Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
52 lines (44 loc) · 6.37 KB

File metadata and controls

52 lines (44 loc) · 6.37 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for leptos-rs/leptos

  • Description: Injecting malicious scripts into web pages, executed by other users' browsers, due to improper handling of user-provided data during client-side rendering.
  • Leptos Contribution: If Leptos components dynamically render user input on the client-side without proper sanitization, XSS vulnerabilities can occur. Leptos's reactivity system and component model can lead to client-side DOM manipulation based on user data if not handled carefully.
  • Example: A user submits a comment containing <script>alert('XSS')</script>. If this comment is rendered directly into the DOM by a Leptos component without escaping, the script will execute in other users' browsers viewing the comment.
  • Impact: Account compromise, data theft, malware distribution, website defacement.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Context-Aware Output Encoding: Use Leptos's built-in mechanisms or libraries to properly encode user input before rendering it in HTML contexts. Ensure encoding is context-aware (HTML escaping, JavaScript escaping, URL escaping, etc.).
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): CSP can help mitigate the impact of XSS by restricting the sources from which scripts can be executed.
    • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Identify and fix potential XSS vulnerabilities in client-side rendering logic.
  • Description: A broad category encompassing vulnerabilities within Leptos server functions, which expose server-side logic to the client. This is a direct attack surface introduced by Leptos's full-stack capabilities.

  • Leptos Contribution: Leptos server functions are a core feature that directly connects client-side interactions to server-side logic, creating a significant attack surface if not secured properly. The ease of defining and calling server functions in Leptos can inadvertently lead to security oversights if developers are not vigilant.

    • 2.1 Serialization/Deserialization Issues:

      • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from insecure handling of data serialization and deserialization between client and server functions.
      • Leptos Contribution: Leptos handles serialization and deserialization for server function arguments and return values. If not implemented securely within Leptos or if user code introduces vulnerabilities during custom serialization, issues can arise.
      • Example: Deserializing untrusted data in a server function without proper validation could lead to code execution or other vulnerabilities if the deserialization process is flawed.
      • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), data corruption, denial of service.
      • Risk Severity: Critical
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Input Validation: Thoroughly validate all data received by server functions before deserialization and processing.
        • Secure Serialization Libraries: Use secure and well-vetted serialization libraries if custom serialization is needed. Rely on Leptos's built-in serialization where possible and understand its security implications.
        • Principle of Least Privilege: Minimize the privileges of the server function execution environment.
    • 2.2 Authentication and Authorization Bypass:

      • Description: Lack of or flawed authentication and authorization checks in server functions, allowing unauthorized access.
      • Leptos Contribution: Leptos provides the mechanism for server functions, but enforcing authentication and authorization is the developer's responsibility. If developers fail to implement these checks within server functions, it becomes a direct Leptos-related vulnerability due to the framework's encouragement of this client-server interaction pattern.
      • Example: A server function intended for administrators lacks authentication. An attacker can directly call this function from the client and perform administrative actions.
      • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data, data breaches, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation.
      • Risk Severity: Critical
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Implement Authentication: Use robust authentication mechanisms within server functions to verify user identity before allowing access. Leptos provides context and tools to facilitate this, but developers must implement the logic.
        • Implement Authorization: Enforce authorization checks within server functions to ensure users only access resources and actions they are permitted to.
        • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant server functions only the necessary permissions to perform their tasks.
    • 2.3 Injection Attacks in Server Functions:

      • Description: Injection vulnerabilities (SQL injection, command injection, etc.) in server functions due to improper handling of user-provided data when interacting with backend systems.
      • Leptos Contribution: Leptos server functions facilitate direct interaction with backend systems. If developers don't sanitize user input within these functions, the framework's ease of backend access contributes to the attack surface.
      • Example: A server function constructs a SQL query using user input without proper sanitization. An attacker can inject malicious SQL code to manipulate the database.
      • Impact: Data breaches, data manipulation, unauthorized access to backend systems, potential for remote code execution on the server.
      • Risk Severity: Critical
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements: Use parameterized queries or prepared statements for database interactions to prevent SQL injection.
        • Input Sanitization and Validation: Sanitize and validate all user input received by server functions before using it in backend system interactions.
        • Principle of Least Privilege: Minimize the privileges of the database user or system account used by server functions.