Threat: Expression Injection
- Description: Attacker provides malicious input directly incorporated into Polars expressions (e.g., filter conditions). By crafting expressions, they can bypass security checks, access unauthorized data, or cause errors.
- Impact: Data breach, unauthorized access, data manipulation, denial of service.
- Polars Component Affected: Polars expression engine, functions like
filter
,select
,groupby
,agg
. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Avoid direct user input in Polars expressions.
- Use parameterized queries or safe expression building methods.
- Sanitize and validate user input before expression incorporation.
- Enforce strict input validation and whitelisting for expression components.
- Description: Attacker provides malicious files in formats like Parquet or Arrow IPC. Exploiting vulnerabilities in Polars' deserialization libraries can lead to remote code execution or denial of service.
- Impact: Remote code execution, denial of service, data corruption.
- Polars Component Affected:
polars.read_parquet
,polars.read_ipc
, underlying deserialization libraries (e.g.,arrow2
). - Risk Severity: High to Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Keep Polars and deserialization libraries updated.
- Sanitize and validate file inputs before processing.
- Implement file type validation and restrict allowed formats.
- Consider sandboxing Polars processing.
- Description: Attacker causes the application to process excessively large datasets, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service.
- Impact: Denial of service, application instability.
- Polars Component Affected: Polars core data processing engine, memory management.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement resource limits and quotas for data processing.
- Use Polars' chunking and streaming capabilities.
- Monitor memory usage and implement alerts.
- Design applications to handle large datasets gracefully.
- Implement input size limits and validation.
- Description: Attacker injects malicious code into custom functions used with
apply
ormap_elements
if these functions are dynamically generated or accept unsanitized user input. - Impact: Code execution, data manipulation, privilege escalation.
- Polars Component Affected:
apply
andmap_elements
functions, custom function execution. - Risk Severity: High to Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Avoid dynamic generation of custom functions based on user input.
- Strictly sanitize and validate user input if dynamic functions are necessary.
- Thoroughly review and test custom functions.
- Limit usage of
apply
andmap_elements
to trusted code paths.
- Description: Bugs in custom functions used with
apply
ormap_elements
can lead to data corruption or unexpected behavior, potentially causing security breaches. - Impact: Data corruption, unexpected application behavior, potential security breaches.
- Polars Component Affected:
apply
andmap_elements
functions, custom function logic. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Thoroughly test and review custom functions.
- Implement unit and integration tests for custom functions.
- Follow secure coding practices in custom functions.
- Consider code reviews for custom functions.
- Description: Undiscovered bugs in Polars core logic could be exploited to cause data corruption, unexpected behavior, or security breaches.
- Impact: Data corruption, unexpected application behavior, potential security breaches.
- Polars Component Affected: Polars core data processing engine, various modules and functions.
- Risk Severity: High to Critical (potential depending on bug nature)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Stay updated with Polars releases and security advisories.
- Report suspected bugs to the Polars team.
- Implement robust error handling and input validation in the application.
- Consider fuzzing or other testing techniques.