Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
199 lines (142 loc) · 10.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

199 lines (142 loc) · 10.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for sharkdp/bat

Mitigation Strategy: Limit Input File Size

  • Mitigation Strategy: Limit Input File Size

    • Description:

      1. Define a Maximum File Size: Determine a reasonable maximum file size limit (e.g., 10MB, 50MB, 100MB). Make this configurable via a command-line option and/or a configuration file setting.
      2. Implement a Check: Before reading the entire file, use std::fs::metadata (or equivalent) in Rust to get the file size.
      3. Enforce the Limit: If file_size > max_size, immediately return an error and do not proceed with processing. Print a clear error message to the user.
      4. (Optional, Advanced) Streaming: Consider a streaming approach (reading the file in chunks) to avoid loading the entire file into memory, even if it's below the limit. This adds complexity but improves resilience.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) - High Severity: Prevents bat from crashing or becoming unresponsive due to excessively large input files.
      • Resource Exhaustion - High Severity: Prevents exhaustion of memory and other system resources.

    • Impact:

      • DoS: Significantly reduces the risk.
      • Resource Exhaustion: Greatly reduces the risk.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially. bat has -l/--length (output truncation), but this is after the file is read. --map-syntax exists but is for a different purpose.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • A hard limit on input file size before any processing is missing. The -l option is insufficient. This needs to be implemented in the file loading logic.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize Input Filenames and Paths

  • Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize Input Filenames and Paths

    • Description:

      1. Identify Input Points: Locate all code points where bat receives filenames or paths (command-line arguments, config files, etc.).
      2. Sanitization Function: Create a Rust function to sanitize filenames/paths:
        • Remove/replace: ../, /, \, control characters, shell metacharacters.
        • Whitelist: Allow only alphanumeric, _, -, ., and potentially a few others.
        • Normalize: Resolve relative paths to absolute paths.
      3. Apply Consistently: Call this function before any system calls (e.g., std::fs::File::open) or library calls that use the filename/path.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Path Traversal - Medium to High Severity: Prevents accessing files outside the intended directory.
      • Command Injection (Less Likely) - High Severity: Provides a defense, though bat shouldn't execute commands directly.

    • Impact:

      • Path Traversal: Significantly reduces the risk.
      • Command Injection: Adds a layer of protection.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely partially, due to Rust's standard library protections. But explicit sanitization is crucial.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • A dedicated, consistently applied sanitization function is likely missing. Implement in argument parsing and file handling.

Mitigation Strategy: Careful Handling of Symlinks

  • Mitigation Strategy: Careful Handling of Symlinks

    • Description:

      1. Command-Line Option: Add --no-follow-symlinks to disable following symbolic links.
      2. Secure Default: The default should be not to follow symlinks (or prompt the user).
      3. Implementation:
        • Check if a file is a symlink.
        • If symlinks are disabled (via option or default), do not follow. Show an error or info about the link itself.
        • If enabled, consider a "chroot-like" restriction (advanced): Ensure the symlink's target stays within an allowed directory.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Information Disclosure - Medium to High Severity: Prevents revealing sensitive file contents.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium Severity: Prevents linking to huge files.
      • Symlink Races (Less Likely) - Medium Severity: Reduces the risk.

    • Impact:

      • Information Disclosure: Significantly reduces the risk.
      • DoS: Reduces the risk.
      • Symlink Races: Provides some protection.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • bat does follow symlinks by default, with no option to disable.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • --no-follow-symlinks is completely missing.
      • Logic to handle symlinks based on user preference/default is missing.
      • The "chroot-like" restriction is missing. Implement in file handling.

Mitigation Strategy: Syntax Highlighting Specific Mitigations (Fuzz Testing)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Syntax Highlighting Specific Mitigations (Fuzz Testing)

    • Description:

      1. Fuzzing Framework: Choose a Rust fuzzing framework (e.g., cargo fuzz, libFuzzer).
      2. Fuzz Targets: Write targets that feed arbitrary input to bat's syntect integration.
      3. CI/CD Integration: Run fuzzing regularly (e.g., on every commit) as part of the CI/CD pipeline.
      4. Monitor & Triage: Monitor for crashes and fix any discovered vulnerabilities.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Arbitrary Code Execution (Low Likelihood, High Severity):
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium to High Severity:
      • Information Disclosure (Low Likelihood) - Medium Severity:

    • Impact:

      • Arbitrary Code Execution: Significantly reduces the risk.
      • DoS: Significantly reduces the risk.
      • Information Disclosure: Provides better protection.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely not implemented.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Fuzz testing is likely completely missing. Requires setup, target writing, and CI/CD integration.

Mitigation Strategy: Syntax Highlighting Specific Mitigations (Disable Syntax Highlighting)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Syntax Highlighting Specific Mitigations (Disable Syntax Highlighting)

    • Description:

      1. Command-Line Option: Add --no-syntax (or similar) to completely disable syntax highlighting.
      2. Implementation: Bypass the syntect engine entirely when this option is used. Output plain text. This should be distinct from --plain which might still do some processing.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Arbitrary Code Execution (Low Likelihood, High Severity):
      • Denial of Service (DoS) - Medium to High Severity:
      • Information Disclosure (Low Likelihood) - Medium Severity:

    • Impact:

      • Arbitrary Code Execution: Eliminates the risk when used.
      • DoS: Eliminates the risk from the highlighting engine when used.
      • Information Disclosure: Eliminates the risk from the highlighting engine when used.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • bat has --plain (-p), but it's not a complete bypass of all highlighting.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • A dedicated option to specifically disable only syntax highlighting (leaving other features) might be beneficial. Clarify the difference in documentation.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Defaults

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Defaults

    • Description:

      1. Identify Options: List all configuration options with security implications (symlink following, max file size, etc.).
      2. Secure Defaults: Choose defaults that prioritize security:
        • Disable symlink following.
        • Set a reasonable max file size.
      3. Document: Clearly document the defaults in bat's documentation.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Various Threats - Variable Severity: Protects users who don't explicitly configure bat.

    • Impact:

      • Various Threats: Significantly reduces risk for users relying on defaults.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Partially. A comprehensive review and documentation are needed.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Systematic review of all options for secure defaults and clear documentation.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Configuration Values

  • Mitigation Strategy: Validate Configuration Values

    • Description:

      1. Identify Sources: Determine where bat reads configuration (command-line, config files, environment).
      2. Validation Logic: For each option:
        • Check type and range (e.g., max file size must be a positive integer).
        • Apply sanitization (as for filenames) if the option is a path.
      3. Reject Invalid: Reject invalid values with an error; use defaults or exit.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Various Threats - Variable Severity: Prevents using malicious configuration to exploit vulnerabilities.

    • Impact:

      • Various Threats: Reduces risk of attacks via configuration.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely partially for some command-line arguments, but not comprehensively.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Consistent validation for all options, from all sources.

Mitigation Strategy: Terminal Escape Sequence Sanitization

  • Mitigation Strategy: Terminal Escape Sequence Sanitization

    • Description:

      1. Review Output: Examine code generating terminal output (colors, formatting).
      2. Verify Library: Ensure libraries like termcolor or ansi_term are used correctly and sanitize escape sequences.
      3. Additional Sanitization (If Needed): If bat constructs escape sequences directly from user input, add sanitization to remove/escape dangerous characters.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Terminal Escape Sequence Injection - Low Likelihood, Medium Severity:

    • Impact:

      • Terminal Escape Sequence Injection: Reduces the (low) risk.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely partially, through library usage. A review is recommended.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Specific review of output handling to confirm correct sanitization.