Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
275 lines (202 loc) · 18.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

275 lines (202 loc) · 18.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for rust-lang/mdbook

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Dependency Vetting

  1. Before adding a preprocessor/plugin:

    • Locate the source code repository (e.g., on GitHub, GitLab).
    • Examine the Cargo.toml file for dependencies. Recursively vet those dependencies as well.
    • Browse the source code, focusing on:
      • Files related to network communication (e.g., using reqwest, hyper).
      • Files that write to the filesystem (e.g., using std::fs).
      • Any use of unsafe blocks. Understand why unsafe is used and if it's justified.
      • Look for any obfuscated or minified code, which is unusual in Rust and a red flag.
    • Check the project's issue tracker and pull requests for any reported security issues.
    • Search online for any known vulnerabilities or discussions about the preprocessor/plugin.
    • Use cargo crev (if installed): cargo crev query <crate_name> to see community reviews.

  2. Ongoing Vetting:

    • Periodically repeat the above steps, especially before updating the preprocessor/plugin.
    • Subscribe to the project's release announcements or mailing list (if available) to be notified of updates and security advisories.

    Threats Mitigated: * Malicious Code Injection (Severity: Critical): Prevents preprocessors from injecting arbitrary code into the build process or the generated output. * Data Exfiltration (Severity: High): Reduces the risk of preprocessors sending sensitive data (from your source files or environment) to external servers. * Filesystem Manipulation (Severity: High): Limits the ability of preprocessors to write to unexpected locations on your filesystem.

    Impact: * Malicious Code Injection: Significantly reduces risk. Thorough vetting makes it very difficult for malicious code to be introduced unnoticed. * Data Exfiltration: Significantly reduces risk. Checking for network connections helps identify potential exfiltration attempts. * Filesystem Manipulation: Significantly reduces risk. Examining file I/O operations helps prevent unauthorized writes.

    Currently Implemented: * Not directly implemented within mdbook itself. This is a process that developers must follow. mdbook's documentation could be improved to emphasize this.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide a curated list of "trusted" preprocessors, although maintaining this would be a significant effort. * mdbook could integrate with tools like cargo-crev to display trust information directly within the build process. * mdbook's documentation should have a prominent section dedicated to preprocessor security.

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Hardening (Preprocessor-Specific)

  1. Identify Configuration Options:

    • Read the documentation for each preprocessor you use thoroughly.
    • Look for any configuration options related to:
      • Allowed URLs or domains (for preprocessors that fetch data).
      • File access restrictions.
      • Input validation or sanitization settings.
      • Any other security-relevant parameters.

  2. Apply Restrictive Settings:

    • Set the most restrictive values possible for all security-related options.
    • Use whitelists instead of blacklists whenever possible.
    • Disable any features you don't need.

  3. Document Configuration:

    • Keep a record of the configuration settings you've applied for each preprocessor. This helps with auditing and troubleshooting.

    Threats Mitigated: * Data Exfiltration (Severity: High): Limiting allowed URLs reduces the risk of data being sent to unauthorized destinations. * Filesystem Manipulation (Severity: High): File access restrictions limit where the preprocessor can write. * Specific Vulnerabilities (Severity: Variable): Addresses vulnerabilities that might be exploitable through specific configuration options.

    Impact: * Variable, depending on the specific preprocessor and its configuration options. Can significantly reduce risk for some threats.

    Currently Implemented: * Dependent on the individual preprocessor. mdbook itself doesn't provide a general mechanism for this.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide a standardized way for preprocessors to declare their security-relevant configuration options, making it easier for users to harden them. This could be a schema in book.toml or a separate configuration file read by mdbook.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Audits

  1. Schedule Audits:

    • Establish a regular schedule for auditing preprocessor and plugin code (e.g., monthly, quarterly).
    • Trigger additional audits whenever a new version of a preprocessor is released.

  2. Perform Audits:

    • Repeat the "Strict Dependency Vetting" steps, focusing on any changes since the last audit.
    • Use automated code analysis tools (e.g., cargo audit, clippy) to identify potential vulnerabilities.

  3. Subscribe to Advisories:

    • Subscribe to security advisories for the Rust ecosystem (e.g., the RustSec Advisory Database).
    • Subscribe to any security-related mailing lists or forums for the specific preprocessors you use.

    Threats Mitigated: * Zero-Day Exploits (Severity: Critical): Helps identify and mitigate newly discovered vulnerabilities before they are widely exploited. * Known Vulnerabilities (Severity: High): Ensures that you are aware of and address any known vulnerabilities in your preprocessors.

    Impact: * Significantly reduces the risk of using vulnerable preprocessors. The effectiveness depends on the frequency and thoroughness of the audits.

    Currently Implemented: * Not implemented within mdbook. This is a process that developers must follow.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide tooling to help automate vulnerability scanning of preprocessors. This could involve integrating with cargo audit or similar tools and providing reports as part of the build process.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Pinning (with caution)

  1. Identify Known-Good Version: After thoroughly vetting a preprocessor, note its specific version number.

  2. Pin in Cargo.toml: In your book.toml file, specify the exact version of the preprocessor:

    [preprocessor.my-preprocessor]
version = "=1.2.3"  # Use the exact version number

  3. Monitor for Updates: Actively monitor for security advisories and updates related to the pinned preprocessor.

  4. Update Pinned Version: When a security fix is released, update the pinned version in Cargo.toml and re-vet the new version.

  5. Update Cargo.lock: Run cargo update -p <crate_name> to update the lock file.

    Threats Mitigated: * Malicious Updates (Severity: High): Protects against a compromised preprocessor being automatically updated to a malicious version.

    Impact: * Reduces the risk of malicious updates, but increases the risk of using a vulnerable version if you don't actively monitor for updates.

    Currently Implemented: * Supported by Cargo (Rust's package manager), and configuration is done via book.toml which mdbook reads.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide guidance on when and how to use dependency pinning safely, specifically within its documentation.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation (within Markdown)

  1. Identify Input Points: Determine how your Markdown files interact with preprocessors. Are there any custom directives or syntax that pass data to the preprocessor?

  2. Treat as Untrusted: Consider all data passed from Markdown to a preprocessor as untrusted, even if it originates from your own files.

  3. Validate/Sanitize:

    • If the preprocessor expects a specific data type (e.g., a number, a URL), validate that the input conforms to that type before passing it to the preprocessor. This is ideally done within the preprocessor itself, but you may need to add your own validation logic in your Markdown if the preprocessor doesn't provide it.
    • Sanitize any input that might contain HTML or other potentially dangerous characters. Use a dedicated sanitization library if necessary.

  4. Avoid Sensitive Data: Never pass sensitive data (API keys, passwords) directly to preprocessors through Markdown.

    Threats Mitigated: * Preprocessor-Specific Vulnerabilities (Severity: Variable): Reduces the risk of exploiting vulnerabilities that rely on malicious input. * XSS (Severity: High): If the preprocessor generates HTML based on Markdown input, input validation helps prevent XSS attacks.

    Impact: * Variable, depending on the specific preprocessor and the type of input it handles. Can be crucial for preventing certain types of attacks.

    Currently Implemented: * Largely dependent on the individual preprocessor. mdbook itself doesn't provide a general input validation mechanism for preprocessors.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide a framework for preprocessors to define expected input types and validation rules. This could involve a schema that preprocessors adhere to, allowing mdbook to perform validation before calling the preprocessor.

Mitigation Strategy: Understand mdbook's Sanitization

  1. Review pulldown-cmark Documentation: Familiarize yourself with the pulldown-cmark Markdown parser (or whichever parser mdbook uses) and its HTML sanitization rules. Understand which HTML tags and attributes are allowed and which are stripped.

  2. Minimize Raw HTML: Avoid using raw HTML in your Markdown files whenever possible. Use Markdown syntax instead.

  3. Sanitize User Input (if applicable): If your mdbook site includes any user-generated content (e.g., comments), always sanitize this content before displaying it. Use a robust HTML sanitization library.

  4. Test with a Scanner: Use a web vulnerability scanner (e.g., OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite) to test your generated site for XSS vulnerabilities.

    Threats Mitigated: * Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: High): Reduces the risk of XSS attacks by relying on mdbook's built-in sanitization and minimizing the use of raw HTML.

    Impact: * Significant reduction in XSS risk, but not a complete guarantee. Defense-in-depth (CSP) is still essential.

    Currently Implemented: * mdbook uses pulldown-cmark (or a similar parser) for HTML sanitization.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook's documentation could provide more explicit guidance on its sanitization behavior and limitations. This should include a clear statement of which HTML tags and attributes are allowed, and any known bypasses.

Mitigation Strategy: mdbook-mermaid specific

  1. Update Regularly: Ensure you are using the latest version of mdbook-mermaid by checking for updates and updating your book.toml file accordingly.

  2. Avoid User Input: Do not allow users to provide input that is directly rendered into mermaid diagrams. If user input is unavoidable, sanitize it thoroughly before passing it to mdbook-mermaid.

  3. Review Generated SVG: Inspect the generated SVG output from mdbook-mermaid to ensure it does not contain any unexpected or malicious code.

    Threats Mitigated: * Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: High): Reduces the risk of XSS attacks specifically through mermaid diagrams.

    Impact: * High reduction in XSS risk related to mdbook-mermaid.

    Currently Implemented: * Partially implemented through the use of mdbook-mermaid, but relies on the user to keep it updated and avoid user input.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide specific warnings or guidance regarding the use of mdbook-mermaid and its potential security implications within its core documentation. It could also consider integrating more robust SVG sanitization.

Mitigation Strategy: Careful Content Management

  1. Review Content: Before publishing, carefully review all Markdown files to ensure they don't contain sensitive information.

  2. Use .gitignore: Create a .gitignore file in your mdbook source directory to exclude sensitive files (e.g., configuration files with API keys, drafts containing internal information) from your Git repository.

  3. Avoid Hardcoding Secrets: Never hardcode API keys, passwords, or other secrets directly in your Markdown files. Use environment variables or other secure methods to manage secrets.

    Threats Mitigated: * Information Disclosure (Severity: High): Prevents accidental exposure of sensitive data.

    Impact: * High reduction in information disclosure risk, provided the guidelines are followed consistently.

    Currently Implemented: * Not directly implemented within mdbook. This is a best practice for content management.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook's documentation could emphasize the importance of careful content management and provide examples of using .gitignore effectively, specifically tailored to mdbook projects.

Mitigation Strategy: Review Generated HTML

  1. Inspect Output: After running mdbook build, manually inspect the generated HTML files in the book directory.

  2. Check for Sensitive Data: Look for any unexpected data, especially in:

    • HTML comments.
    • <meta> tags.
    • Hidden elements (<div style="display: none;">).
    • JavaScript code.

  3. Use Automated Tools: Consider using automated tools to scan the generated HTML for potential information disclosure issues.

    Threats Mitigated: * Information Disclosure (Severity: High): Helps identify and remove any sensitive data that might have been inadvertently included in the generated output.

    Impact: * Moderate to high reduction in information disclosure risk, depending on the thoroughness of the review.

    Currently Implemented: * Not implemented within mdbook. This is a manual review process.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could potentially provide tools to help automate the detection of sensitive data in the generated output. This could be a plugin or a built-in feature that scans for common patterns (e.g., API keys, email addresses).

Mitigation Strategy: Path Traversal

  1. Identify Custom Links/Includes: Examine your Markdown files for any custom links or include directives that reference files outside the main content directory.

  2. Validate Input: If any links or includes are based on user-provided input, validate that input thoroughly before using it to construct file paths.

    • Check for suspicious characters like .., /, and \.
    • Ensure the input doesn't allow escaping the intended directory.

  3. Sanitize Input: If validation is not sufficient, sanitize the input by removing or replacing any potentially dangerous characters.

  4. Use Safe Functions: When constructing file paths, use functions that are designed to prevent path traversal vulnerabilities (e.g., functions that normalize paths and prevent escaping the base directory).

    Threats Mitigated: * Path Traversal (Severity: High): Prevents attackers from accessing files outside the intended directory. * Information Disclosure (Severity: High): Prevents attackers from reading sensitive files on the server.

    Impact: * High reduction in path traversal and information disclosure risk if implemented correctly.

    Currently Implemented: * Not directly implemented within mdbook. Relies on careful coding practices when using custom links and includes.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could provide helper functions or libraries for safely handling file paths and includes. This could be part of the preprocessor API or a separate module. * mdbook's documentation could include a section on preventing path traversal vulnerabilities, with specific examples and best practices.

Mitigation Strategy: Bind to Localhost

  1. Use --ip Option: When starting the development server, always use the --ip option to bind it to localhost:

    mdbook serve --ip 127.0.0.1

  2. Avoid Default Binding: Do not rely on the default binding behavior, as it might expose the server to other machines on your network.

    Threats Mitigated: * Unauthorized Access (Severity: High): Prevents unauthorized users on your network from accessing the development server.

    Impact: * High reduction in unauthorized access risk.

    Currently Implemented: * Supported by mdbook serve through the --ip option.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could make 127.0.0.1 the default binding address, requiring users to explicitly opt-in to wider exposure (e.g., with a --public flag). The documentation should strongly emphasize the security implications of binding to other interfaces.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Running as Root

  1. Use a Regular User Account: Always run mdbook serve (and all other mdbook commands) from a regular user account, not the root account.

  2. Avoid sudo: Do not use sudo to run mdbook commands unless absolutely necessary (and then only for specific commands that require elevated privileges, not the entire build process).

    Threats Mitigated: * System Compromise (Severity: Critical): Limits the potential damage if a vulnerability in mdbook or a preprocessor is exploited.

    Impact: * Very high reduction in the severity of potential exploits.

    Currently Implemented: * Not enforced by mdbook. This is a general security best practice.

    Missing Implementation: * mdbook could issue a warning if it detects that it's being run as root. This would be a simple check within the mdbook code.