Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
121 lines (96 loc) · 7.73 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

121 lines (96 loc) · 7.73 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for rg3dengine/rg3d

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous unsafe Code Management (rg3d Core)

  • Description:

    1. Identify: Locate all instances of unsafe code blocks within the rg3d codebase.
    2. Minimize: Refactor rg3d's internal code to reduce reliance on unsafe where safe alternatives exist. Prioritize safe Rust constructs.
    3. Isolate: Encapsulate unsafe operations within small, well-defined functions or modules within rg3d. Create safe, public interfaces.
    4. Document: Thoroughly document every unsafe block in the rg3d source. Explain why unsafe is necessary, assumptions, and risks.
    5. Review: Mandate code reviews by at least two experienced developers for any change to unsafe code within rg3d. Focus on memory safety.
    6. Static Analysis: Integrate static analysis tools (Clippy, rust-analyzer) into rg3d's CI/CD pipeline. Configure strict rules.
    7. Fuzzing: Develop fuzz tests specifically targeting the inputs and outputs of unsafe functions within rg3d. Use cargo fuzz.
    8. Runtime Checks (Debug): Add debug_assert! statements within unsafe blocks in rg3d to check for invalid conditions during development.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Memory Corruption (Critical): Reduces risk of memory corruption within rg3d itself.
    • Data Races (High): Minimizes data races in rg3d's multi-threaded code (if any).
    • Undefined Behavior (High): Prevents undefined behavior originating from rg3d's unsafe code.
    • Use-After-Free (Critical): Prevents usage of memory after it has been freed inside rg3d.

  • Impact:

    • Memory Corruption: Significantly reduces risk within the engine (e.g., 80-90%).
    • Data Races: Moderate to high reduction (e.g., 60-80%).
    • Undefined Behavior: High reduction (e.g., 70-90%).
    • Use-After-Free: Significantly reduces the risk (e.g., 80-90% reduction with comprehensive measures).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • rg3d uses unsafe in various places.
    • Some unsafe blocks are likely documented.
    • Clippy and rust-analyzer are likely used.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive documentation of all unsafe blocks.
    • Formalized, rigorous code review process for unsafe changes.
    • Extensive fuzzing of all unsafe interaction points.
    • Systematic use of debug_assert! in all unsafe blocks.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Dependency Management (rg3d's Cargo.toml)

  • Description:

    1. Audit: Run cargo audit regularly on rg3d's Cargo.toml (CI/CD pipeline).
    2. Outdated: Use cargo outdated to identify outdated dependencies of rg3d.
    3. Pinning: In rg3d's Cargo.toml, pin dependencies to specific versions using =.
    4. Review: Before adding any new dependency to rg3d, review its source code.
    5. Minimalism: Avoid adding unnecessary dependencies to rg3d.
    6. Update Carefully: When updating rg3d's dependencies, review changelogs and diffs.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Supply Chain Attacks (High): Reduces risk of rg3d incorporating malicious dependencies.
    • Known Vulnerabilities (High): Prevents rg3d from using dependencies with known vulnerabilities.
    • Dependency Confusion (Medium): Pinning versions helps prevent accidentally pulling in a malicious package with a similar name in rg3d.

  • Impact:

    • Supply Chain Attacks: Moderate reduction (e.g., 50-70%).
    • Known Vulnerabilities: High reduction (e.g., 80-90%).
    • Dependency Confusion: High reduction (e.g. 90% reduction).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • rg3d has a Cargo.toml.
    • Basic dependency management exists.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated cargo audit and cargo outdated in rg3d's CI/CD.
    • Formal dependency review process before adding to rg3d.
    • Strict version pinning might not be consistent.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Resource Validation (rg3d's Internal Loaders)

  • Description: This focuses on rg3d's own internal resource loading, not the game using rg3d.

    1. Identify Resources: List all resource types internally loaded by rg3d (e.g., for its editor, built-in shaders).
    2. Define Schemas: For each internal resource type, define a clear schema.
    3. Validate: Implement validation logic within rg3d before parsing/deserializing its own resources. Check file type, data types, size limits, data ranges, and structure.
    4. Safe Deserialization: Use serde (or similar) within rg3d for its internal deserialization.
    5. Error Handling: Handle parsing and validation errors gracefully within rg3d.
    6. Limit File Access: Restrict rg3d's ability to read files to only necessary directories.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Arbitrary Code Execution (Critical): Prevents exploits through malformed resources loaded by rg3d itself.
    • Denial of Service (High): Mitigates DoS against rg3d via large/malformed internal resources.
    • Information Disclosure (Medium): Reduces risk of info leaks from rg3d's error handling.

  • Impact:

    • Arbitrary Code Execution: High reduction (e.g., 80-95%) within rg3d.
    • Denial of Service: High reduction (e.g., 70-90%) for rg3d's internal operations.
    • Information Disclosure: Moderate reduction (e.g., 50-70%).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • rg3d likely has internal resource loading.
    • serde is probably used.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive, schema-based validation for all of rg3d's internal resources.
    • Strict size/range checks might be inconsistent.
    • Robust error handling and prevention of information leakage in rg3d's loaders.
    • Limiting file access might not be implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Physics Engine Hardening (Rapier within rg3d)

  • Description:

    1. Input Clamping: Within rg3d's integration with Rapier, clamp or limit the values of inputs to the physics engine (forces, velocities, etc.) to prevent extreme values.
    2. Sanity Checks: Add sanity checks within rg3d's physics simulation loop (where it interacts with Rapier) to detect and handle unrealistic situations.
    3. Fuzzing (Rapier Integration): If rg3d has custom code that heavily interacts with Rapier, fuzz those interaction points within rg3d's codebase.
    4. Rapier Updates: Keep the Rapier dependency within rg3d updated to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes and security improvements in Rapier itself.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (High): Reduces the risk of crashes or hangs caused by extreme physics inputs or unexpected simulation behavior within rg3d.
    • Logic Errors (Medium): Helps prevent unexpected game behavior due to physics glitches originating from rg3d's interaction with Rapier.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service: Moderate to high reduction (e.g., 60-80%) in rg3d.
    • Logic Errors: Moderate reduction (e.g., 40-60%).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • rg3d uses Rapier.
    • Some basic input handling likely exists.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive input clamping and sanity checks in all of rg3d's Rapier interaction code.
    • Dedicated fuzzing of rg3d's Rapier integration.
    • A process for ensuring timely updates of the Rapier dependency within rg3d.