Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
92 lines (73 loc) · 11.4 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

92 lines (73 loc) · 11.4 KB

Threat Model Analysis for solana-labs/solana

Threat: Private Key Theft via Phishing/Social Engineering (leading to Solana account compromise)

  • Threat: Private Key Theft via Phishing/Social Engineering (leading to Solana account compromise)

    • Description: An attacker deceives a user into revealing their Solana private key or seed phrase through a fake website, email, or other deceptive means. The attacker then uses this key to control the user's Solana accounts and assets. While the attack vector is social engineering, the target is the Solana private key, making it directly relevant.
    • Impact: Complete loss of funds associated with the compromised Solana account; unauthorized transactions on the Solana blockchain; potential identity theft related to Solana accounts.
    • Affected Solana Component: User's Solana wallet (external to solana-labs/solana, but the critical point of interaction for Solana access). The application's responsibility is in user education and secure wallet integration specifically for Solana.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Solana-Specific User Education: Educate users extensively on phishing and social engineering, specifically focusing on threats targeting Solana wallets and accounts. Emphasize never sharing seed phrases or private keys.
      • Secure Solana Wallet Integration: Use secure protocols (e.g., WalletConnect, Solana Mobile Stack) for connecting to Solana wallets. Verify the authenticity of the wallet application. Never request or store user private keys within the application.
      • Hardware Wallet Promotion: Strongly encourage users to use hardware wallets for managing their Solana accounts, as these provide a higher level of security against key theft.

Threat: Malicious Program Deployment (on Solana)

  • Threat: Malicious Program Deployment (on Solana)

    • Description: An attacker deploys a malicious Solana program (smart contract) designed to steal funds, corrupt data stored on the Solana blockchain, or disrupt applications interacting with Solana. This could be a program disguised as a legitimate service or one that exploits vulnerabilities in other Solana programs.
    • Impact: Loss of funds held in Solana accounts; corruption of data stored on the Solana blockchain; denial of service for applications interacting with the malicious program; reputational damage to the Solana ecosystem.
    • Affected Solana Component: solana-labs/solana's program deployment and execution mechanisms (specifically, the Program and related modules). The vulnerability lies within the deployed program, but the Solana library is the interface for deployment and interaction.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Rigorous Program Audits: Thoroughly audit all custom Solana programs before deployment, ideally by multiple independent security experts specializing in Solana security.
      • Formal Verification (Solana Programs): Use formal verification techniques where possible to mathematically prove the correctness of Solana program logic.
      • Secure Solana Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices for Rust (the primary language for Solana programs), paying close attention to Solana-specific vulnerabilities.
      • Input Validation (Solana Programs): Rigorously validate all inputs to the Solana program, including account data and instruction data, to prevent exploits.
      • Access Control (Solana Programs): Implement strict access control within the Solana program, limiting who can call specific functions or modify data on the blockchain.
      • Program Upgradeability (with extreme caution): Consider using Solana program upgradeability mechanisms to allow for patching vulnerabilities, but implement very strong security controls around the upgrade process (e.g., multi-signature authorization from trusted parties).
      • Due Diligence on All Solana Programs: Before interacting with any Solana program, verify its authenticity and audit status. Do not blindly trust any deployed program.

Threat: Integer Overflow/Underflow in Solana Program Logic

  • Threat: Integer Overflow/Underflow in Solana Program Logic

    • Description: An attacker crafts a transaction that causes an integer overflow or underflow within a Solana program, leading to unexpected behavior and potentially allowing the attacker to manipulate account balances or other data stored on the Solana blockchain.
    • Impact: Loss of funds held in Solana accounts; corruption of data stored on the Solana blockchain; unauthorized access to resources managed by the Solana program.
    • Affected Solana Component: The custom Solana program's logic (within the Program module). The vulnerability is in the program's code, not the Solana library, but the library executes the flawed code on the blockchain.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use Safe Math Libraries (Solana Programs): Use Rust's checked arithmetic operations (e.g., checked_add, checked_sub) or libraries like safe-transmute within the Solana program to prevent overflows and underflows. Never use unchecked arithmetic operations on untrusted data within a Solana program.
      • Input Validation (Solana Programs): Validate the range of all input values to the Solana program to ensure they cannot cause overflows or underflows.
      • Code Audits (Solana Focus): Specifically look for potential integer overflow/underflow vulnerabilities during code audits of Solana programs.

Threat: Reentrancy Attack in Solana Program Logic

  • Threat: Reentrancy Attack in Solana Program Logic

    • Description: An attacker exploits a reentrancy vulnerability in a Solana program. This occurs when a program calls an external program, and that external program calls back into the original program before the first call has completed. This can lead to unexpected state changes on the Solana blockchain and allow manipulation of the program's logic.
    • Impact: Loss of funds from Solana accounts; corruption of data on the Solana blockchain; unauthorized access to resources managed by the Solana program.
    • Affected Solana Component: The custom Solana program's logic (within the Program module). The vulnerability is in the program's code, not the Solana library, but the library executes the flawed code on the blockchain.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern (Solana Programs): Strictly follow the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern within the Solana program:
        1. Checks: Perform all checks (input validation, authorization) before external calls.
        2. Effects: Update the Solana program's state before external calls.
        3. Interactions: Make external calls after checks and state updates.
      • Reentrancy Guards (Solana Programs): Use reentrancy guards (mutexes or flags) within the Solana program to prevent reentrant calls.
      • Minimize External Calls (Solana Programs): Reduce the use of external calls within the Solana program, especially to untrusted programs.
      • Careful State Management (Solana Programs): Exercise extreme caution when managing state that is accessed by multiple functions within the Solana program, especially if those functions make external calls.

Threat: RPC Node Data Manipulation (affecting Solana interactions)

  • Threat: RPC Node Data Manipulation (affecting Solana interactions)

    • Description: An attacker compromises an RPC node that the application uses to interact with the Solana network. The attacker can then feed the application false data about the Solana blockchain (e.g., incorrect account balances, fabricated transaction confirmations) or censor Solana transactions.
    • Impact: Incorrect application behavior based on false Solana data; loss of funds (if the application relies on false data to make decisions); denial of service for Solana interactions.
    • Affected Solana Component: The RPC client within solana-labs/solana (e.g., RpcClient). The vulnerability is external to the library, but the library is the point of interaction with the potentially compromised RPC node.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Multiple Solana RPC Nodes: Use multiple, independent Solana RPC nodes and compare their responses. Discrepancies indicate a potential problem.
      • Run Your Own Solana Node: If feasible, run your own Solana RPC node to have full control over the data source and eliminate reliance on third-party nodes.
      • Data Validation (Solana Data): Validate data received from Solana RPC nodes. Check blockhashes and signatures to ensure consistency with the expected state of the Solana blockchain.
      • Secure Connections (to Solana RPC): Use secure communication channels (e.g., HTTPS) to connect to Solana RPC nodes.
      • Reputable Solana RPC Providers: Use RPC nodes provided by reputable and trusted entities within the Solana ecosystem.

Threat: Deserialization errors (within Solana Programs)

  • Threat: Deserialization errors (within Solana Programs)

    • Description: An attacker sends crafted data to a Solana program that causes errors during deserialization, potentially leading to crashes or unexpected behavior on the Solana blockchain. This is particularly relevant when using borsh or other serialization libraries within the Solana program.
    • Impact: Denial of service for the Solana program, potential for arbitrary code execution (depending on the specific vulnerability and serialization library used within the Solana program).
    • Affected Solana Component: The Solana program's data handling logic, specifically the deserialization process (often involving borsh within the Program module).
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Schema Validation (Solana Programs): Use a well-defined schema for all serialized data within the Solana program and rigorously validate incoming data against that schema before deserialization.
      • Safe Deserialization Libraries (Solana Programs): Use well-vetted and secure deserialization libraries (like borsh) within the Solana program and keep them up-to-date.
      • Input Sanitization (Solana Programs): Sanitize all input data to the Solana program to remove any potentially malicious characters or patterns.
      • Fuzz Testing (Solana Programs): Use fuzzing techniques to test the deserialization process within the Solana program with a wide range of unexpected inputs.
      • Limit Data Size (Solana Programs): Enforce limits on the size of data that can be deserialized within the Solana program to prevent memory exhaustion attacks.