Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (75 loc) · 8.86 KB

File metadata and controls

87 lines (75 loc) · 8.86 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for solana-labs/solana

Objective: To successfully compromise an application that leverages the Solana blockchain platform by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses inherent in Solana itself or its integration within the application, focusing on the most critical and likely attack vectors.

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise Application via Solana Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Paths)
    ├── OR: **[CRITICAL NODE]** Exploit Solana Program (Smart Contract) Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   └── OR: **[CRITICAL NODE]** Vulnerability in Custom Solana Program deployed by Application [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │       ├── OR: Program Logic Errors [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │       │   └── Action: Craft transactions to trigger logic errors and exploit them.
    │       ├── OR: Access Control Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │       │   └── Action: Bypass access controls to perform unauthorized actions.
    ├── OR: **[CRITICAL NODE]** Exploit Solana Client Library (SDK) Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── AND: Application Uses Vulnerable SDK Functionality
    │   │   ├── OR: Vulnerability in Transaction Construction/Signing [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   │   └── Action: Manipulate transaction construction or signing process to inject malicious transactions.
    │   │   ├── OR: Vulnerability in Data Parsing/Serialization [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   │   └── Action: Send crafted data to exploit parsing/serialization vulnerabilities in the SDK.
    ├── OR: **[CRITICAL NODE]** Exploit Application's Misuse of Solana Features [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├── AND: **[CRITICAL NODE]** Insecure Key Management by Application [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   └── OR: Private Key Exposure [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │       └── Action: Steal private keys to control application's or user's Solana accounts.
    │   ├── AND: **[CRITICAL NODE]** Improper Transaction Handling by Application [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   ├── OR: Lack of Input Validation on Transaction Data [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │   │   └── Action: Inject malicious data into transactions due to insufficient input validation.
    │   │   └── OR: Logic Errors in Application's Transaction Construction [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   │       └── Action: Exploit logic errors in how the application constructs and sends transactions.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities within Solana programs (smart contracts) that the application interacts with. This is a direct attack on the core logic and data handling on the blockchain.
  • Criticality: Very High. Successful exploitation can lead to direct manipulation of on-chain assets, data corruption, and complete compromise of the application's blockchain functionality.
  • Focus Areas for Mitigation:
    • Secure Solana program development lifecycle (secure coding, reviews, audits).
    • Robust input validation and sanitization within programs.
    • Thorough testing and formal verification of program logic.
    • Regular security audits by smart contract security experts.
    • Careful dependency management for SPL programs.
  • Attack Vector: Specifically targeting vulnerabilities in custom Solana programs developed and deployed by the application team. This is often a higher risk than exploiting well-known SPL programs as custom programs may be less scrutinized.
  • Criticality: Very High. Directly impacts the application's unique on-chain functionality and data.
  • Specific High-Risk Sub-Vectors:
    • Program Logic Errors [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting flaws in the program's logic, such as integer overflows/underflows, incorrect state transitions, or reentrancy-like issues (in Solana's context).
      • Action: Crafting transactions that trigger these logic errors to manipulate program state, bypass access controls, or steal assets.
    • Access Control Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Bypassing or subverting the program's access control mechanisms. This could involve privilege escalation or unauthorized access to restricted functions.
      • Action: Exploiting weaknesses in permission checks to perform actions that should be restricted to specific users or roles (e.g., minting tokens without authorization, transferring assets from other accounts).
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities within the Solana Client Library (SDK) used by the application (e.g., solana-web3.js, Rust SDK). This targets the interface between the application and the Solana network.
  • Criticality: High. Can compromise the application's ability to securely interact with the blockchain, leading to data manipulation, unauthorized transactions, or denial of service.
  • Specific High-Risk Sub-Vectors:
    • Vulnerability in Transaction Construction/Signing [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting flaws in how the SDK constructs or signs transactions. This could allow attackers to inject malicious transactions or manipulate transaction parameters.
      • Action: Crafting malicious inputs or exploiting SDK functions to create and sign transactions that perform unintended actions on the blockchain.
    • Vulnerability in Data Parsing/Serialization [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how the SDK parses or serializes data, such as buffer overflows or deserialization flaws.
      • Action: Sending crafted data to the SDK that triggers parsing/serialization vulnerabilities, potentially leading to code execution or data corruption within the application.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities arising from the application's incorrect or insecure usage of Solana features, even if Solana itself is secure. This focuses on application-level integration flaws.
  • Criticality: Very High. Often easier to exploit than core Solana vulnerabilities and can have direct and severe consequences for the application and its users.
  • Specific High-Risk Sub-Vectors:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Insecure Key Management by Application [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Compromising private keys managed by the application due to insecure storage, handling, or generation.
      • Specific High-Risk Sub-Vector:
        • Private Key Exposure [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Private keys being exposed through insecure storage (e.g., in code, logs, client-side storage), accidental leaks, or compromised infrastructure.
          • Action: Stealing exposed private keys to gain full control over associated Solana accounts, enabling unauthorized transactions, data manipulation, and asset theft.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Improper Transaction Handling by Application [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities related to how the application constructs, validates, and sends transactions to the Solana network.
      • Specific High-Risk Sub-Vectors:
        • Lack of Input Validation on Transaction Data [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Insufficient or missing input validation on data included in transactions.
          • Action: Injecting malicious or unexpected data into transaction fields, potentially leading to program logic errors, data corruption, or unintended actions on the blockchain.
        • Logic Errors in Application's Transaction Construction [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Flaws in the application's code that constructs transactions, leading to incorrect transaction parameters, unintended actions, or vulnerabilities.
          • Action: Exploiting logic errors in transaction construction to create transactions that bypass intended security measures, manipulate data, or cause financial loss.