Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
94 lines (85 loc) · 9.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

94 lines (85 loc) · 9.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ruffle-rs/ruffle

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Ruffle

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Ruffle
  • Description:
    1. Establish a monitoring process: Subscribe to Ruffle's official release channels (GitHub releases, mailing lists, Discord server) to receive notifications about new versions and security advisories.
    2. Create a testing environment: Set up a staging or testing environment that mirrors your production environment.
    3. Download the latest stable release: When a new stable version of Ruffle is released, download it from the official Ruffle GitHub repository or a trusted package manager.
    4. Integrate the new version into the testing environment: Replace the existing Ruffle version in your testing environment with the newly downloaded version.
    5. Thoroughly test: Conduct comprehensive testing in the staging environment. This includes:
      • Functionality testing: Verify that your application and Flash content still function as expected with the new Ruffle version.
      • Regression testing: Check for any unintended side effects or regressions introduced by the update.
      • Security testing: If security advisories accompanied the update, specifically test the addressed vulnerabilities.
    6. Deploy to production: If testing is successful and no issues are found, deploy the updated Ruffle version to your production environment.
    7. Document the update: Keep records of Ruffle versions and update dates for audit and tracking purposes.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in Ruffle (High Severity): Outdated versions of Ruffle may contain known security vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit to compromise the application or user systems.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in Ruffle (High Impact): Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation by patching known vulnerabilities.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • The development team is subscribed to Ruffle's GitHub releases and generally aware of new versions.
    • A basic testing environment exists, but dedicated security testing for Ruffle updates is not consistently performed.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formalized process for monitoring Ruffle releases and security advisories.
    • Dedicated security testing as part of the Ruffle update process in the staging environment.
    • Automated or scheduled checks for new Ruffle versions.

Mitigation Strategy: Use Stable Releases

  • Mitigation Strategy: Use Stable Releases
  • Description:
    1. Identify release channels: Understand Ruffle's release channels (stable, nightly, development).
    2. Prioritize stable releases: Always choose stable, tagged releases of Ruffle for production deployments. These are explicitly marked as stable and have undergone more testing.
    3. Avoid nightly/development builds in production: Refrain from using nightly or development builds in production environments as they are intended for testing and may contain unstable features, bugs, or undiscovered vulnerabilities.
    4. Use nightly/development builds for testing (optional): Nightly or development builds can be used in non-production testing environments to preview upcoming features or test against the latest changes, but not for production.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exposure to unstable features and bugs (Medium Severity): Nightly/development builds may introduce instability and bugs, some of which could have security implications or lead to unexpected behavior exploitable by attackers.
    • Undiscovered vulnerabilities in development code (Medium Severity): Development builds are less rigorously tested and may contain undiscovered vulnerabilities compared to stable releases.
  • Impact:
    • Exposure to unstable features and bugs (Medium Impact): Reduces the likelihood of encountering bugs and instability that could be exploited.
    • Undiscovered vulnerabilities in development code (Medium Impact): Reduces the risk of using code with potentially higher chances of undiscovered vulnerabilities.
  • Currently Implemented: Implemented.
    • The project currently uses stable releases of Ruffle downloaded from the official GitHub releases page.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • No specific missing implementation as the project already uses stable releases. Reinforcement of this practice in development guidelines and onboarding is recommended.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Ruffle Permissions and Capabilities

  • Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Ruffle Permissions and Capabilities
  • Description:
    1. Review Ruffle configuration options: Thoroughly examine Ruffle's configuration options and identify settings related to permissions and capabilities (e.g., access to browser APIs, file system access, network access).
    2. Disable unnecessary features: Disable any Ruffle features or APIs that are not strictly required for your application's Flash content to function correctly. This reduces the attack surface.
    3. Restrict permissions where possible: Where configuration options allow, restrict permissions to the minimum necessary level. For example, if Flash content doesn't need network access, disable or restrict network capabilities in Ruffle's configuration.
    4. Document configuration choices: Document the chosen Ruffle configuration settings and the rationale behind disabling or restricting specific features. This helps with understanding and maintaining the security posture.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of excessive Ruffle permissions (Medium Severity): If Ruffle has unnecessary permissions, vulnerabilities in Ruffle or Flash content could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to browser APIs, user data, or system resources.
    • Increased attack surface (Medium Severity): Enabling unnecessary features expands the attack surface of Ruffle, potentially increasing the number of exploitable vulnerabilities.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of excessive Ruffle permissions (Medium Impact): Reduces the potential impact of vulnerabilities by limiting the permissions available to Ruffle and Flash content.
    • Increased attack surface (Medium Impact): Reduces the attack surface by disabling unnecessary features, making it harder for attackers to find exploitable vulnerabilities.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Basic Ruffle configuration is used, but it's mostly default settings.
    • No systematic review or minimization of Ruffle permissions has been performed.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Security review of Ruffle configuration options.
    • Implementation of a minimal permission configuration for Ruffle.
    • Documentation of Ruffle configuration choices and security rationale.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Monitoring

  • Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits and Monitoring
  • Description:
    1. Identify resource usage metrics: Determine key resource usage metrics for Ruffle (CPU usage, memory consumption, network bandwidth).
    2. Establish baseline resource usage: Monitor Ruffle's resource usage under normal operating conditions to establish a baseline.
    3. Set resource limits: Implement resource limits for Ruffle's execution. This can be done at the browser level (if applicable), operating system level (e.g., using cgroups, resource quotas), or potentially through Ruffle's configuration if it offers such options.
    4. Implement resource usage monitoring: Set up monitoring systems to track Ruffle's resource usage in real-time.
    5. Define alerts and thresholds: Configure alerts to be triggered when Ruffle's resource usage exceeds predefined thresholds, indicating potential DoS attacks, resource exhaustion, or malicious activity.
    6. Incident response plan: Develop an incident response plan to handle situations where resource limits are exceeded or suspicious resource usage patterns are detected. This might involve terminating Ruffle processes, blocking content, or investigating further.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks (High Severity): Malicious Flash content or vulnerabilities in Ruffle could be exploited to cause excessive resource consumption, leading to DoS and application unavailability.
    • Resource exhaustion (Medium Severity): Unintentional resource leaks or inefficient Flash content could lead to resource exhaustion, impacting application performance and stability.
  • Impact:
    • Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks (High Impact): Reduces the impact of DoS attacks by limiting resource consumption and enabling early detection and response.
    • Resource exhaustion (Medium Impact): Mitigates resource exhaustion issues by setting limits and providing monitoring for proactive identification and resolution.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Basic server-level monitoring is in place, which indirectly monitors overall resource usage.
    • No specific monitoring or resource limits are configured directly for Ruffle's execution.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Implementation of resource limits specifically for Ruffle processes or instances.
    • Detailed monitoring of Ruffle's resource usage metrics (CPU, memory, network).
    • Alerting system for abnormal Ruffle resource consumption.
    • Incident response plan for resource-related security events involving Ruffle.