Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (88 loc) · 8.97 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

102 lines (88 loc) · 8.97 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for lemmynet/lemmy

Objective: Gain Unauthorized Administrative Control over a Lemmy Instance

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Gain Unauthorized Administrative Control over a Lemmy Instance
├── 1. Exploit Logic Flaws in Lemmy's Core Functionality
│   ├── 1.1. Abuse Federation Protocol (ActivityPub) [HIGH RISK]
│   │   ├── 1.1.1.  Craft Malicious ActivityPub Messages
│   │   │   ├── 1.1.1.1.  Bypass Signature Verification (if flawed) [CRITICAL]
│   │   │   │   └── 1.1.1.1.1 Inject malicious payloads...
│   │   │   ├── 1.1.1.2.  Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities in ActivityPub Handling [CRITICAL]
│   │   │   │   └── 1.1.1.2.1 Inject objects that trigger...
│   │   └── 1.1.3.  Abuse Federation Trust Relationships
│   │       ├── 1.1.3.1.  Exploit a Vulnerable Federated Instance to Attack Target [HIGH RISK]
│   │       │   └── 1.1.3.1.1 Use a compromised instance...
│   ├── 1.2.  Manipulate User Account Management [HIGH RISK]
│   │   ├── 1.2.1.  Exploit Weaknesses in Password Reset/Recovery
│   │   │   ├── 1.2.1.1.  Bypass Email Verification (if flawed)
│   │   │   │   └── 1.2.1.1.1 Take over existing accounts.
│   │   │   └── 1.2.1.2.  Predict or Brute-Force Reset Tokens
│   │   │       └── 1.2.1.2.1 Gain access to accounts.
│   ├── 1.3.  Exploit Community/Post/Comment Management Logic
│   │   └── 1.3.3  Inject malicious code via image/media uploads [HIGH RISK]
│       │   └── 1.3.3.1 Exploit image processing libraries used by Lemmy [CRITICAL]
│           │    └── 1.3.3.1.1 Achieve remote code execution...
│           └── 1.3.3.2 Bypass file type validation...
│                └── 1.3.3.2.1 Upload executable files...
│   └── 1.4 Exploit API Endpoints [HIGH RISK]
│       └── 1.4.2 Inject Malicious Input into API Parameters [CRITICAL]
│           └── 1.4.2.1 Exploit vulnerabilities in API parameter handling.
│               └── 1.4.2.1.1 Trigger unexpected behavior...
└── 2. Exploit Implementation-Specific Vulnerabilities (Rust/Actix)
    └── 2.3.  Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Dependencies [HIGH RISK]
        └── 2.3.1.  Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Lemmy [CRITICAL]
            └── 2.3.1.1.  Leverage publicly disclosed CVEs in dependencies.
                └── 2.3.1.1.1 Achieve RCE, data breaches...

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Abuse Federation Protocol (ActivityPub) [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in Lemmy's implementation of the ActivityPub protocol, which handles communication with other federated instances.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.1.1.1. Bypass Signature Verification (if flawed) [CRITICAL]:
      • Description: If the signature verification process for ActivityPub messages is flawed, an attacker could forge messages from other instances, bypassing authentication.
      • Impact: Very High (RCE, full control)
      • Mitigation: Rigorous testing and auditing of the signature verification implementation. Ensure adherence to ActivityPub specifications. Use well-vetted cryptographic libraries.
    • 1.1.1.2. Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities in ActivityPub Handling [CRITICAL]:
      • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how Lemmy deserializes (converts from a serialized format like JSON) ActivityPub messages. Attackers could inject malicious objects that trigger unintended code execution.
      • Impact: Very High (RCE)
      • Mitigation: Avoid deserializing untrusted data whenever possible. If deserialization is necessary, use safe deserialization libraries and techniques. Implement strict input validation before deserialization. Consider using a schema validation library.
    • 1.1.3.1. Exploit a Vulnerable Federated Instance to Attack Target [HIGH RISK]:
      • Description: Compromising a different Lemmy instance (or other ActivityPub-compatible software) and using that compromised instance to send malicious requests or updates to the target instance.
      • Impact: High (depends on the actions performed)
      • Mitigation: Implement robust monitoring of federation traffic. Consider implementing a reputation system for federated instances. Be prepared to defederate from instances that exhibit suspicious behavior.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2. Manipulate User Account Management [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Exploiting weaknesses in the user account creation, login, and password management processes.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.2.1.1. Bypass Email Verification (if flawed):
      • Description: Circumventing the email verification step during password reset, allowing an attacker to take over an account without access to the associated email.
      • Impact: High (account takeover)
      • Mitigation: Ensure that email verification is mandatory and cannot be bypassed. Use unique, cryptographically secure tokens for email verification links. Implement short expiration times for verification links.
    • 1.2.1.2. Predict or Brute-Force Reset Tokens:
      • Description: Guessing or brute-forcing the tokens used for password reset links.
      • Impact: High (account takeover)
      • Mitigation: Use long, randomly generated tokens with high entropy. Implement strict rate limiting on password reset attempts. Consider using account lockout policies after multiple failed attempts.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3.3. Inject Malicious Code via Image/Media Uploads [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Uploading malicious files disguised as images or other media to exploit vulnerabilities in image processing or file handling.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.3.3.1. Exploit image processing libraries used by Lemmy [CRITICAL]:
      • Description: Leveraging known or zero-day vulnerabilities in the image processing libraries used by Lemmy (e.g., ImageMagick, libvips) to achieve remote code execution.
      • Impact: Very High (RCE)
      • Mitigation: Keep image processing libraries up-to-date with the latest security patches. Consider sandboxing image processing to limit the impact of potential exploits. Use a minimal set of image processing features. Validate image dimensions and other metadata before processing.
    • 1.3.3.2 Bypass file type validation:
      • Description: Uploading executable files that are disguised as images by manipulating file extensions or content types.
      • Impact: Very High (RCE)
      • Mitigation: Implement strict file type validation based on file content, not just extensions. Use a whitelist of allowed file types. Store uploaded files outside of the web root. Scan uploaded files with antivirus software.

Attack Tree Path: 1.4. Exploit API Endpoints [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Attacking the Lemmy API to gain unauthorized access or perform malicious actions.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.4.2. Inject Malicious Input into API Parameters [CRITICAL]:
      • Description: Providing crafted input to API parameters to exploit vulnerabilities in how the API handles that input (e.g., SQL injection, command injection, path traversal).
      • Impact: High to Very High (depends on the vulnerability)
      • Mitigation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all API parameters. Use parameterized queries or ORMs to prevent SQL injection. Avoid using user input directly in system commands. Validate file paths and URLs to prevent path traversal.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3. Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Dependencies [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in the libraries and frameworks that Lemmy depends on.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • 2.3.1. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Lemmy [CRITICAL]:
      • Description: Leveraging publicly disclosed vulnerabilities (CVEs) in Lemmy's dependencies to achieve various impacts, including RCE, data breaches, and denial of service.
      • Impact: Varies (depends on the CVE) - Can be Very High
      • Mitigation: Maintain an up-to-date Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities using tools like cargo audit, dependabot, or OWASP Dependency-Check. Apply security patches promptly. Consider using a dependency management system that automatically updates dependencies to secure versions.