Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (47 loc) · 6.05 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (47 loc) · 6.05 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for rayon-rs/rayon

Attack Surface: Data Races due to Unsound Send/Sync

  • Description: Data races occur when multiple threads access shared data concurrently, with at least one thread modifying the data, without proper synchronization. This leads to unpredictable behavior and data corruption.
  • How Rayon Contributes: Rayon directly enables parallel execution, making it far more likely to trigger latent data races that would be unlikely or impossible to hit in sequential code. Rayon's core functionality relies on the correctness of Send and Sync implementations for thread safety. If these are incorrect (unsound), Rayon will expose the underlying flaws.
  • Example:
    • A struct containing a Vec is incorrectly marked as Send and Sync. Multiple Rayon threads (initiated by par_iter_mut(), for example) attempt to push elements onto the Vec concurrently without locking, leading to memory corruption.
    • A custom data structure uses raw pointers internally and incorrectly claims to be Send and Sync without proper internal synchronization. Rayon parallelizes operations on this structure (e.g., via par_iter()), leading to use-after-free or double-free errors.
  • Impact: Data corruption, program crashes, undefined behavior, potentially leading to denial of service or, in rare but possible cases, exploitable vulnerabilities (if the corruption affects control flow or memory management).
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer:
      • Strictly adhere to Rust's ownership and borrowing rules. Avoid shared mutable state whenever possible.
      • Use established synchronization primitives (Mutex, RwLock, Atomic types) correctly when shared mutable state is unavoidable. Carefully consider locking granularity.
      • Thoroughly vet all dependencies for correct Send and Sync implementations. Use tools like cargo-geiger.
      • Prioritize well-tested and widely-used crates.
      • Employ extensive testing, including stress testing and fuzzing, to expose potential race conditions. Consider using tools like Loom.
      • Minimize unsafe code. If unsafe is necessary, audit it meticulously and ensure proper synchronization.

Attack Surface: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (Thread Pool Exhaustion)

  • Description: An attacker could attempt to exhaust system resources (CPU, memory) by triggering excessive thread creation or by causing Rayon to perform a very large number of small tasks.
  • How Rayon Contributes: Rayon directly manages a thread pool to execute parallel tasks. While it has default limits, a misconfigured custom thread pool (using ThreadPoolBuilder) or carefully crafted input could lead to resource exhaustion. Rayon's purpose is to manage threads, so this is a direct contribution.
  • Example:
    • An application uses a custom Rayon thread pool (via ThreadPoolBuilder::new().num_threads(...)) with a very high maximum thread limit. An attacker provides input that causes the application to spawn a massive number of tiny parallel tasks (e.g., many calls to par_iter() on small chunks), overwhelming the system.
    • An application processes user-uploaded data. An attacker uploads a specially crafted file designed to trigger an extremely large number of parallel operations within Rayon, even if each individual operation is small. The application uses Rayon's default global pool, but the sheer volume of tasks still causes significant resource strain.
  • Impact: Denial of service (DoS) due to resource exhaustion.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer:
      • Prefer Rayon's default global thread pool unless a custom pool is absolutely necessary.
      • If a custom thread pool is required, carefully configure its maximum size using ThreadPoolBuilder. Set a limit appropriate for the expected workload and system resources.
      • Implement input validation and sanitization to limit the size or complexity of data that can trigger parallel processing. This is crucial for preventing DoS attacks.
      • Monitor thread pool usage and system resource consumption. Implement alerting.
    • User/Administrator:
      • Run the application with appropriate resource limits (e.g., ulimit on Linux).

Attack Surface: Incorrect unsafe Code Interacting with Rayon

  • Description: unsafe code bypasses some of Rust's safety checks. If unsafe code interacts with data shared across Rayon threads without proper synchronization, it can introduce memory unsafety.
  • How Rayon Contributes: Rayon's parallelism directly increases the probability of triggering bugs in unsafe code that might not be apparent in sequential execution. The interaction between unsafe code and Rayon's parallel execution is the core issue.
  • Example:
    • An unsafe block accesses a raw pointer that is shared between multiple Rayon threads (initiated by any parallel operation) without using atomic operations or other synchronization.
    • An unsafe function incorrectly assumes exclusive access to a resource that is actually being shared by other Rayon threads due to a parallel iterator.
  • Impact: Memory corruption, crashes, undefined behavior, potential security vulnerabilities.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developer:
      • Minimize unsafe code. Explore safe alternatives.
      • If unsafe is unavoidable, audit it extremely carefully. Document all safety invariants.
      • Ensure proper synchronization within unsafe blocks when interacting with data shared across Rayon threads. Use atomic operations, mutexes, etc.
      • Test unsafe code thoroughly, especially in parallel contexts.