Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
100 lines (74 loc) · 9.14 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

100 lines (74 loc) · 9.14 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for sharkdp/bat

Objective: To compromise application that uses bat by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within the project itself, specifically focusing on high-risk attack vectors.

Attack Tree Visualization

[1.0] Exploit Input Manipulation to bat Command [High-Risk Path] [1.1] Path Traversal Vulnerability [High-Risk Path] [1.1.1] Inject Path Traversal Sequences (e.g., ../../) [High-Risk Path] [1.1.1.1] Read Sensitive Files (e.g., /etc/passwd, application config) [High-Risk Path] [1.2] Command Injection via Filename [High-Risk Path] [1.2.1] Inject Shell Metacharacters in Filename [High-Risk Path] [1.2.1.1] Execute Arbitrary Commands (e.g., ; whoami, $(command)) [High-Risk Path] [2.0] Exploit bat Output Handling by Application [Elevated Risk Path] [2.1] Output Injection leading to XSS [Elevated Risk Path] (Less likely for direct application compromise, but possible) [2.1.2] Application Renders bat Output Directly in Web Page [Elevated Risk Path] [2.1.2.1] No Output Sanitization/Encoding by Application [Elevated Risk Path]

Attack Tree Path: 1.0 Exploit Input Manipulation to bat Command (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: This is the overarching category of attacks where an attacker manipulates the input provided to the bat command executed by the web application. This input is typically the filename to be processed by bat.
  • Risk: High. Improper handling of user-controlled input is a common and critical vulnerability in web applications.
  • Impact: Can lead to severe consequences like unauthorized file access, command execution, and full application compromise.
  • Mitigation Focus: Implement robust input validation, sanitization, and safe command execution practices.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 Path Traversal Vulnerability (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting the application's handling of filenames to access files outside the intended directory. Attackers inject path traversal sequences like ../ or ..\\ into the filename.
  • Risk: High. Path traversal is a well-known and easily exploitable vulnerability if input is not properly validated.
  • Impact: Reading sensitive files on the server, including configuration files, source code, databases, and user data.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Strictly validate filename input, rejecting path traversal sequences.
    • Canonicalize paths to resolve symbolic links and relative paths.
    • Consider using chroot/jail environments to restrict bat's file system access.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1 Inject Path Traversal Sequences (e.g., ../../) (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The specific technique of inserting ../ or ..\\ sequences into the filename provided to the application, aiming to navigate up directory levels.
  • Risk: High. Direct and simple path traversal attack.
  • Impact: Enables access to files outside the intended directory.
  • Mitigation Focus: Specifically block or remove ../ and ..\\ sequences from filename inputs.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1.1 Read Sensitive Files (e.g., /etc/passwd, application config) (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The successful outcome of a path traversal attack, where the attacker gains access to sensitive files on the server. Examples include system configuration files (/etc/passwd), application configuration files, and other confidential data.
  • Risk: High. Direct exposure of sensitive information.
  • Impact: Information disclosure, potentially leading to further attacks, privilege escalation, or data breaches.
  • Mitigation Focus: Prevent path traversal vulnerabilities entirely to avoid reaching this stage. Implement strong access controls on sensitive files.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2 Command Injection via Filename (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: Injecting shell metacharacters (e.g., ;, |, $()) into the filename. If the application executes bat using a shell and doesn't properly sanitize the filename, these metacharacters can be interpreted as shell commands.
  • Risk: High. Command injection is a critical vulnerability that allows arbitrary code execution.
  • Impact: Full compromise of the server, including data theft, malware installation, and denial of service.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Sanitize filename input to remove or escape shell metacharacters.
    • Use safe command execution methods that avoid shell interpretation (e.g., parameterized commands, subprocess.run with shell=False in Python).

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1 Inject Shell Metacharacters in Filename (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The specific technique of inserting characters like ;, |, $, (, ) , ` into the filename input to be processed by bat.
  • Risk: High. Direct command injection attempt.
  • Impact: Potential for arbitrary command execution.
  • Mitigation Focus: Specifically sanitize or escape shell metacharacters in filename inputs.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1.1 Execute Arbitrary Commands (e.g., ; whoami, $(command)) (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The successful outcome of command injection, where the attacker is able to execute arbitrary commands on the server with the privileges of the web application user.
  • Risk: Critical. Full system compromise.
  • Impact: Complete control over the server, data breaches, system downtime, and reputational damage.
  • Mitigation Focus: Prevent command injection vulnerabilities entirely. Implement the principle of least privilege for the web application user.

Attack Tree Path: 2.0 Exploit bat Output Handling by Application (Critical Node & Elevated Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting how the web application processes and displays the output generated by bat. If the application directly renders bat's output without sanitization, it can be vulnerable to output injection attacks, primarily XSS.
  • Risk: Elevated. While less likely to directly compromise the server, XSS is a significant client-side vulnerability.
  • Impact: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks, leading to user session hijacking, data theft from users, and website defacement.
  • Mitigation Focus: Always sanitize or encode bat's output before displaying it in web pages. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) as a defense-in-depth measure.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1 Output Injection leading to XSS (Critical Node & Elevated Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The general category of attacks where malicious content is injected into the output of bat and then rendered by the application in a web page without proper sanitization, leading to XSS.
  • Risk: Elevated. XSS vulnerability.
  • Impact: Client-side attacks, user data compromise.
  • Mitigation Focus: Sanitize bat output.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.2 Application Renders bat Output Directly in Web Page (Elevated Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The application directly embeds the raw output from bat into the HTML of a web page without any sanitization or encoding.
  • Risk: Elevated. Direct rendering of unsanitized output is a common cause of XSS.
  • Impact: XSS vulnerability.
  • Mitigation Focus: Avoid directly rendering unsanitized output. Implement output sanitization/encoding.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.2.1 No Output Sanitization/Encoding by Application (Elevated Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: The specific vulnerability where the application fails to sanitize or encode the output from bat before displaying it in a web page.
  • Risk: Elevated. Direct and easily exploitable XSS vulnerability.
  • Impact: XSS vulnerability.
  • Mitigation Focus: Mandatory output sanitization/encoding before rendering bat output. Use appropriate encoding functions like HTML entity encoding.