Attack Surface: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Client-Side Rendering
- Description: Injecting malicious scripts into web pages, executed by other users' browsers, due to improper handling of user-provided data during client-side rendering.
- Leptos Contribution: If Leptos components dynamically render user input on the client-side without proper sanitization, XSS vulnerabilities can occur. Leptos's reactivity system and component model can lead to client-side DOM manipulation based on user data if not handled carefully.
- Example: A user submits a comment containing
<script>alert('XSS')</script>
. If this comment is rendered directly into the DOM by a Leptos component without escaping, the script will execute in other users' browsers viewing the comment. - Impact: Account compromise, data theft, malware distribution, website defacement.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Context-Aware Output Encoding: Use Leptos's built-in mechanisms or libraries to properly encode user input before rendering it in HTML contexts. Ensure encoding is context-aware (HTML escaping, JavaScript escaping, URL escaping, etc.).
- Content Security Policy (CSP): CSP can help mitigate the impact of XSS by restricting the sources from which scripts can be executed.
- Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Identify and fix potential XSS vulnerabilities in client-side rendering logic.
Attack Surface: Server Function Vulnerabilities
-
Description: A broad category encompassing vulnerabilities within Leptos server functions, which expose server-side logic to the client. This is a direct attack surface introduced by Leptos's full-stack capabilities.
-
Leptos Contribution: Leptos server functions are a core feature that directly connects client-side interactions to server-side logic, creating a significant attack surface if not secured properly. The ease of defining and calling server functions in Leptos can inadvertently lead to security oversights if developers are not vigilant.
-
2.1 Serialization/Deserialization Issues:
- Description: Vulnerabilities arising from insecure handling of data serialization and deserialization between client and server functions.
- Leptos Contribution: Leptos handles serialization and deserialization for server function arguments and return values. If not implemented securely within Leptos or if user code introduces vulnerabilities during custom serialization, issues can arise.
- Example: Deserializing untrusted data in a server function without proper validation could lead to code execution or other vulnerabilities if the deserialization process is flawed.
- Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), data corruption, denial of service.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Input Validation: Thoroughly validate all data received by server functions before deserialization and processing.
- Secure Serialization Libraries: Use secure and well-vetted serialization libraries if custom serialization is needed. Rely on Leptos's built-in serialization where possible and understand its security implications.
- Principle of Least Privilege: Minimize the privileges of the server function execution environment.
-
2.2 Authentication and Authorization Bypass:
- Description: Lack of or flawed authentication and authorization checks in server functions, allowing unauthorized access.
- Leptos Contribution: Leptos provides the mechanism for server functions, but enforcing authentication and authorization is the developer's responsibility. If developers fail to implement these checks within server functions, it becomes a direct Leptos-related vulnerability due to the framework's encouragement of this client-server interaction pattern.
- Example: A server function intended for administrators lacks authentication. An attacker can directly call this function from the client and perform administrative actions.
- Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data, data breaches, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement Authentication: Use robust authentication mechanisms within server functions to verify user identity before allowing access. Leptos provides context and tools to facilitate this, but developers must implement the logic.
- Implement Authorization: Enforce authorization checks within server functions to ensure users only access resources and actions they are permitted to.
- Principle of Least Privilege: Grant server functions only the necessary permissions to perform their tasks.
-
2.3 Injection Attacks in Server Functions:
- Description: Injection vulnerabilities (SQL injection, command injection, etc.) in server functions due to improper handling of user-provided data when interacting with backend systems.
- Leptos Contribution: Leptos server functions facilitate direct interaction with backend systems. If developers don't sanitize user input within these functions, the framework's ease of backend access contributes to the attack surface.
- Example: A server function constructs a SQL query using user input without proper sanitization. An attacker can inject malicious SQL code to manipulate the database.
- Impact: Data breaches, data manipulation, unauthorized access to backend systems, potential for remote code execution on the server.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Use parameterized queries or prepared statements for database interactions to prevent SQL injection.
- Input Sanitization and Validation: Sanitize and validate all user input received by server functions before using it in backend system interactions.
- Principle of Least Privilege: Minimize the privileges of the database user or system account used by server functions.
-