Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
162 lines (119 loc) · 19.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

162 lines (119 loc) · 19.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for solana-labs/solana

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Transaction Prioritization

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Utilize Compute Units and Priority Fees: Leverage Solana's transaction processing mechanism by assigning appropriate compute unit limits and priority fees to transactions. Higher priority fees increase the likelihood of faster transaction inclusion in blocks, especially during network congestion.
    • Step 2: Dynamically Adjust Priority Fees: Implement logic to monitor network congestion (e.g., using recent blockhash data or network status APIs) and dynamically adjust priority fees for transactions. Increase fees during high congestion and potentially lower them during periods of low activity to optimize cost.
    • Step 3: Prioritize Critical Transactions: Identify critical transaction types within the application (e.g., core functionalities, time-sensitive operations) and ensure they are assigned higher priority fees compared to less critical actions.
    • Step 4: User Fee Customization (Optional): Provide users with the option to adjust their transaction priority fees if they require faster processing, giving them control over transaction speed vs. cost.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Transaction Spam and Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks targeting Solana network - Severity: High
    • Network Congestion on Solana impacting timely transaction processing - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Transaction Spam and Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks: Moderately reduces the impact by allowing critical application transactions to be prioritized and processed even when the Solana network is under spam load.
    • Network Congestion on Solana impacting timely transaction processing: Significantly reduces the impact by ensuring important application functions remain responsive even during periods of high Solana network congestion.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Basic priority fee setting might be supported by wallets and SDKs used in the project, but dynamic adjustment and application-level prioritization logic are likely not fully implemented.

  • Missing Implementation: Dynamic priority fee adjustment based on Solana network conditions and application-specific prioritization of transaction types are likely missing from the application's backend and transaction submission logic.

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous Program Auditing of Solana Programs

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Engage Solana Program Security Experts: Specifically hire security auditors with proven expertise in Solana program (smart contract) security and the Rust programming language used for Solana programs.
    • Step 2: Focus on Solana-Specific Vulnerabilities: Ensure the audit scope includes vulnerabilities common in Solana programs, such as rent-related issues, CPI (Cross-Program Invocation) vulnerabilities, account data serialization/deserialization flaws, and vulnerabilities arising from Solana's unique programming model.
    • Step 3: Pre-Deployment and Update Audits: Conduct thorough security audits of all Solana programs before deploying them to the Solana network. Also, perform audits for any significant program updates or modifications.
    • Step 4: Automated Solana Program Analysis Tools: Utilize available automated static analysis tools specifically designed for Solana programs to identify potential vulnerabilities before and during audits.
    • Step 5: Address Audit Findings and Re-Audit: Thoroughly address all vulnerabilities identified in the audit report. Implement recommended fixes and consider a re-audit to verify the effectiveness of the remediations and ensure no new issues were introduced.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Program Vulnerabilities and Bugs in Solana Programs (Reentrancy, Logic Errors, Rent Issues, CPI vulnerabilities) - Severity: High
    • Economic Exploits targeting Solana program logic - Severity: High
    • Data Corruption or Loss due to flaws in Solana program code - Severity: High

  • Impact:

    • Program Vulnerabilities and Bugs in Solana Programs: Significantly reduces the risk of exploitable vulnerabilities in the deployed Solana programs, protecting user funds and application integrity.
    • Economic Exploits targeting Solana program logic: Significantly reduces the risk of financial losses due to exploits of program vulnerabilities on the Solana blockchain.
    • Data Corruption or Loss due to flaws in Solana program code: Significantly reduces the risk of data integrity issues and data loss caused by errors in the Solana program's logic.

  • Currently Implemented: No - A dedicated security audit focused on Solana program vulnerabilities by external experts has not been conducted.

  • Missing Implementation: The entire process of engaging Solana program auditors, conducting the audit, and implementing remediation for Solana program code is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Multi-Signature Accounts for Critical Solana Operations

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify Critical Solana Account Controls: Determine which Solana accounts control critical aspects of the application, such as the program upgrade authority account, treasury accounts holding significant SOL or tokens, and accounts managing core application parameters stored on-chain.
    • Step 2: Convert Critical Accounts to Multi-Sig: Utilize Solana's multi-signature account feature to convert these critical accounts into multi-signature accounts. This requires multiple authorized signers to approve transactions from these accounts.
    • Step 3: Define Appropriate Signature Threshold: Set a suitable signature threshold (number of required signatures) for each multi-signature account. A higher threshold increases security but also adds complexity to transaction authorization.
    • Step 4: Distribute Key Management for Signers: Securely distribute the private keys associated with the signers of the multi-signature accounts to trusted individuals or entities, ensuring no single point of failure in key control. Use secure key storage methods (as described in other mitigation strategies).
    • Step 5: Establish Secure Multi-Sig Transaction Workflow: Implement a clear and secure workflow for initiating, reviewing, and signing transactions from multi-signature accounts. This might involve using dedicated multi-sig tools or custom scripts and secure communication channels.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Private Key Compromise of Solana accounts leading to unauthorized actions - Severity: High
    • Insider Threats and malicious actions by a single Solana key holder - Severity: Medium
    • Unauthorized program upgrades or changes to critical on-chain data - Severity: High
    • Unauthorized transfer of funds from treasury accounts on Solana - Severity: High

  • Impact:

    • Private Key Compromise of Solana accounts: Significantly reduces the impact by requiring multiple key compromises for unauthorized actions, making it much harder for attackers to gain control of critical Solana accounts.
    • Insider Threats and malicious actions by a single Solana key holder: Moderately reduces the risk by preventing a single malicious insider with access to one key from unilaterally executing critical Solana operations.
    • Unauthorized program upgrades or changes to critical on-chain data: Significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized modifications to the application's core Solana programs or on-chain configuration.
    • Unauthorized transfer of funds from treasury accounts on Solana: Significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized draining of funds held in Solana treasury accounts.

  • Currently Implemented: No - Multi-signature accounts are not currently utilized for controlling critical Solana accounts within the application.

  • Missing Implementation: Implementation of multi-signature accounts for program upgrade authority, treasury accounts, and other critical Solana account controls is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Solana SDK Updates and Solana-Specific Dependency Scanning

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Monitor Solana SDK Security Advisories: Actively monitor Solana Foundation's security advisories and release notes specifically for the Solana SDK and related Solana libraries.
    • Step 2: Utilize Solana SDK Dependency Management: Employ dependency management tools appropriate for the chosen Solana SDK (e.g., npm/yarn for JavaScript SDK, Cargo for Rust SDK) to track and manage Solana SDK and its dependencies.
    • Step 3: Prioritize Solana SDK Security Updates: When updating dependencies, prioritize updates to the Solana SDK and related Solana libraries, especially when security patches are released.
    • Step 4: Solana-Focused Vulnerability Scanning: Use vulnerability scanning tools that are effective in identifying vulnerabilities within Solana SDK dependencies and Rust-based Solana programs if applicable.
    • Step 5: Test Solana Integration After SDK Updates: After updating the Solana SDK, thoroughly test the application's integration with the Solana network to ensure compatibility and that no regressions or issues have been introduced in Solana interaction logic.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Solana SDK Vulnerabilities - Severity: Medium to High (depending on the specific vulnerability in the SDK)
    • Client-Side or Backend Vulnerabilities arising from outdated Solana SDK components - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Solana SDK Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation of known vulnerabilities within the Solana SDK itself, protecting the application from SDK-level exploits.
    • Client-Side or Backend Vulnerabilities arising from outdated Solana SDK components: Moderately reduces the risk of vulnerabilities that might be present in older versions of the Solana SDK and its dependencies, improving overall application security posture related to Solana interaction.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Solana SDK updates are likely performed periodically, but a formalized process with specific focus on Solana SDK security advisories and vulnerability scanning tailored for Solana dependencies might be missing.

  • Missing Implementation: A documented process for regularly monitoring Solana SDK security updates, performing Solana-specific vulnerability scanning of SDK dependencies, and promptly applying updates is likely missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Proper Rent Management for Solana Accounts

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Understand Solana Rent Mechanism: Thoroughly understand Solana's rent mechanism, including rent exemption thresholds, rent collection frequency, and the implications of rent for account persistence.
    • Step 2: Design for Rent Exemption: Design the application to create accounts that are rent-exempt whenever feasible. This typically involves allocating sufficient SOL to the account upon creation to meet the rent exemption threshold.
    • Step 3: Monitor Account Balances for Rent: Implement monitoring to track the SOL balances of application-created Solana accounts, especially those that are not rent-exempt. Set up alerts for accounts approaching rent exhaustion.
    • Step 4: Automated Rent Payment/Replenishment: Implement automated mechanisms to replenish SOL in accounts that are at risk of rent exhaustion. This could involve periodically transferring SOL to these accounts from a designated funding source.
    • Step 5: Account Closing for Inactive Accounts: Implement a process to identify and close Solana accounts that are no longer needed or have become inactive. Closing accounts reclaims the SOL held in rent and prevents unnecessary rent accumulation.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Account Dusting and unintended account closure due to rent exhaustion - Severity: Medium
    • Unnecessary SOL expenditure on rent for inactive or poorly managed accounts - Severity: Low
    • Application functionality disruption due to rent-exhausted accounts - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Account Dusting and unintended account closure due to rent exhaustion: Significantly reduces the risk of accounts becoming unusable due to rent exhaustion, ensuring application functionality remains uninterrupted.
    • Unnecessary SOL expenditure on rent for inactive or poorly managed accounts: Moderately reduces unnecessary SOL costs associated with rent, optimizing resource utilization.
    • Application functionality disruption due to rent-exhausted accounts: Significantly reduces the risk of application features failing due to accounts becoming non-functional because of rent exhaustion.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Basic rent considerations might be taken into account during account creation, but comprehensive rent management, monitoring, and automated replenishment/closing mechanisms are likely not fully implemented.

  • Missing Implementation: Automated rent monitoring, replenishment, and account closing strategies are likely missing, leading to potential rent-related issues and inefficiencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Appropriate Solana Commitment Levels

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Understand Solana Commitment Levels: Thoroughly understand the different Solana commitment levels (processed, confirmed, finalized) and their trade-offs in terms of transaction confirmation speed and finality guarantees.
    • Step 2: Choose Commitment Level Based on Operation Criticality: Select the appropriate commitment level for different application operations based on their criticality and user experience requirements.
      • finalized: For high-value transactions or critical operations requiring strong finality guarantees (e.g., fund transfers, important state changes).
      • confirmed: For most common operations where a balance between speed and reasonable finality is desired.
      • processed: For less critical operations where speed is paramount and eventual consistency is acceptable (use with caution).
    • Step 3: Configure SDK and API Calls with Commitment Levels: Explicitly specify the desired commitment level when using the Solana SDK or interacting with Solana APIs to ensure transactions are processed and confirmed according to the chosen level.
    • Step 4: Handle Different Commitment Level Outcomes: Design the application to handle potential scenarios where transactions might not reach the desired commitment level (e.g., due to network issues). Implement appropriate error handling and retry mechanisms.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Application logic errors due to assuming premature transaction finality - Severity: Medium
    • User experience issues due to inconsistent transaction confirmation status - Severity: Low
    • Potential for double-spending or transaction reversions if relying on insufficient commitment levels for critical operations - Severity: Medium to High (depending on operation)

  • Impact:

    • Application logic errors due to assuming premature transaction finality: Moderately reduces the risk of application errors by ensuring the application waits for appropriate confirmation levels before proceeding with dependent operations.
    • User experience issues due to inconsistent transaction confirmation status: Moderately improves user experience by providing more consistent and reliable transaction confirmation feedback.
    • Potential for double-spending or transaction reversions: Moderately to Significantly reduces the risk of financial inconsistencies or transaction reversions by using higher commitment levels for critical operations requiring strong finality.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - The application might be using a default commitment level provided by the SDK or wallet, but explicit and context-aware selection of commitment levels based on operation criticality is likely not fully implemented.

  • Missing Implementation: Logic to dynamically choose and enforce appropriate Solana commitment levels based on the type and criticality of each application operation is likely missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Optimize Transaction Size and Compute Unit Usage in Solana Programs

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Efficient Program Logic: Develop Solana programs with efficient logic to minimize compute unit consumption. Optimize algorithms, data structures, and program flow to reduce computational overhead.
    • Step 2: Minimize Transaction Data Size: Reduce the amount of data included in Solana transactions. Avoid unnecessary data transfers and optimize data serialization/deserialization within programs.
    • Step 3: Account Data Optimization: Design account data structures in Solana programs to be compact and efficient. Minimize storage space and optimize data access patterns to reduce compute unit costs associated with account reads and writes.
    • Step 4: Compute Unit Budgeting and Testing: Carefully budget compute units for different program instructions and transaction types. Thoroughly test program execution under various scenarios to ensure compute unit limits are sufficient and efficiently utilized.
    • Step 5: Program Code Reviews for Efficiency: Conduct code reviews of Solana programs with a focus on identifying and eliminating inefficient code patterns that contribute to unnecessary compute unit consumption or transaction size bloat.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Increased transaction fees due to inefficient programs and large transactions - Severity: Low to Medium
    • Network congestion contribution from unnecessarily large and compute-intensive transactions - Severity: Low to Medium
    • Potential for DoS-like effects from resource-intensive program executions - Severity: Low to Medium

  • Impact:

    • Increased transaction fees: Moderately reduces transaction costs for users and the application by optimizing compute unit usage and transaction size.
    • Network congestion contribution: Moderately reduces the application's contribution to overall Solana network congestion by generating more efficient transactions.
    • Potential for DoS-like effects from resource-intensive program executions: Moderately reduces the risk of program executions becoming resource-intensive enough to contribute to DoS-like conditions on the Solana network or within the application's own resource limits.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Developers likely consider efficiency during program development, but dedicated and systematic optimization efforts with specific focus on compute unit and transaction size reduction might be lacking.

  • Missing Implementation: Formalized processes for compute unit budgeting, transaction size optimization, and code reviews specifically targeting program efficiency in Solana programs are likely missing.