Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
86 lines (72 loc) · 7.48 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

86 lines (72 loc) · 7.48 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for seanmonstar/warp

Objective: Compromise a web application built using the warp Rust framework by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses inherent in Warp or its usage.

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise Warp-Based Application [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[AND] Exploit Warp Framework Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   └───[OR] Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
│       ├─── Exploit Vulnerabilities in `tokio` (Runtime) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       ├─── Exploit Vulnerabilities in `hyper` (HTTP Library) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       └─── Exploit Vulnerabilities in other Warp Dependencies [HIGH RISK PATH]
├───[AND] Exploit Warp Application Misconfiguration [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] Insecure TLS Configuration [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── Weak Cipher Suites [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   └─── Outdated TLS Protocol Versions [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   └───[OR] Exposed Debug/Admin Endpoints [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]
└───[AND] Request Smuggling/Splitting [POTENTIAL HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Root: Compromise Warp-Based Application [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Vectors: This is the ultimate goal, achieved through any of the sub-paths in the tree. Success here means the attacker has achieved their objective of unauthorized access, control, or disruption.

  • Mitigation: Implement comprehensive security measures across all areas identified in the attack tree.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Warp Framework Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Vectors: Exploiting vulnerabilities within the Warp framework itself or its core dependencies. This is a broad category encompassing: * Dependency Vulnerabilities: Exploiting known or zero-day vulnerabilities in Warp's dependencies. * Request Handling Vulnerabilities: Exploiting bugs in how Warp processes HTTP requests (though less likely to be framework-specific and more likely in application logic or underlying crates).

  • Mitigation:
    • Dependency Management: Rigorous dependency management, including regular updates and vulnerability scanning.
    • Framework Updates: Keep Warp updated to the latest stable version.
    • Security Audits: Conduct security audits of the application and its dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vectors: Exploiting vulnerabilities in crates that Warp depends on, directly or indirectly. * Exploit Vulnerabilities in tokio (Runtime) [HIGH RISK PATH]: Targeting vulnerabilities in the tokio asynchronous runtime. * Action: Trigger conditions that exploit known or zero-day vulnerabilities in tokio. * Impact: System compromise, denial of service, or other severe impacts depending on the vulnerability. * Exploit Vulnerabilities in hyper (HTTP Library) [HIGH RISK PATH]: Targeting vulnerabilities in the hyper HTTP library. * Action: Trigger conditions that exploit known or zero-day vulnerabilities in hyper, such as HTTP/2 related issues. * Impact: Request smuggling, denial of service, potential remote code execution depending on the vulnerability. * Exploit Vulnerabilities in other Warp Dependencies [HIGH RISK PATH]: Targeting vulnerabilities in any other crates in Warp's dependency tree. * Action: Identify and exploit vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies. * Impact: Varies widely depending on the vulnerable dependency, potentially leading to data breaches, denial of service, or other impacts.

  • Mitigation:
    • cargo audit: Regularly use cargo audit to identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies.
    • Dependency Updates: Keep all dependencies updated to the latest versions.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate dependency vulnerability scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Dependency Review: Periodically review the application's dependency tree and assess the risk associated with each dependency.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Warp Application Misconfiguration [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vectors: Exploiting security weaknesses introduced by misconfiguring the Warp application or its deployment environment. * Insecure TLS Configuration [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]: Misconfiguring TLS settings, leading to weakened encryption. * Weak Cipher Suites [HIGH RISK PATH]: Configuring Warp to use weak or outdated cipher suites. * Action: Perform man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt traffic using weak ciphers. * Impact: Loss of confidentiality, data interception. * Outdated TLS Protocol Versions [HIGH RISK PATH]: Configuring Warp to support outdated TLS versions (e.g., TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1). * Action: Downgrade attacks to force the use of vulnerable TLS versions. * Impact: Loss of confidentiality, exploitation of known TLS vulnerabilities. * Mitigation: * Strong Cipher Suites: Configure Warp (or the reverse proxy/TLS termination point) to use only strong and modern cipher suites. * Modern TLS Versions: Enforce TLS 1.2 or higher and disable outdated versions. * TLS Configuration Scanners: Use tools to regularly scan and verify TLS configurations. * Exposed Debug/Admin Endpoints [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH RISK PATH]: Unintentionally exposing debug or administrative endpoints in production. * Action: Access exposed debug/admin endpoints to gain unauthorized control or information. * Impact: Complete application compromise, data breaches, system control. * Mitigation: * Environment Separation: Ensure debug/admin endpoints are strictly limited to development and staging environments. * Routing Review: Carefully review routing configurations for production deployments to prevent accidental exposure. * Authentication and Authorization: Implement strong authentication and authorization for all administrative functions, even in non-production environments.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Request Smuggling/Splitting [POTENTIAL HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Vectors: Exploiting inconsistencies in how Warp and upstream servers (like proxies or load balancers) parse HTTP requests. * Action: Craft requests that are interpreted differently by Warp and upstream components. * Impact: Bypassing security controls, gaining unauthorized access, data corruption.

  • Mitigation:
    • Consistent HTTP Parsing: Ensure consistent HTTP parsing configurations across all components in the application architecture.
    • Proxy Configuration Review: Thoroughly test and review proxy configurations to prevent request smuggling vulnerabilities.
    • HTTP/2 Focus: Using HTTP/2 can reduce the likelihood of some request smuggling attacks compared to HTTP/1.1.