Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
162 lines (127 loc) · 12.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

162 lines (127 loc) · 12.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for rayon-rs/rayon

Mitigation Strategy: Employ Rayon-Compatible Synchronization Primitives (Mutex/RwLock)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Shared Mutable State within Rayon Iterators: Analyze the code specifically within Rayon's parallel iterators (par_iter, par_iter_mut, into_par_iter, and methods like for_each, map, filter, reduce, etc.). Identify any data structures accessed by these closures that are both shared between threads and modified by at least one thread.
    2. Choose the Right Lock (Rayon-Aware):
      • std::sync::Mutex: Use for exclusive access within Rayon parallel operations. Ensure the Mutex is outside the parallel closure, and the lock guard is acquired inside the closure, for the shortest possible duration.
      • std::sync::RwLock: Use for read-heavy scenarios within Rayon. Similar to Mutex, place the RwLock outside and acquire read or write guards inside the closure.
    3. Wrap Shared Data: Wrap the identified shared mutable data structure within the chosen lock before passing it to any Rayon parallel operation.
    4. Acquire and Release Locks within Closures: Crucially, acquire the lock inside the Rayon closure (e.g., the closure passed to for_each, map, etc.) and release it as soon as possible. The lock guard will automatically release when it goes out of scope. Use blocks ({}) to minimize the lock's scope. 
      use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use rayon::prelude::*;

let data = Arc::new(Mutex::new(vec![1, 2, 3]));

(0..10).into_par_iter().for_each(|_| {
    let mut locked_data = data.lock().unwrap(); // Acquire lock INSIDE the closure
    locked_data.push(4);
}); // Lock is released here
    5. Handle PoisonError: The .lock() method returns a Result. Handle the Err(PoisonError) case, which indicates that another thread panicked while holding the lock. Decide on an appropriate strategy (panic, log, or attempt recovery, but be very cautious with recovery).
    6. Avoid Deadlocks (Rayon Context): Be extremely mindful of deadlocks, especially when using nested parallelism or multiple locks. Always acquire locks in a consistent order across all Rayon parallel operations. Avoid holding locks across calls to other Rayon parallel methods if possible.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Races (High Severity): Prevents multiple threads within Rayon's parallel execution from simultaneously modifying the same data.
    • Inconsistent State (High Severity): Ensures data consistency within Rayon's parallel operations.

  • Impact:

    • Data Races: Risk reduced from High to Low (with correct implementation).
    • Inconsistent State: Risk reduced from High to Low (with correct implementation).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: src/rayon_data_processing.rs: The shared_results vector, used within a par_iter_mut call, is protected by a Mutex. The lock is acquired and released correctly within the closure.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: src/rayon_image_filter.rs: A shared image_buffer is accessed and modified within a par_iter().chunks_mut() call without any synchronization, leading to data races.
    • Example: src/rayon_task_queue.rs: Concurrent access to a shared task queue within a Rayon parallel loop is not synchronized.

Mitigation Strategy: Use Rayon-Compatible Atomic Types

  • Description:

    1. Identify Simple Shared Counters/Flags within Rayon: Within Rayon parallel iterators and operations, look for shared variables that are simple counters or flags and are modified by multiple threads.
    2. Choose the Appropriate Atomic Type: Select the correct atomic type from std::sync::atomic (e.g., AtomicUsize, AtomicIsize, AtomicBool).
    3. Replace and Use Atomically within Rayon Closures: Replace the original variable with its atomic counterpart before using it in Rayon. Use the atomic type's methods (load, store, fetch_add, etc.) inside the Rayon closures. 
      use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
use rayon::prelude::*;

let counter = AtomicUsize::new(0);

(0..100).into_par_iter().for_each(|_| {
    counter.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed); // Atomic operation INSIDE the closure
});

println!("Counter: {}", counter.load(Ordering::SeqCst));
    4. Choose Correct Memory Ordering (Rayon Context): Select the appropriate Ordering (e.g., Relaxed, Acquire, Release, AcqRel, SeqCst). Start with SeqCst for simplicity, and only use weaker orderings if you have a deep understanding of memory ordering and have profiled to confirm a performance benefit. Incorrect ordering can lead to subtle bugs even with atomic types within Rayon's parallel execution.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Races (High Severity): Prevents data races on simple shared counters and flags within Rayon's parallel execution.
    • Inconsistent State (Medium Severity): Ensures atomic and consistent updates to counters and flags within Rayon.

  • Impact:

    • Data Races: Risk reduced from High to Low (for simple counters/flags).
    • Inconsistent State: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: src/rayon_logging.rs: The log_entry_count is an AtomicUsize and is correctly used within a Rayon par_iter to count log entries generated in parallel.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: src/rayon_task_scheduler.rs: A tasks_completed counter, used within a Rayon parallel loop, is a regular usize, leading to incorrect counts due to data races.
    • Example: src/rayon_network/connection_manager.rs: A boolean flag is_active used to control worker threads within a Rayon parallel region is not atomic.

Mitigation Strategy: Bound Rayon's Parallelism

  • Description:

    1. Analyze Rayon Usage: Identify all uses of Rayon's parallel iterators and operations. Determine how the degree of parallelism scales with input size or other factors.
    2. Set a Global Thread Limit: Use rayon::ThreadPoolBuilder to configure the global Rayon thread pool. Set a num_threads value that is appropriate for the target environment and expected workload. This provides a hard limit on the maximum number of threads Rayon will use. 
      use rayon::ThreadPoolBuilder;

let pool = ThreadPoolBuilder::new().num_threads(16).build_global().unwrap(); // Set global pool
    3. Limit Input-Dependent Rayon Parallelism: If the amount of work done by Rayon depends on user input (e.g., the size of a collection passed to par_iter), implement strict limits on that input. This prevents attackers from triggering excessive parallelism. 
      fn process_data_with_rayon(data: &[i32]) -> Result<(), &'static str> {
    const MAX_DATA_SIZE: usize = 10_000;
    if data.len() > MAX_DATA_SIZE {
        return Err("Input too large for parallel processing");
    }
    // Use Rayon safely, knowing the input size is bounded
    let result = data.par_iter().map(|x| x * 2).collect::<Vec<_>>();
    Ok(result)
}
    4. Consider join and Scope for Fine-Grained Control: For more complex scenarios, use rayon::join or rayon::scope to create nested parallelism with more control over thread creation and lifetime. This can help prevent uncontrolled thread spawning.
    5. Avoid Unbounded par_iter on Potentially Large Inputs: Be extremely cautious when using par_iter (or similar methods) on collections where the size is not known in advance or is controlled by external input. Always have a mechanism to limit the size of these collections.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Prevents attackers from exploiting Rayon to cause resource exhaustion (CPU, memory) by triggering excessive parallel task creation.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevents Rayon from consuming excessive resources even under normal operation.

  • Impact:

    • DoS: Risk reduced from High to Medium (limits the impact).
    • Resource Exhaustion: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: src/main.rs: The global Rayon thread pool is configured with a maximum of 8 threads.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: src/rayon_api/process_request.rs: A user-provided list is directly passed to par_iter without any size limit, making it vulnerable to DoS.
    • Example: No limits are placed on the size of data structures processed by Rayon in several modules.

Mitigation Strategy: Handle Panics Gracefully within Rayon (with Caution)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Critical Rayon Tasks: Determine which Rayon parallel tasks are critical and where a panic could cause significant issues.
    2. Consider catch_unwind (with reservations) within Rayon closures: If you choose to use catch_unwind, wrap the code inside the Rayon closure (e.g., the closure passed to for_each, map, etc.) in a catch_unwind block. 
      use std::panic;
use rayon::prelude::*;

let data = vec![1, 2, 3];

data.par_iter().for_each(|&x| {
    let result = panic::catch_unwind(move || { // catch_unwind INSIDE the closure
        if x == 2 {
            panic!("Intentional panic");
        }
        println!("Processing: {}", x);
    });

    if let Err(err) = result {
        eprintln!("Rayon task panicked: {:?}", err);
        // Handle the panic (log, attempt recovery, etc.)
    }
});
    3. Log and Potentially Recover (Rayon Context): If a panic is caught within a Rayon task, log the error. Consider whether recovery is possible within the context of that specific parallel task. Be extremely cautious about attempting recovery, as the state may be inconsistent.
    4. Prioritize Panic Prevention in Rayon: The best approach is to prevent panics within Rayon parallel operations in the first place through robust code, error handling, and proper synchronization. catch_unwind should be a last resort for preventing complete application crashes, not a primary error handling mechanism.
    5. Understand Rayon's Panic Propagation: Rayon will propagate panics. If a task panics and is not caught with catch_unwind, the panic will propagate to the thread that initiated the parallel operation (e.g., the thread that called collect on a par_iter).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents a single panicking Rayon task from crashing the entire application.
    • Resource Leaks (Medium Severity): Can help prevent resource leaks within Rayon tasks.
    • Inconsistent State (Medium Severity): May help, but only with very careful recovery logic within the Rayon task.

  • Impact:

    • DoS: Risk reduced from Medium to Low (in some cases).
    • Resource Leaks: Risk reduced from Medium to Low.
    • Inconsistent State: Impact is variable; can increase risk if not handled correctly.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: src/rayon_network/request_handler.rs: catch_unwind is used within the Rayon closure that handles individual network requests, preventing a single request from crashing the entire server.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: src/rayon_data_processing.rs: Panics within the Rayon parallel data processing pipeline are not handled, potentially leading to crashes.
    • Example: Insufficient logging of panics caught within Rayon tasks.