Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
69 lines (54 loc) · 7.03 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

69 lines (54 loc) · 7.03 KB

Threat Model Analysis for mimblewimble/grin

Threat: Transaction Building Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Bugs in the application's Grin transaction building logic (code implementing Grin transaction creation) could lead to malformed transactions. An attacker exploiting these bugs could cause transaction failures, loss of funds if malformed transactions are broadcast, or application crashes.
  • Impact: Loss of funds, transaction failures, application instability, potential denial of service.
  • Grin Component Affected: Application's Grin Transaction Building Module/Functions, Grin Wallet Libraries Integration.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Level: Thoroughly test transaction building logic with unit and integration tests. Use well-vetted Grin libraries/SDKs. Implement robust input validation and error handling. Conduct code audits of transaction building components.

Threat: Key Management Vulnerabilities (Grin Wallet)

  • Description: Insecure key generation, storage, or handling within the application's Grin wallet integration. An attacker gaining access to the application's storage or exploiting vulnerabilities in key handling could steal private keys.
  • Impact: Complete loss of Grin funds associated with compromised private keys. User account compromise.
  • Grin Component Affected: Application's Grin Wallet Integration, Key Generation, Key Storage, Key Handling Modules.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Level: Use secure key generation libraries. Encrypt private keys at rest and in transit. Consider hardware wallets or secure enclaves for key management. Implement strong access controls for key storage. Follow cryptographic key management best practices. Regularly audit key management implementation.

Threat: Eclipse Attacks on Grin Node

  • Description: Attacker isolates the application's Grin node from the legitimate network by surrounding it with malicious peers. The attacker can then manipulate the node's view of the blockchain, potentially leading to double-spending or denial of service.
  • Impact: Double-spending vulnerabilities, denial of service, manipulation of application data based on false blockchain view.
  • Grin Component Affected: Grin Node (P2P Networking, Peer Selection).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Level: Implement best practices for Grin node security: limit inbound connections, use peer filtering, monitor network connectivity and peer list. Utilize diverse and reputable peer lists. Regularly review peer connections.
    • Infrastructure Level: Firewall to restrict inbound connections to the Grin node.

Threat: Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks on Grin Node

  • Description: Attacker floods the application's Grin node with network traffic or malicious requests, overwhelming its resources and causing it to become unresponsive or unavailable. This could target P2P networking, transaction processing, or API endpoints.
  • Impact: Application downtime, inability to process Grin transactions, degraded user experience, potential financial losses if application is transaction-dependent.
  • Grin Component Affected: Grin Node (P2P Networking, Transaction Processing, API Endpoints if exposed).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Infrastructure Level: Implement rate limiting, firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems. Use DDoS protection services. Ensure sufficient resources to handle expected load and attack traffic.
    • Application Level: Implement input validation and sanitization to prevent application-level DoS vulnerabilities.

Threat: Cryptographic Vulnerabilities in Grin's Cryptography

  • Description: Undiscovered vulnerabilities in the cryptographic primitives used by Grin (Mimblewimble, Schnorr, Cuckatoo). If discovered and exploited, these could undermine the security of the entire Grin system.
  • Impact: Catastrophic failure of Grin's security, potential loss of all Grin funds, network collapse.
  • Grin Component Affected: Grin Protocol (Cryptography - Mimblewimble, Schnorr Signatures, Cuckatoo PoW).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Level: Stay informed about Grin security audits and protocol updates. No direct application mitigation, rely on Grin core team and community.
    • Grin Core Team: Rigorous security audits by independent cryptographers. Continuous monitoring of cryptographic research and potential vulnerabilities. Prompt patching of any discovered vulnerabilities.

Threat: Bugs in Grin Core Software (grin-node, grin-wallet)

  • Description: Bugs in the Grin core software (node and wallet implementations) could lead to unexpected behavior, security vulnerabilities, or instability. Exploiting these bugs could lead to node crashes, data corruption, or security breaches.
  • Impact: Application instability, data corruption, potential security vulnerabilities, denial of service, unpredictable behavior.
  • Grin Component Affected: Grin Core Software (grin-node, grin-wallet).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Level: Use stable and well-tested versions of Grin software. Stay updated on Grin releases and security patches. Monitor Grin community channels for bug reports and security advisories. Implement robust error handling and monitoring in the application to detect and respond to unexpected Grin node behavior.

Threat: Mining Related Attacks (51% Attack, Selfish Mining)

  • Description: Attacks on the Grin mining process, such as a 51% attack (gaining control of >50% of mining power) or selfish mining (strategic withholding of blocks), could destabilize the Grin network. A 51% attack allows transaction censorship and double-spending. Selfish mining can reduce network fairness and efficiency.
  • Impact: Network instability, transaction censorship, double-spending vulnerabilities (in 51% attack scenario), reduced network confidence, potential devaluation of Grin.
  • Grin Component Affected: Grin Network (Mining, Consensus Mechanism).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Level: Monitor Grin network health and mining centralization. No direct application mitigation, rely on Grin network security and decentralization. Be aware of network hash rate and distribution.
    • Grin Community/Ecosystem: Promote decentralized mining. Encourage diverse mining pools. Develop and implement mitigations against selfish mining if necessary.