage solution that provides encryption (e.g., encrypted EBS volumes on AWS).
      • Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery strategy to protect against data loss due to corruption, hardware failures, or malicious attacks. Store backups in a secure, offsite location. Test the backup and recovery process regularly.
      • File System Permissions: Restrict access to the storage files using appropriate file system permissions. Only the InfluxDB user should have read/write access to the data directory.
      • Integrity Monitoring: Implement file integrity monitoring (FIM) to detect unauthorized modifications to the storage files.
      • Retention Policy Enforcement: Regularly review and audit retention policies to ensure they are being enforced correctly. Implement monitoring to detect attempts to bypass retention policies.
      • Hardware Security: If possible, use hardware security modules (HSMs) to protect encryption keys and other sensitive data.

  • Query Engine

    • Inferred Architecture: The Query Engine parses and executes InfluxQL or Flux queries. It interacts with the Storage Engine to retrieve data and performs any necessary transformations or aggregations.

    • Security Implications:

      • Query Injection: As mentioned in the API section, vulnerabilities in query parsing could allow attackers to inject malicious code and bypass security controls.
      • Resource Exhaustion: Complex or poorly optimized queries could consume excessive resources (CPU, memory), leading to DoS.
      • Information Disclosure: Careless query construction might inadvertently expose sensitive data through error messages or timing analysis.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Input Validation (Parameterized Queries): The most critical mitigation is to prevent query injection through rigorous input validation and the use of parameterized queries or a query builder. This ensures that user-supplied data is treated as data, not as executable code.
      • Query Timeout: Implement query timeouts to prevent long-running or runaway queries from consuming excessive resources.
      • Resource Limits: Configure resource limits (e.g., memory limits, CPU limits) for queries to prevent DoS attacks. InfluxDB allows setting limits on query execution.
      • Query Optimization: Encourage users to write efficient queries. Provide tools and documentation to help users optimize their queries.
      • Regular Expression Limits: If regular expressions are used in queries, limit their complexity and execution time to prevent ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) attacks.

  • Web UI

    • Inferred Architecture: The Web UI is likely a JavaScript-based application that interacts with the InfluxDB API. It provides a graphical interface for querying data, managing configurations, and visualizing data.

    • Security Implications:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If the Web UI does not properly sanitize user inputs or data retrieved from the API, it could be vulnerable to XSS attacks. Attackers could inject malicious scripts that steal user cookies, redirect users to phishing sites, or perform other malicious actions.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): If the Web UI does not implement CSRF protection, attackers could trick users into performing unintended actions, such as changing their password or deleting data.
      • Session Management Vulnerabilities: Weak session management (e.g., predictable session IDs, lack of session expiration) could allow attackers to hijack user sessions.
      • Authentication Bypass: Vulnerabilities in the Web UI's authentication logic could allow attackers to bypass authentication and gain access to the UI.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Input Sanitization: Strictly sanitize all user inputs and data displayed in the Web UI. Use a well-vetted HTML sanitization library to prevent XSS attacks. Encode output appropriately.
      • CSRF Protection: Implement CSRF protection using tokens or other mechanisms. Ensure that all state-changing requests (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE) require a valid CSRF token.
      • Secure Session Management: Use strong, randomly generated session IDs. Set the HttpOnly and Secure flags on session cookies. Implement session expiration and inactivity timeouts.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) to restrict the resources that the Web UI can load. This can help mitigate XSS attacks and other code injection vulnerabilities.
      • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) to ensure that external JavaScript and CSS files have not been tampered with.
      • Regular Updates: Keep the Web UI and its dependencies up to date to patch any known security vulnerabilities.

  • Task/Alerting Engine

    • Inferred Architecture: This component executes scheduled tasks and manages alerting rules. It likely interacts with the Query Engine to evaluate alert conditions and with external systems (e.g., email servers, Slack, PagerDuty) to send notifications.

    • Security Implications:

      • Unauthorized Task Execution: If an attacker gains access to the Task/Alerting Engine, they could create, modify, or delete tasks, potentially leading to data manipulation, DoS, or other malicious actions.
      • Alert Spoofing: Attackers could potentially spoof alerts, causing confusion or triggering unnecessary responses.
      • Credential Exposure: If alert configurations contain sensitive credentials (e.g., API keys, passwords), these credentials could be exposed if the Task/Alerting Engine is compromised.
      • Vulnerabilities in External Integrations: Vulnerabilities in the external systems that InfluxDB integrates with (e.g., email servers, notification services) could be exploited to compromise the alerting system.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Secure Configuration Storage: Store task and alert configurations securely. Avoid storing sensitive credentials directly in the configuration files. Use a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) to store and manage credentials.
      • Input Validation: Validate all user inputs in task and alert configurations to prevent injection attacks.
      • Authentication and Authorization: Implement authentication and authorization for accessing and managing tasks and alerts. Use RBAC to restrict access to specific tasks and alerts.
      • Secure Communication: Use secure communication channels (e.g., TLS/SSL) when interacting with external systems.
      • Regular Auditing: Regularly audit task and alert configurations to ensure they are secure and up to date.
      • Vulnerability Management: Keep the Task/Alerting Engine and its dependencies up to date to patch any known security vulnerabilities. Monitor the security of external integrations and apply updates as needed.

3. Kubernetes-Specific Considerations

Deploying InfluxDB on Kubernetes introduces additional security considerations:

  • Network Policies: Use Kubernetes Network Policies to restrict network traffic between InfluxDB pods and other services in the cluster. Only allow necessary traffic. For example, allow traffic from Telegraf pods to the InfluxDB API, but block traffic from other applications.
  • Pod Security Policies (PSPs) / Pod Security Admission (PSA): Use PSPs (deprecated) or PSA (preferred) to enforce security policies on InfluxDB pods. For example, prevent pods from running as root, restrict the use of host networking and host paths, and require the use of read-only root filesystems.
  • RBAC (Kubernetes RBAC): Use Kubernetes RBAC to control access to InfluxDB resources within the cluster. Grant only necessary permissions to users and service accounts.
  • Secrets Management: Use Kubernetes Secrets to store sensitive credentials, such as API keys and TLS certificates. Avoid storing secrets directly in configuration files or environment variables. Consider using a more robust secrets management solution like HashiCorp Vault, which integrates with Kubernetes.
  • Ingress Controller Security: If using an Ingress controller to expose InfluxDB to external traffic, ensure that the Ingress controller is configured securely. Use TLS/SSL termination, configure appropriate security headers, and implement rate limiting.
  • Resource Quotas: Set resource quotas for the InfluxDB namespace to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
  • Node Security: Secure the underlying Kubernetes nodes. Keep the operating system and Kubernetes components up to date. Use a hardened operating system image. Implement appropriate security controls at the node level (e.g., firewalls, intrusion detection systems).
  • Image Security: Use minimal base images for your InfluxDB containers. Scan container images for vulnerabilities before deploying them. Use a private container registry to store your images.
  • Security Context: Define security context for the containers. Run as non-root user.

4. Mapping to Security Controls

| Vulnerability Category | Specific Vulnerability | Mitigation Strategy

Existing Security Controls:

  • Authentication: InfluxDB supports user authentication (username/password, JWT).
  • Authorization: Role-based access control (RBAC) is implemented.
  • TLS/SSL Encryption: Encryption for client-server and inter-node communication.
  • API Security: Token-based authentication for API endpoints.
  • Input Validation: Validation to prevent injection attacks.
  • Auditing: Some level of request and action logging.

Recommended Security Controls (in addition to existing):

  • Enhanced Auditing: More comprehensive audit logging.
  • IDS/IPS: Intrusion detection/prevention system.
  • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Proactive vulnerability identification.
  • WAF: Web Application Firewall (if exposing API directly).
  • Secrets Management: Integration with a secrets management solution.
  • Data at Rest Encryption: Encryption for data stored on disk.
  • Kubernetes-Specific Controls: Network Policies, Pod Security Admission, RBAC, Secrets Management, Ingress Controller Security, Resource Quotas, Node Security, Image Security, Security Context.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for InfluxDB, focusing on its architecture, components, and deployment within a Kubernetes environment. It highlights potential vulnerabilities and offers specific, actionable mitigation strategies to enhance the security posture of InfluxDB deployments. This analysis is crucial for any organization using InfluxDB to store sensitive time-series data, especially in mission-critical applications. It emphasizes the importance of a layered security approach, combining InfluxDB's built-in security features with external security tools and best practices.