Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (45 loc) · 8.65 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (45 loc) · 8.65 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for rayon-rs/rayon

Attack Surface: Thread Pool Exhaustion / Denial of Service (DoS)

  • Description: An attacker can overwhelm the application by causing excessive thread creation or saturation of Rayon's thread pool, leading to resource exhaustion and preventing legitimate requests from being processed.
  • Rayon Contribution: Rayon manages a thread pool for parallel execution. Uncontrolled or unbounded parallel task creation within application logic using Rayon directly leads to potential thread pool exhaustion.
  • Example: An API endpoint uses Rayon to process user-uploaded files in parallel. A malicious user sends a flood of requests with large files, triggering a massive number of parallel processing tasks. This saturates Rayon's thread pool, making the API unresponsive to legitimate users.
  • Impact: Denial of Service, application unavailability, performance degradation for legitimate users.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Limits on Parallel Tasks: Implement strict limits on the number of parallel tasks spawned by Rayon, based on system resources or predefined thresholds.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Thoroughly validate and sanitize user inputs that influence the degree of parallelism. Prevent direct user control over thread counts or task numbers.
    • Rayon Thread Pool Configuration: Configure Rayon's thread pool with maximum thread limits to prevent unbounded thread creation and resource exhaustion.
    • Rate Limiting for Parallel Operations: Implement rate limiting on API endpoints or operations that trigger parallel processing to control the incoming request rate and prevent thread pool overload.

Attack Surface: Data Races and Race Conditions (Increased Risk)

  • Description: Incorrectly managing shared mutable state within parallel operations facilitated by Rayon can lead to data races and race conditions, causing data corruption, inconsistent application state, or exploitable vulnerabilities.
  • Rayon Contribution: Rayon enables and simplifies parallel execution, inherently increasing the complexity of concurrent code. This heightened concurrency directly increases the risk of introducing data races and race conditions if shared mutable data is not carefully managed within Rayon's parallel contexts.
  • Example: A financial transaction processing system uses Rayon to parallelize transaction validation. If multiple parallel tasks concurrently access and modify shared account balances without proper synchronization mechanisms (like Mutexes), race conditions can occur, leading to incorrect balance updates and potential financial discrepancies or fraud.
  • Impact: Data corruption, inconsistent application state, potential for privilege escalation, unauthorized access, or financial loss if race conditions affect security-critical logic or data.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize Shared Mutable State in Parallel Code: Design parallel algorithms to minimize or eliminate shared mutable state. Favor immutable data structures and message passing techniques where possible.
    • Employ Rust's Synchronization Primitives: Utilize Rust's concurrency primitives (e.g., Mutex, RwLock, Atomic) correctly and consistently to protect all shared mutable data accessed within Rayon's parallel sections.
    • Rigorous Code Reviews and Concurrency Testing: Conduct thorough code reviews specifically focused on concurrent code sections using Rayon. Implement dedicated concurrency testing strategies to identify and eliminate race conditions.
    • Static Analysis and Race Detection Tools: Integrate static analysis tools and runtime race detectors (like ThreadSanitizer) into the development and testing pipeline to proactively identify and prevent data races.

Attack Surface: Panic Handling in Parallel Contexts (Potential for Information Disclosure or Critical State Corruption)

  • Description: Unhandled panics within Rayon's parallel tasks can lead to unexpected application termination, inconsistent state, or information disclosure through error messages, potentially creating exploitable conditions.
  • Rayon Contribution: Rayon manages the execution of parallel tasks. Panics occurring within these tasks, if not explicitly handled, can propagate and disrupt the application's overall state in ways that are specific to parallel execution environments managed by Rayon.
  • Example: An e-commerce platform uses Rayon to process product recommendations in parallel. If a panic occurs in a parallel recommendation task due to a corrupted product database entry, the error message might inadvertently expose database schema details or internal server paths to a user if not properly handled and sanitized. Furthermore, a critical panic in a core parallel task might leave the recommendation engine in a broken state, impacting functionality.
  • Impact: Information disclosure, inconsistent application state, potential for further exploitation based on revealed information, application instability, functional disruption.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Comprehensive Error Handling in Parallel Tasks: Implement robust error handling within all parallel tasks using Result and handle errors gracefully. Avoid allowing panics to propagate unexpectedly from Rayon tasks.
    • Panic Hooks and Secure Logging: Set up panic hooks to catch panics in Rayon tasks, log them securely (without revealing sensitive information in logs), and implement controlled recovery or shutdown procedures if necessary.
    • Sanitize Error Messages and Responses: Ensure that error messages displayed to users or logged do not reveal sensitive internal details, especially when dealing with panics originating from parallel tasks processing user input or internal data.
    • Resilient Application Design: Design the application to be resilient to panics in parallel tasks. Implement mechanisms to prevent inconsistent state or security breaches in case of unexpected errors in parallel execution.

Attack Surface: Resource Consumption Amplification (Leading to DoS)

  • Description: Rayon's parallel execution can amplify resource consumption (CPU, memory, etc.). Attackers can exploit this amplification to cause excessive resource usage, leading to performance degradation or Denial of Service.
  • Rayon Contribution: Rayon is designed to maximize CPU utilization through parallelism. If parallel operations are applied to resource-intensive tasks without proper safeguards, Rayon directly contributes to the potential for amplified resource consumption under malicious or excessive workloads.
  • Example: A batch processing system uses Rayon to parallelize data analysis jobs. A malicious user submits a crafted job designed to be computationally expensive and highly parallelizable. Rayon efficiently executes this job across all available cores, leading to a spike in CPU usage that starves other critical system processes and potentially causes a system-wide Denial of Service.
  • Impact: Performance degradation, resource exhaustion, Denial of Service, system instability, increased operational costs.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Resource Quotas and Limits for Parallel Operations: Implement resource quotas and limits specifically for operations that utilize Rayon. Limit the size of data processed in parallel, the complexity of computations, and the maximum execution time for parallel tasks.
    • Input Size and Complexity Validation: Validate and strictly limit the size and computational complexity of user inputs that are processed in parallel to prevent resource exhaustion from maliciously crafted inputs.
    • Resource Monitoring and Alerting with Automated Response: Implement real-time resource monitoring for applications using Rayon. Set up alerts to detect unusual resource consumption patterns and trigger automated responses like throttling or job cancellation to prevent resource exhaustion.
    • Workload Management and Prioritization: Implement workload management and task prioritization mechanisms to ensure fair resource allocation and prevent single resource-intensive parallel operations from monopolizing system resources.