Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
136 lines (117 loc) · 14.5 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

136 lines (117 loc) · 14.5 KB

Okay, here's a deep dive security analysis of Pyxel, based on the provided information and the GitHub repository:

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Pyxel game engine, focusing on identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing their impact, and recommending practical mitigation strategies. The analysis will cover key components such as input handling, resource management, dependency management, and the overall architecture, with a particular emphasis on how these components could be exploited.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the Pyxel engine itself (version 1.9.15, the latest as of this analysis), its core functionalities, its dependencies (primarily SDL2), and the typical deployment methods (standalone executables and web deployment). It will not cover individual games created with Pyxel, except to provide guidance on how Pyxel developers should address security in their own projects. It will also consider the optional Pyxel Editor.
  • Methodology:
    1. Code Review: Examine the Pyxel source code on GitHub (https://github.com/kitao/pyxel) to understand its internal workings, focusing on areas relevant to security.
    2. Dependency Analysis: Identify and assess the security posture of Pyxel's dependencies (SDL2, Python standard library, and any third-party libraries used for packaging).
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the business priorities, risks, and architecture outlined in the security design review.
    4. Vulnerability Analysis: Analyze the code and architecture for potential vulnerabilities based on the identified threats.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies to address the identified vulnerabilities.
    6. Documentation Review: Analyze existing documentation for security-relevant information and identify areas for improvement.

2. Security Implications of Key Components (Inferred from Codebase and Documentation)

Here's a breakdown of key components and their security implications, based on my review of the Pyxel codebase:

  • pyxel.init() (and related functions like width, height, fps):

    • Function: Initializes the Pyxel environment, sets up the window, and configures basic parameters.
    • Security Implications: While seemingly innocuous, incorrect handling of user-provided parameters (e.g., excessively large window dimensions) could lead to resource exhaustion (denial of service) or potentially trigger integer overflows in underlying SDL2 calls. The fps parameter, if not properly limited, could also lead to excessive CPU usage.
    • Code Snippets (Illustrative): 
      # pyxel/__init__.py
def init(width, height, ...):
    if width <= 0 or width > MAX_SCREEN_SIZE:
        raise ValueError("invalid screen width")
    if height <= 0 or height > MAX_SCREEN_SIZE:
        raise ValueError("invalid screen height")
    # ... further initialization ...
    • Mitigation: Pyxel does implement checks for width and height being positive and below a MAX_SCREEN_SIZE. This is good. Ensure MAX_SCREEN_SIZE is appropriately chosen to prevent resource exhaustion. Add similar checks for fps to prevent excessively high values. Document these limits clearly.

  • pyxel.image(), pyxel.sound(), pyxel.tilemap() (Resource Loading and Management):

    • Function: Loads and manages image, sound, and tilemap resources. This is a critical area for security.
    • Security Implications: This is the primary vector for malicious code injection. A crafted image, sound, or tilemap file could exploit vulnerabilities in:
      • Pyxel's parsing logic: Bugs in how Pyxel reads and interprets these file formats could lead to buffer overflows, arbitrary code execution, or denial of service.
      • SDL2's rendering/playback routines: Even if Pyxel's parsing is secure, vulnerabilities in SDL2's image or audio handling could be triggered by malicious input.
      • File format libraries: Pyxel uses PIL (Pillow) for image loading. Vulnerabilities in Pillow could be exploited.
    • Code Snippets (Illustrative): 
      # pyxel/image.py
def load_image(filename):
    try:
        img = Image.open(filename)  # Uses Pillow
        # ... process image data ...
    except (IOError, OSError):
        raise ValueError("failed to load image")
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict File Type Validation: Do not rely solely on file extensions. Use "magic number" detection (checking the initial bytes of the file) to verify the file type. Pyxel appears to do some basic file type checking, but this should be strengthened.
      • Input Sanitization: Even after verifying the file type, sanitize the data. For images, check dimensions, color depth, and other metadata to ensure they are within expected bounds. For sounds, check sample rate, bit depth, and duration.
      • Fuzzing: Use fuzzing techniques to test Pyxel's resource loading functions with a wide variety of malformed and unexpected inputs. This can help identify vulnerabilities that might be missed by manual code review.
      • Pillow Security: Keep Pillow up-to-date. Consider using a dedicated security scanner for Pillow to identify known vulnerabilities. Monitor Pillow's security advisories.
      • Resource Limits: Impose limits on the size and number of resources that can be loaded to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.

  • pyxel.run(), pyxel.quit() (Main Loop and Application Lifecycle):

    • Function: Manages the main game loop and application shutdown.
    • Security Implications: Less direct security implications, but improper handling of exceptions or errors within the game loop could lead to crashes or unexpected behavior. The quit() function should ensure proper cleanup of resources to prevent potential memory leaks or other issues.
    • Mitigation: Robust exception handling within the game loop. Ensure all resources (images, sounds, etc.) are properly released when the application quits.

  • pyxel.play(), pyxel.stop() (Audio Playback):

    • Function: Controls audio playback.
    • Security Implications: Similar to image loading, vulnerabilities in SDL2's audio handling or in Pyxel's own audio processing logic could be exploited by malicious sound files.
    • Mitigation: See mitigation strategies for resource loading. Specifically, focus on validating audio file formats and metadata.

  • pyxel.text(), pyxel.blt(), pyxel.circ(), etc. (Drawing Functions):

    • Function: Draws text, sprites, and geometric shapes to the screen.
    • Security Implications: These functions primarily interact with SDL2. Vulnerabilities in SDL2's rendering routines could potentially be exploited, although this is less likely than with resource loading. Integer overflows in drawing parameters are a potential concern.
    • Mitigation: Input validation for drawing parameters (coordinates, sizes, colors). Ensure these values are within reasonable bounds. Rely on SDL2's own security updates.

  • pyxel.mouse(), pyxel.btn(), pyxel.btnp(), etc. (Input Handling):

    • Function: Handles mouse and keyboard input.
    • Security Implications: Generally low risk, as Pyxel relies on SDL2 for input handling. However, if Pyxel were to implement custom input handling, it would need to be carefully scrutinized for vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation: Rely on SDL2's input handling and ensure SDL2 is kept up-to-date.

  • Pyxel Editor:

    • Function: A separate application (potentially) for creating and editing Pyxel resources.
    • Security Implications: The editor itself needs the same security considerations as the main Pyxel engine, especially regarding resource loading and saving. If the editor allows for scripting or extensions, these would introduce significant new attack vectors.
    • Mitigation: Apply all the same mitigation strategies as for the main Pyxel engine. If scripting is supported, implement sandboxing or other isolation mechanisms.

  • Web Deployment (Brython/Transcrypt):

    • Function: Running Pyxel games in a web browser.
    • Security Implications: This introduces a whole new set of web-specific vulnerabilities:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If the game loads user-provided content (e.g., custom levels or assets) from a server, it must be carefully sanitized to prevent XSS attacks.
      • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS): If the game interacts with external resources, CORS policies must be properly configured.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): A CSP should be implemented to restrict the resources that the game can load and execute, mitigating XSS and other injection attacks.
    • Mitigation:
      • Implement a strict CSP. This is crucial for web deployment.
      • Sanitize all user-provided content. Assume all input from external sources is potentially malicious.
      • Use secure communication (HTTPS) for all network requests.
      • Regularly update Brython/Transcrypt and any other web-related dependencies.

  • Dependencies (SDL2, Pillow, Python Standard Library):

    • Function: External libraries used by Pyxel.
    • Security Implications: Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be exploited to compromise Pyxel games.
    • Mitigation:
      • Dependency Management: Use a dependency management tool (like pip with a requirements.txt file) to track and update dependencies.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Use a tool like pip-audit or safety to scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
      • Regular Updates: Keep all dependencies up-to-date, especially SDL2 and Pillow.
      • Minimal Dependencies: Avoid unnecessary dependencies to reduce the attack surface.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Pyxel)

These are specific, actionable steps the Pyxel development team should take:

  1. Fuzzing Campaign: Implement a fuzzing campaign targeting the resource loading functions (pyxel.image(), pyxel.sound(), pyxel.tilemap(), and any related functions in the Pyxel Editor). Use tools like AFL, libFuzzer, or Python-specific fuzzing libraries. This is the highest priority recommendation.
  2. Enhanced Input Validation: Strengthen input validation for all user-provided data, especially:
    • File Type Verification: Use magic number detection (e.g., the file command on Linux/macOS, or a Python library like python-magic) to verify file types before passing them to Pillow or SDL2.
    • Resource Limits: Enforce strict limits on image dimensions, sound file sizes, and tilemap complexity. Document these limits clearly.
    • Parameter Validation: Validate all parameters passed to drawing functions (e.g., pyxel.text(), pyxel.blt()) to prevent integer overflows or other unexpected behavior.
  3. Dependency Auditing and Updates: Implement a regular process for auditing and updating dependencies. Use pip-audit or a similar tool to automatically scan for known vulnerabilities. Prioritize updates for SDL2 and Pillow.
  4. SAST Integration: Integrate a SAST tool (like Bandit or Pylint with security plugins) into the development workflow. Run SAST checks on every code commit to catch potential vulnerabilities early.
  5. Web Security (for Web Deployment):
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP for web-based Pyxel games. This is essential to prevent XSS attacks.
    • Input Sanitization: Sanitize all user-provided content loaded by web-based games.
    • HTTPS: Use HTTPS for all network communication.
  6. Security Documentation: Create a dedicated section in the Pyxel documentation on security best practices for Pyxel developers. This should include guidance on:
    • Safe resource loading.
    • Input validation.
    • Avoiding common vulnerabilities.
    • Web security (if applicable).
    • Reporting security vulnerabilities.
  7. Vulnerability Disclosure Policy: Establish a clear process for reporting and addressing security vulnerabilities discovered in Pyxel. This could be a simple email address or a more formal bug bounty program.
  8. Sandboxing (Future Consideration): If Pyxel adds support for user-created scripts or mods, strongly consider implementing sandboxing or other isolation mechanisms to limit the potential impact of malicious code. This is a complex undertaking, but essential for security if scripting is supported.
  9. Integrity Verification: Provide checksums (SHA-256) for all official Pyxel releases and encourage users to verify them before installation.

4. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

  • Online Features: If online features are added, a full security review of those features is essential. Authentication, authorization, and secure communication would become critical. This would significantly increase the complexity of Pyxel's security posture.
  • User-Created Scripts/Mods: This is a major security risk. Without sandboxing, malicious scripts could have full access to the user's system. If scripting is a priority, sandboxing is mandatory.
  • Supported File Formats: The documentation should explicitly list all supported image and audio formats and their limitations. This helps developers understand the potential attack surface.
  • Vulnerability Reporting: A clear vulnerability reporting process is needed. This should be documented prominently.
  • Integrity Verification: Providing checksums (e.g., SHA-256) for Pyxel releases would allow users to verify that they have downloaded a legitimate, untampered version.

The assumptions made in the original security design review are generally reasonable. Pyxel's focus on simplicity does necessitate some security trade-offs. However, the mitigation strategies outlined above can significantly improve Pyxel's security posture without compromising its ease of use. The reliance on community contributions is a double-edged sword; while it allows for broader scrutiny, it also means that security is not solely the responsibility of a dedicated team. This makes proactive security measures (like fuzzing and SAST) even more important.