Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
215 lines (165 loc) · 25.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

215 lines (165 loc) · 25.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for rayon-rs/rayon

Objective: Compromise an application using Rayon by exploiting vulnerabilities related to Rayon's parallel execution and resource management.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Rayon Application (Execute Code/DoS) └───[AND] Exploit Rayon-Specific Vulnerabilities ├───[OR] 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Rayon Library Itself │ └─── 1.2. Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities in Rayon's Dependencies (Indirect) [CRITICAL NODE] │ └─── 1.2.1. Identify and Exploit Vulnerabilities in Crates Rayon Depends On [CRITICAL NODE] │ └─── Insight: Regularly audit and update dependencies of Rayon and the application itself. Use tools for dependency vulnerability scanning. └───[OR] 2. Exploit Misuse of Rayon API in Application Code [HIGH RISK PATH] ├─── 2.1. Introduce Data Races through Incorrect Parallelization [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH] │ ├─── 2.1.1. Share Mutable Data Across Threads Without Proper Synchronization [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── 2.1.1.1. Exploit Race Conditions in Shared Data Structures [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ │ └─── Insight: Thoroughly review all code sections using Rayon's parallel iterators and operations. Enforce data immutability where possible. Use appropriate synchronization primitives (Mutexes, RwLocks, Channels) when sharing mutable data is necessary. │ │ └─── 2.1.1.2. Cause Undefined Behavior due to Data Races [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └─── Insight: Utilize Rust's borrow checker effectively. Employ static analysis tools to detect potential data races. Test parallel code rigorously with tools like ThreadSanitizer. ├─── 2.2. Resource Exhaustion through Parallelism Abuse [HIGH RISK PATH] │ ├─── 2.2.1. Trigger Excessive Parallel Task Creation [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └─── 2.2.1.1. Provide Inputs Leading to Fork Bomb-like Behavior in Parallel Loops [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └─── Insight: Implement input validation and resource limits for operations that trigger parallel tasks. Avoid unbounded parallelism based on external input. │ ├─── 2.2.2. Exploit Inefficient Parallel Algorithms [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └─── 2.2.2.1. Craft Inputs that Degrade Parallel Performance to Serial or Worse [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └─── Insight: Benchmark and profile parallel algorithms with various input sizes and distributions to identify potential performance bottlenecks and DoS vectors. │ └─── 2.2.3. Memory Exhaustion due to Parallel Data Processing [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └─── 2.2.3.1. Provide Large Inputs that Cause Excessive Memory Allocation in Parallel Operations [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └─── Insight: Implement memory limits and resource quotas for parallel processing. Use streaming or iterative approaches for large datasets instead of loading everything into memory at once. └─── 2.3. Logic Errors in Parallel Code Leading to Security Flaws [CRITICAL NODE] └─── 2.3.1. Incorrect Synchronization Logic Leading to Authorization/Authentication Bypass [CRITICAL NODE] └─── 2.3.1.1. Exploit Race Conditions in Access Control Decisions Made in Parallel └─── Insight: Carefully review and test authorization and authentication logic within parallel code. Ensure atomicity and proper synchronization for security-critical operations.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1. Identify and Exploit Vulnerabilities in Crates Rayon Depends On [CRITICAL NODE]

1.2.1. Identify and Exploit Vulnerabilities in Crates Rayon Depends On [CRITICAL NODE]:

  • Attack Vector: Attackers can scan the dependencies of the Rayon library for known vulnerabilities in publicly available databases (like CVE databases). If a vulnerable dependency is identified, attackers can attempt to exploit this vulnerability through the application that uses Rayon.
  • Mechanism: This is an indirect attack. The vulnerability is not in Rayon itself, but in a library that Rayon relies upon. Exploitation might involve crafting specific inputs or triggering certain application functionalities that indirectly utilize the vulnerable dependency through Rayon's code paths.
  • Impact: The impact depends on the nature of the dependency vulnerability. It could range from Denial of Service (DoS) to Remote Code Execution (RCE), potentially allowing attackers to fully compromise the application.
  • Mitigation:
    • Maintain an up-to-date list of Rayon's dependencies.
    • Regularly audit dependencies using tools like cargo audit to identify known vulnerabilities.
    • Update vulnerable dependencies promptly when patches are available.
    • Consider using dependency management tools that provide vulnerability scanning and alerts.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Misuse of Rayon API in Application Code [HIGH RISK PATH]

2. Exploit Misuse of Rayon API in Application Code [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is a broad category encompassing vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure usage of Rayon's API by application developers. It focuses on how developers might introduce weaknesses when integrating Rayon into their code.
  • Mechanism: Attackers exploit flaws in the application's logic that are introduced due to misunderstandings or mistakes in parallel programming with Rayon. This often involves concurrency issues, resource management problems, or logic errors specific to parallel execution.
  • Impact: The impact varies depending on the specific misuse. It can range from DoS (resource exhaustion, deadlocks) to data corruption, incorrect application behavior, and in some cases, security breaches like authorization bypasses.
  • Mitigation:
    • Provide thorough training to developers on secure concurrent programming practices and the correct usage of Rayon's API.
    • Establish coding guidelines and best practices for using Rayon securely.
    • Implement rigorous code reviews, especially for parallel code sections.
    • Utilize static analysis tools to detect potential concurrency issues and API misuse.
    • Conduct thorough testing, including concurrency stress testing and race condition detection (e.g., using ThreadSanitizer).

Attack Tree Path: 2.1. Introduce Data Races through Incorrect Parallelization [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.1. Introduce Data Races through Incorrect Parallelization [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Data races occur when multiple threads access shared mutable data concurrently, and at least one thread is modifying the data, without proper synchronization. This is a classic concurrency vulnerability.
  • Mechanism: Attackers exploit data races by crafting inputs or triggering application states that cause concurrent access to shared mutable data without adequate protection (e.g., mutexes, locks). This can lead to unpredictable and often undesirable outcomes.
  • Impact: Data races can lead to:
    • Data Corruption: Shared data can become inconsistent or invalid due to interleaved and unsynchronized modifications.
    • Undefined Behavior: Rust's memory model defines data races as undefined behavior, which can manifest in unpredictable ways, including crashes, incorrect results, or even exploitable security vulnerabilities.
    • Security Breaches: If security-sensitive data is involved in a data race, it could lead to authorization bypasses, information leaks, or other security flaws.
  • Mitigation:
    • Favor Immutability: Design application logic to minimize shared mutable state. Use immutable data structures whenever possible.
    • Proper Synchronization: When sharing mutable data is necessary, use appropriate synchronization primitives (Mutexes, RwLocks, Channels) to protect access and ensure data consistency.
    • Rust's Borrow Checker: Leverage Rust's borrow checker to prevent many data races at compile time.
    • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to detect potential data races in the code.
    • Dynamic Analysis (ThreadSanitizer): Employ dynamic analysis tools like ThreadSanitizer during testing to detect data races at runtime.
    • Code Reviews: Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on concurrency and data sharing patterns.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.1. Share Mutable Data Across Threads Without Proper Synchronization [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.1.1. Share Mutable Data Across Threads Without Proper Synchronization [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is a more specific instance of data races, focusing on the direct cause: sharing mutable data across threads without using synchronization mechanisms.
  • Mechanism: Developers might unintentionally or mistakenly share mutable data between Rayon tasks (e.g., through closures capturing mutable variables, or by passing mutable references to parallel operations) without using mutexes, locks, or atomic operations to control concurrent access.
  • Impact: Same as 2.1 - Data Corruption, Undefined Behavior, Security Breaches.
  • Mitigation: Same as 2.1 - Emphasize immutability, proper synchronization, Rust's borrow checker, static and dynamic analysis, and code reviews.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.1.1. Exploit Race Conditions in Shared Data Structures [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.1.1.1. Exploit Race Conditions in Shared Data Structures [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is the exploitation phase of data races in shared data structures. Attackers actively try to trigger the race condition to achieve a malicious outcome.
  • Mechanism: Attackers analyze the application's parallel code to identify shared mutable data structures that are accessed concurrently without proper synchronization. They then craft inputs or trigger application flows that maximize the likelihood of the race condition occurring at a critical point, leading to exploitable behavior.
  • Impact: Same as 2.1 - Data Corruption, Undefined Behavior, Security Breaches. The impact is now realized through active exploitation.
  • Mitigation: Primarily focus on preventing data races in the first place (mitigations for 2.1 and 2.1.1). Once data races are eliminated, this attack vector is neutralized.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.1.2. Cause Undefined Behavior due to Data Races [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.1.1.2. Cause Undefined Behavior due to Data Races [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This focuses on the consequence of data races in Rust: undefined behavior. Attackers aim to trigger undefined behavior through data races, hoping to exploit the unpredictable nature of UB for malicious purposes.
  • Mechanism: By inducing data races, attackers rely on the compiler and runtime's undefined behavior to create exploitable conditions. This might involve memory corruption, unexpected program flow, or other unpredictable outcomes that can be leveraged for attacks.
  • Impact: Undefined behavior can have a wide range of impacts, from crashes and DoS to memory corruption and potentially code execution, depending on how the UB manifests.
  • Mitigation: The primary mitigation is to prevent data races entirely (mitigations for 2.1 and 2.1.1). Rust's memory safety guarantees are designed to prevent UB, and eliminating data races is crucial for upholding these guarantees in concurrent code.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2. Resource Exhaustion through Parallelism Abuse [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2. Resource Exhaustion through Parallelism Abuse [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Attackers aim to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by exploiting the application's parallel processing capabilities to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, threads).
  • Mechanism: Attackers provide inputs or trigger application functionalities that lead to uncontrolled or inefficient parallel execution, overwhelming the system's resources and making the application unresponsive or unavailable.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - The application becomes slow, unresponsive, or crashes, preventing legitimate users from accessing its services.
  • Mitigation:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Validate and sanitize all inputs to prevent malicious inputs from triggering resource-intensive parallel operations.
    • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits for parallel processing, such as:
      • Thread Pool Size Limits: Limit the maximum number of threads that can be spawned for parallel tasks.
      • Task Queue Limits: Limit the number of pending parallel tasks.
      • Memory Limits: Set memory quotas for parallel operations to prevent out-of-memory errors.
      • Timeouts: Implement timeouts for parallel tasks to prevent them from running indefinitely and consuming resources.
    • Algorithm Efficiency: Choose efficient parallel algorithms and data structures to minimize resource consumption.
    • Benchmarking and Profiling: Benchmark and profile parallel code to identify potential performance bottlenecks and resource usage issues.
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting for operations that trigger parallel processing to prevent abuse.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.1. Trigger Excessive Parallel Task Creation [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2.1. Trigger Excessive Parallel Task Creation [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is a specific type of resource exhaustion attack, focusing on overwhelming the system by creating an excessive number of parallel tasks (threads).
  • Mechanism: Attackers provide inputs that cause the application to spawn a very large number of threads in parallel, often resembling a "fork bomb." This can quickly exhaust system resources (CPU, thread limits, process limits) and lead to DoS.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - System overload, application unresponsiveness, potential system crashes.
  • Mitigation: Same as 2.2, with a strong emphasis on input validation and limiting the number of parallel tasks created based on external input. Avoid unbounded parallelism.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.1.1. Provide Inputs Leading to Fork Bomb-like Behavior in Parallel Loops [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2.1.1. Provide Inputs Leading to Fork Bomb-like Behavior in Parallel Loops [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is the concrete action of providing malicious inputs to trigger excessive parallel task creation, leading to a fork bomb-like DoS.
  • Mechanism: Attackers craft specific inputs that, when processed by the application's parallel loops or operations, result in the creation of an exponentially increasing number of tasks. For example, an input might control the number of iterations in a parallel loop, and a large input value could lead to a task explosion.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - System overload, application unresponsiveness, potential system crashes.
  • Mitigation: Strict input validation is crucial. Limit the range of input values that control the degree of parallelism. Avoid directly using external input to determine the number of parallel tasks without careful validation and resource control.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2. Exploit Inefficient Parallel Algorithms [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2.2. Exploit Inefficient Parallel Algorithms [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Attackers exploit weaknesses in the application's parallel algorithms to degrade performance and cause DoS.
  • Mechanism: Some parallel algorithms might have performance bottlenecks or scale poorly for certain input types or sizes. Attackers can craft inputs that specifically trigger these bottlenecks, causing the parallel algorithm to perform much worse than expected, potentially even slower than a serial algorithm. This can lead to excessive resource consumption and DoS.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - Performance degradation, slow response times, resource exhaustion, application unresponsiveness.
  • Mitigation:
    • Algorithm Selection: Carefully choose parallel algorithms that are appropriate for the expected input types and sizes.
    • Benchmarking and Profiling: Thoroughly benchmark and profile parallel algorithms with various input sizes and distributions to identify potential performance bottlenecks and edge cases.
    • Input Validation: Validate input sizes and types to prevent processing of inputs that are known to cause performance degradation in parallel algorithms.
    • Fallback to Serial Processing: In cases where parallel algorithms perform poorly for certain inputs, consider falling back to serial processing or using alternative algorithms.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2.1. Craft Inputs that Degrade Parallel Performance to Serial or Worse [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2.2.1. Craft Inputs that Degrade Parallel Performance to Serial or Worse [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is the concrete action of crafting specific inputs to exploit inefficient parallel algorithms and degrade performance to DoS levels.
  • Mechanism: Attackers analyze the application's parallel algorithms to understand their performance characteristics and identify input patterns that cause significant performance degradation. They then craft inputs that match these patterns to trigger the performance bottleneck and cause DoS.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - Performance degradation, slow response times, resource exhaustion, application unresponsiveness.
  • Mitigation: Focus on algorithm selection, benchmarking, profiling, and input validation (mitigations for 2.2.2). Understanding the performance characteristics of parallel algorithms and preventing problematic inputs is key.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.3. Memory Exhaustion due to Parallel Data Processing [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2.3. Memory Exhaustion due to Parallel Data Processing [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Attackers aim to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by exploiting memory usage in parallel data processing to exhaust available memory.
  • Mechanism: Parallel processing can sometimes increase memory usage compared to serial processing, especially if data is duplicated across threads or intermediate results are stored in memory. Attackers can provide large inputs that cause the application to allocate excessive memory in parallel operations, leading to out-of-memory errors and DoS.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - Out-of-memory errors, application crashes, system instability.
  • Mitigation:
    • Memory Limits and Quotas: Implement memory limits and resource quotas for parallel processing to prevent excessive memory allocation.
    • Streaming or Iterative Processing: For large datasets, use streaming or iterative processing approaches instead of loading everything into memory at once. This can reduce memory footprint.
    • Memory-Efficient Data Structures and Algorithms: Choose memory-efficient data structures and algorithms for parallel processing.
    • Memory Monitoring: Monitor memory usage during parallel operations to detect and prevent memory exhaustion.
    • Input Size Limits: Limit the size of inputs that are processed in parallel to prevent excessive memory allocation.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.3.1. Provide Large Inputs that Cause Excessive Memory Allocation in Parallel Operations [HIGH RISK PATH]

2.2.3.1. Provide Large Inputs that Cause Excessive Memory Allocation in Parallel Operations [HIGH RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: This is the concrete action of providing large inputs to trigger memory exhaustion in parallel data processing, leading to DoS.
  • Mechanism: Attackers provide very large input datasets that, when processed in parallel by the application, cause it to allocate an excessive amount of memory. This can quickly exhaust available RAM and potentially swap space, leading to out-of-memory errors and application crashes.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) - Out-of-memory errors, application crashes, system instability.
  • Mitigation: Focus on memory limits, streaming/iterative processing, memory-efficient algorithms, memory monitoring, and input size limits (mitigations for 2.2.3). Preventing the processing of excessively large inputs is crucial.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3. Logic Errors in Parallel Code Leading to Security Flaws [CRITICAL NODE]

2.3. Logic Errors in Parallel Code Leading to Security Flaws [CRITICAL NODE]:

  • Attack Vector: Logic errors in parallel code, even without data races or resource exhaustion, can introduce security vulnerabilities. These errors arise from incorrect assumptions about concurrency, flawed synchronization logic, or subtle mistakes in parallel algorithm design that have security implications.
  • Mechanism: Attackers exploit logic errors in the application's parallel code to bypass security controls, gain unauthorized access, or manipulate sensitive data in unintended ways. These errors are often harder to detect than data races or resource exhaustion issues because they might not cause crashes or obvious errors but instead lead to subtle security flaws.
  • Impact: Security Breaches - Authorization bypasses, authentication bypasses, information leaks, data manipulation, privilege escalation, etc. The impact depends on the nature of the logic error and the security context it affects.
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure Design Principles: Apply secure design principles to parallel code, considering security implications at every stage of design and implementation.
    • Thorough Code Reviews: Conduct in-depth code reviews specifically focusing on security-critical logic in parallel code.
    • Security Testing: Perform security testing, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify logic errors that could lead to security flaws.
    • Formal Verification (where applicable): For critical security logic, consider using formal verification techniques to mathematically prove the correctness of parallel algorithms and synchronization logic.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege in parallel code, ensuring that parallel tasks only have the necessary permissions and access to resources.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3.1. Incorrect Synchronization Logic Leading to Authorization/Authentication Bypass [CRITICAL NODE]

2.3.1. Incorrect Synchronization Logic Leading to Authorization/Authentication Bypass [CRITICAL NODE]:

  • Attack Vector: This is a specific and critical type of logic error where flawed synchronization in parallel code leads to bypasses in authorization or authentication mechanisms.
  • Mechanism: If authorization or authentication decisions are made in parallel code with incorrect synchronization, race conditions or other concurrency issues can lead to inconsistent or incorrect security checks. Attackers can exploit these flaws to bypass access controls and gain unauthorized access to protected resources or functionalities.
  • Impact: Security Breaches - Authorization bypass, authentication bypass, unauthorized access to sensitive data or functionalities, privilege escalation. This is a high-impact vulnerability.
  • Mitigation:
    • Atomic Operations for Security Decisions: Ensure that security-critical decisions (authorization checks, authentication validation) are performed atomically and are not subject to race conditions. Use appropriate synchronization primitives (e.g., mutexes, atomic operations) to protect security logic.
    • Careful Review of Security Code: Extremely carefully review all parallel code sections that implement authorization or authentication logic. Pay close attention to synchronization and concurrency aspects.
    • Security-Focused Testing: Conduct specific security tests to verify the correctness and robustness of authorization and authentication mechanisms in parallel code. Try to identify race conditions or other concurrency issues that could lead to bypasses.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege rigorously in security-critical parallel code. Minimize the scope of access and permissions granted to parallel tasks.