Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
132 lines (101 loc) · 11 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

132 lines (101 loc) · 11 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for kata-containers/kata-containers

Mitigation Strategy: Hypervisor Hardening and Patching (Kata-Specific Aspects)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly update and harden the hypervisor as used by Kata.

  • Description:

    1. Identify the Hypervisor: Determine which hypervisor is configured for use with Kata (QEMU, Cloud Hypervisor, Firecracker) via the Kata configuration.
    2. Kata-Specific Updates: Monitor Kata Containers releases for updates that include hypervisor version bumps or security recommendations related to the hypervisor. Kata often bundles or recommends specific hypervisor versions.
    3. Hypervisor Configuration within Kata: Review the configuration.toml file (or equivalent configuration mechanism) to ensure the hypervisor is configured securely within the context of Kata. This includes paths, resource limits, and any Kata-specific options.
    4. Hypervisor-Specific Security (Kata Context): Explore and enable hypervisor-specific security features that are compatible with and recommended for Kata. For example, seccomp profiles for QEMU that are known to work well with Kata. Firecracker's inherent design is a key example here.
    5. Regular Audits (Kata Focus): Audit the Kata configuration related to the hypervisor, ensuring it aligns with best practices and Kata's recommendations.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Hypervisor Escape (Critical): Vulnerabilities in the hypervisor allowing code execution on the host, bypassing Kata's isolation.
    • Denial of Service (High): A compromised container consuming excessive resources, impacting other Kata containers due to hypervisor-level issues.

  • Impact:

    • Hypervisor Escape: Risk reduced significantly (from Critical to Low/Medium).
    • Denial of Service: Risk reduced (from High to Low).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Kata configuration points to a specific hypervisor version.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated updates based on Kata's recommended hypervisor versions are not fully implemented.
    • Hypervisor-specific security features within the Kata context are not comprehensively utilized.

Mitigation Strategy: Guest Kernel Hardening and Patching (Kata-Specific Aspects)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly update and harden the guest kernel used by Kata.

  • Description:

    1. Kata Guest Image Management: Utilize Kata Containers' mechanisms for managing and updating the guest kernel image. This often involves building custom images or using pre-built images provided by the Kata project.
    2. Minimal Kernel Configuration (Kata-Optimized): Build a custom guest kernel with only the necessary drivers and modules required for Kata's operation. Kata may have specific kernel requirements.
    3. Read-Only Root Filesystem (Kata Integration): Configure the guest kernel, as integrated with Kata, to mount the root filesystem as read-only. This is often handled through Kata's image building process.
    4. Kernel Security Features (Kata Compatibility): Enable kernel security features like KASLR, SMEP, and SMAP, ensuring they are compatible with Kata's runtime environment.
    5. Regular Audits (Kata Image): Audit the process of building and deploying Kata guest kernel images, ensuring security best practices are followed.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Guest Kernel Privilege Escalation (High): Vulnerabilities allowing an attacker to gain root within the Kata VM.
    • Guest-to-Guest Attacks (Medium): If multiple Kata containers share the same guest kernel, a vulnerability in one could affect others (less likely with Kata than traditional containers, but still a consideration).

  • Impact:

    • Guest Kernel Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low/Medium).
    • Guest-to-Guest Attacks: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • A specific guest kernel image is used, as defined in the Kata configuration.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated updates of the Kata guest kernel image are not implemented.
    • Kernel security features are not consistently enabled and tested for Kata compatibility.

Mitigation Strategy: Kata Containers Runtime Configuration

  • Mitigation Strategy: Securely configure the Kata Containers runtime itself.

  • Description:

    1. configuration.toml Review (Comprehensive): Thoroughly review and harden the configuration.toml file (or equivalent). Focus on all settings, paying close attention to:
      • hypervisor: Correct paths, secure configurations, and Kata-specific options.
      • image: Trusted image sources and any Kata-specific image handling.
      • network: Network isolation settings specific to Kata (e.g., how network interfaces are passed to the VM).
      • runtime: Resource limits (CPU, memory, etc.) as enforced by Kata. Security profiles (seccomp, AppArmor) applied to the Kata runtime itself.
    2. Kata Version Updates: Always use the latest stable release of Kata Containers. This is crucial for security fixes.
    3. Resource Limits (Kata-Enforced): Set strict resource limits for each Kata container using Kata's configuration mechanisms. This prevents Kata-specific DoS attacks.
    4. Disable Unnecessary Kata Features: Disable any Kata Containers features that are not absolutely required. This reduces the attack surface of the Kata runtime.
    5. Seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux (for Kata Runtime): Create and apply security profiles (seccomp, AppArmor, or SELinux) to restrict the system calls that the Kata runtime process itself can make. This is distinct from profiles applied inside the container.
    6. Regular Audits (Kata Config): Regularly audit the configuration.toml file and the overall Kata runtime configuration.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Runtime Configuration Exploits (High): Misconfigurations allowing attackers to bypass Kata's isolation or gain unauthorized access through the Kata runtime.
    • Denial of Service (High): Lack of Kata-enforced resource limits allowing a container to consume excessive resources, impacting other Kata containers.
    • Kata-Specific Vulnerabilities (High): Vulnerabilities in the Kata runtime code itself.

  • Impact:

    • Runtime Configuration Exploits: Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low).
    • Denial of Service: Risk reduced significantly (from High to Low).
    • Kata-Specific Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced by staying up-to-date.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic resource limits are set in the Kata configuration.
    • The project uses a relatively recent version of Kata Containers.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A comprehensive security review of the configuration.toml file, specifically focusing on Kata-specific settings, has not been performed recently.
    • Seccomp/AppArmor/SELinux profiles are not fully implemented for the Kata runtime process itself.

Mitigation Strategy: Agent Communication Security

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure the communication between the kata-agent (inside the VM) and the kata-runtime (on the host).

  • Description:

    1. vsock Security (Kata Configuration): Ensure that the vsock communication between the kata-agent and kata-runtime is configured securely within the Kata configuration. This often involves verifying settings in configuration.toml.
    2. Kata Agent Updates: Regularly update the kata-agent to the latest version as part of the Kata Containers release. The agent is a critical component.
    3. Agent Privileges (Minimize within Guest): Minimize the privileges of the kata-agent within the guest VM. It should only have the permissions necessary to perform its tasks, as defined by the Kata design.
    4. Regular Audits (Kata Agent): Audit the kata-agent configuration and its communication with the kata-runtime, focusing on Kata-specific aspects.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Agent Compromise (High): An attacker gaining control of the kata-agent and using it to manipulate the container or potentially escape to the host (if combined with other vulnerabilities).

  • Impact:

    • Agent Compromise: Risk reduced (from High to Medium).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • The project uses a relatively recent version of the kata-agent (as part of the Kata release).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A thorough security review of the vsock configuration within Kata has not been performed.
    • The privileges of the kata-agent within the guest have not been explicitly minimized beyond Kata's defaults.

Mitigation Strategy: Shared Filesystem Security (9pfs - Kata Context)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Securely configure and use shared filesystems (9pfs) if used by Kata.

  • Description:

    1. Minimize Sharing (Kata Mounts): Only share the absolute minimum necessary directories between the host and the guest VM using 9pfs, as configured through Kata. This is typically done via Kata's mount options.
    2. Permissions and Ownership (Kata-Managed): Set strict file permissions and ownership on the shared directories, paying attention to how Kata handles these permissions. Kata may have specific requirements or limitations.
    3. Alternative Mechanisms (Kata Compatibility): Consider using alternative shared filesystem mechanisms (e.g., virtio-fs) if supported by Kata and if they offer better security.
    4. Access Monitoring (Kata-Specific): Monitor access to shared directories, looking for anomalies that might indicate a Kata-related compromise.
    5. Regular Audits (Kata Mounts): Regularly audit the shared filesystem configuration within Kata's configuration and access logs.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure (Medium): An attacker gaining access to sensitive data on the host through a misconfigured Kata-managed shared directory.
    • Privilege Escalation (Medium): An attacker exploiting a vulnerability in the 9pfs implementation as used by Kata to gain elevated privileges.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).
    • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Shared directories are used sparingly, as configured through Kata.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A comprehensive security review of the shared filesystem configuration within the Kata context has not been performed.
    • Access monitoring specifically for Kata-managed shared directories is not in place.