Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (23 loc) · 5.22 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

28 lines (23 loc) · 5.22 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for simd-lite/simd-json

Attack Surface: SIMD Instruction Implementation Bugs (Data Corruption & Memory Safety) - Critical

  • Description: Bugs in the SIMD instruction-based implementation within simd-json could lead to incorrect parsing, data corruption, or memory safety issues like buffer overflows or out-of-bounds reads.
  • How simd-json contributes: simd-json's core performance relies on complex SIMD instructions. Errors in these low-level implementations are possible and can have severe security implications. The complexity of SIMD code increases the chance of subtle bugs.
  • Example: A bug in simd-json's SIMD code for parsing strings might cause a buffer overflow when handling very long strings or strings with specific character encodings. This could potentially be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution. Another example could be a bug in number parsing leading to out-of-bounds memory access when processing large numeric values.
  • Impact: Data corruption, incorrect application logic, Denial of Service (crashes), and potentially exploitable vulnerabilities (buffer overflows, out-of-bounds reads, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution - RCE).
  • Risk Severity: Critical (due to potential for memory safety issues and exploitable vulnerabilities like RCE).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates to simd-json: Immediately apply updates to simd-json as they are released. Security patches often address discovered bugs in the SIMD implementation.
    • Security Monitoring and Advisories: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases related to simd-json. Subscribe to project mailing lists or security feeds to stay informed about potential issues.
    • Platform-Specific Testing and Reporting: If you encounter unusual behavior or crashes that seem related to simd-json, especially on specific platforms, report these issues to the simd-json project maintainers. Detailed platform information is crucial for debugging SIMD-related problems.
    • Consider Alternative Parsers (If Critical Security is Paramount and Doubt Exists): In extremely security-sensitive applications, if there are unresolved concerns about simd-json's SIMD implementation, consider using a more mature and heavily audited JSON parser (though potentially at the cost of performance) as a fallback or alternative, especially for processing untrusted input. This is a drastic measure and should be weighed against the performance benefits of simd-json.

Attack Surface: Malformed JSON Parsing Vulnerabilities (Specific Edge Cases Leading to Crashes/Exploits) - High

  • Description: While generally robust, simd-json might have specific edge cases in its malformed JSON handling that could lead to crashes or exploitable conditions, especially when encountering highly unusual or deliberately crafted invalid JSON.
  • How simd-json contributes: The focus on performance in simd-json might lead to less exhaustive error handling in certain edge cases of malformed JSON compared to parsers prioritizing strict validation above all else. Complex parsing logic can sometimes have unexpected behavior with unusual inputs.
  • Example: A specifically crafted malformed JSON payload, designed to exploit a weakness in simd-json's parsing logic (e.g., related to escape sequences, unicode handling, or specific syntax errors), could trigger a crash or unexpected memory access within simd-json. This might be discovered through targeted fuzzing.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) through application crashes, potential for exploitable vulnerabilities if malformed input triggers memory corruption or other security-sensitive errors.
  • Risk Severity: High (potential for DoS and exploitable vulnerabilities, although likely requiring very specific and crafted malformed input).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust Error Handling and Logging: Implement thorough error handling around simd-json parsing. Log detailed error information (without exposing sensitive data) to help diagnose potential issues and identify attack attempts.
    • Fuzzing with Diverse Malformed JSON: Employ comprehensive fuzzing techniques using a wide range of malformed JSON inputs, including edge cases, boundary conditions, and inputs specifically designed to test parser robustness. Use fuzzing tools that are aware of JSON syntax and can generate intelligent malformed inputs.
    • Input Sanitization (Limited Value for Malformed JSON Parsing Issues): While general input sanitization is good practice, it's less effective against malformed JSON parsing vulnerabilities in simd-json itself. The focus should be on robust error handling and fuzzing to uncover parser-specific weaknesses.
    • Rate Limiting and Request Filtering: Implement rate limiting and request filtering to mitigate DoS attempts that rely on sending a large volume of potentially malicious JSON payloads to trigger parsing vulnerabilities.