Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
157 lines (140 loc) · 15.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

157 lines (140 loc) · 15.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for swc-project/swc

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update SWC

Description:

  • Step 1: Monitor SWC project's GitHub releases, npm security advisories, and official communication channels specifically for security updates.
  • Step 2: Check for new SWC versions regularly (e.g., weekly or monthly), prioritizing security releases.
  • Step 3: Review release notes and changelogs of new SWC versions for security-related fixes.
  • Step 4: Update the @swc/core and related SWC packages in your package.json to the latest stable version when security updates are available.
  • Step 5: Thoroughly test your application after updating SWC to ensure compatibility and no regressions are introduced by the update.
  • Step 6: Deploy the updated application with the patched SWC version promptly. Threats Mitigated:
  • Exploitation of Known SWC Vulnerabilities - Severity: High - Outdated SWC versions may contain publicly known security flaws that attackers can exploit. Impact:
  • Exploitation of Known SWC Vulnerabilities: High reduction - Directly patches known vulnerabilities within SWC itself. Currently Implemented: Partially - Dependency updates are performed, but security-focused SWC updates might not be prioritized or expedited.
    • Implemented in: Project dependency update process. Missing Implementation: Dedicated process for tracking SWC security advisories and a fast-track update procedure specifically for security patches in SWC.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Scanning for SWC Dependencies

Description:

  • Step 1: Integrate a dependency scanning tool (like npm audit, yarn audit, or dedicated tools) into your workflow and CI/CD pipeline.
  • Step 2: Configure the tool to scan specifically for vulnerabilities in the transitive dependencies of @swc/core and other SWC packages you use.
  • Step 3: Run dependency scans regularly (e.g., on each build, commit, or merge request).
  • Step 4: Review scan results focusing on vulnerabilities originating from SWC's dependency tree.
  • Step 5: Investigate reported vulnerabilities and determine if they impact your application's usage of SWC.
  • Step 6: Update vulnerable dependencies of SWC indirectly by updating SWC itself if a newer version resolves the dependency issue, or by using dependency resolution overrides if necessary and safe.
  • Step 7: Re-run scans to confirm vulnerability resolution. Threats Mitigated:
  • Vulnerabilities in SWC's Transitive Dependencies - Severity: High - SWC relies on other libraries, which may have their own vulnerabilities that could indirectly affect SWC and your application.
  • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised SWC Dependencies - Severity: Medium - If a dependency of SWC is compromised, it could indirectly impact SWC's security. Impact:
  • Vulnerabilities in SWC's Transitive Dependencies: High reduction - Identifies and helps remediate vulnerabilities within the libraries SWC depends on.
  • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised SWC Dependencies: Medium reduction - Increases awareness of potential risks from SWC's supply chain. Currently Implemented: Partially - npm audit is run occasionally, but not specifically focused on SWC's dependencies and not integrated into CI/CD for every build.
    • Implemented in: Local development environment occasionally. Missing Implementation: Automated dependency scanning integrated into CI/CD, specifically targeting SWC's dependency tree, with automated reporting and a defined remediation process.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Sanitization and Validation for SWC Code Transformation Plugins

Description:

  • Step 1: Identify if you are using or developing custom SWC plugins that process external or user-provided input to influence code transformation.
  • Step 2: For each input point to SWC plugins, define strict validation rules based on expected data types, formats, and allowed values.
  • Step 3: Implement input sanitization and validation routines before passing data to SWC plugins for code transformation.
  • Step 4: Sanitize input to remove or escape potentially harmful characters or code constructs that could be interpreted as code by SWC or its plugins.
  • Step 5: Validate input against defined rules and reject invalid input, preventing it from being processed by SWC plugins.
  • Step 6: Log invalid input attempts for security monitoring and potential incident response related to SWC plugin usage. Threats Mitigated:
  • Code Injection via Malicious Input to SWC Plugins - Severity: High - Malicious input could be crafted to manipulate SWC plugins into generating unintended or harmful code.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) if SWC-transformed code is rendered in a browser - Severity: High - If plugins process input that ends up in client-side code, vulnerabilities could lead to XSS.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) through crafted malicious input to plugins - Severity: Medium - Malformed input could cause SWC plugins to consume excessive resources or crash. Impact:
  • Code Injection via Malicious Input to SWC Plugins: High reduction - Prevents injection attacks by ensuring input processed by SWC plugins is safe.
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): High reduction - Reduces XSS risks if SWC plugins handle data that could end up in browser-rendered code.
  • Denial of Service (DoS): Medium reduction - Can mitigate some DoS attacks by rejecting malformed input before it reaches SWC plugins. Currently Implemented: No - No custom SWC plugins directly processing user input are currently in use.
    • Implemented in: N/A Missing Implementation: Mandatory implementation if custom SWC plugins are developed that handle external or user-provided data. Security guidelines and code review processes should include input validation for SWC plugins.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Review of SWC Configuration and Usage

Description:

  • Step 1: Include SWC configuration files (.swcrc, swc.config.js, etc.) and code integrating SWC into the build process in regular code reviews.
  • Step 2: Educate developers on secure SWC configuration practices and potential security implications of different SWC settings and plugin choices.
  • Step 3: During code reviews, specifically examine:
    • SWC configuration for overly permissive or insecure transformations that might introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Selection and usage of SWC plugins, ensuring they are from trusted sources and used securely.
    • Overall SWC integration code for potential misconfigurations or insecure practices.
    • Compliance with documented SWC best practices and security recommendations.
  • Step 4: Ensure code reviewers have sufficient understanding of SWC and its security aspects to effectively review configurations and usage.
  • Step 5: Maintain and communicate secure SWC configuration guidelines to the development team. Threats Mitigated:
  • Misconfiguration of SWC leading to vulnerabilities - Severity: Medium - Incorrect SWC settings could unintentionally create security weaknesses.
  • Use of Insecure or Vulnerable SWC Plugins - Severity: High - Choosing and using untrusted or vulnerable plugins can directly introduce security risks.
  • Unintentional introduction of insecure code transformations by SWC - Severity: Medium - Misunderstanding SWC features could lead to insecure code generation. Impact:
  • Misconfiguration of SWC leading to vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - Human review can catch configuration errors that automated tools might miss.
  • Use of Insecure or Vulnerable SWC Plugins: Medium reduction - Code review can help identify risky plugin choices and usage patterns.
  • Unintentional introduction of insecure code transformations by SWC: Medium reduction - Reviewers can spot potentially insecure code transformations resulting from SWC configuration. Currently Implemented: Yes - Code reviews are standard practice, but specific focus on SWC security configuration and plugin usage needs to be strengthened.
    • Implemented in: Standard code review process. Missing Implementation: Formalize SWC security configuration and plugin review as a specific checklist item in code reviews. Provide targeted training to reviewers on SWC security best practices and plugin security considerations.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits for SWC Compilation Processes

Description:

  • Step 1: Identify environments where SWC compilation runs (local dev, CI/CD, build servers).
  • Step 2: Configure resource limits (CPU time, memory usage, process count) specifically for processes executing SWC.
  • Step 3: Utilize operating system tools (e.g., ulimit, cgroups), containerization features (Docker resource limits), or CI/CD platform settings to enforce these limits.
  • Step 4: Set limits that allow normal SWC compilation to complete successfully but prevent excessive resource consumption in case of vulnerabilities or malicious input.
  • Step 5: Monitor resource usage of SWC compilation processes to fine-tune limits and detect anomalies.
  • Step 6: Implement alerts to trigger if SWC processes exceed defined resource limits, indicating potential DoS attempts or unexpected behavior. Threats Mitigated:
  • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks exploiting SWC vulnerabilities - Severity: Medium - Vulnerabilities in SWC could be exploited to cause excessive resource consumption during compilation, leading to DoS.
  • Resource exhaustion due to inefficient or malicious code processed by SWC - Severity: Medium - Processing certain code patterns through SWC might unintentionally or intentionally lead to resource exhaustion. Impact:
  • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks exploiting SWC vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - Limits the impact of DoS by preventing uncontrolled resource usage by SWC.
  • Resource exhaustion due to inefficient or malicious code processed by SWC: Medium reduction - Prevents build process crashes and resource starvation due to SWC. Currently Implemented: Partially - General server resource limits might exist, but no specific limits are configured for SWC processes.
    • Implemented in: Underlying server infrastructure (general limits). Missing Implementation: Explicit configuration of resource limits tailored for SWC compilation processes in CI/CD and build server environments.

Mitigation Strategy: Sandboxing or Isolation of SWC Compilation Environment

Description:

  • Step 1: Run SWC compilation processes within a sandboxed or isolated environment.
  • Step 2: Utilize containerization technologies like Docker or lightweight virtualization to create isolated environments for SWC compilation.
  • Step 3: Restrict the network access, file system access, and system call capabilities of the SWC compilation environment to the minimum necessary for its operation.
  • Step 4: Ensure that sensitive data and critical system resources are not directly accessible from the SWC compilation environment.
  • Step 5: Regularly review and harden the security configuration of the SWC compilation sandbox. Threats Mitigated:
  • Exploitation of SWC Vulnerabilities leading to broader system compromise - Severity: High - If a vulnerability in SWC allows code execution, sandboxing limits the attacker's ability to pivot to other parts of the system.
  • Data Breaches due to compromised SWC process - Severity: Medium - Sandboxing reduces the risk of sensitive data being accessed if the SWC process is compromised. Impact:
  • Exploitation of SWC Vulnerabilities leading to broader system compromise: High reduction - Significantly limits the blast radius of a potential SWC vulnerability exploitation.
  • Data Breaches due to compromised SWC process: Medium reduction - Reduces the potential for data access from a compromised SWC process. Currently Implemented: No - SWC compilation currently runs within the standard build environment without specific sandboxing or isolation measures.
    • Implemented in: N/A Missing Implementation: Implementing container-based or virtualized sandboxing for SWC compilation in CI/CD and build server environments.

Mitigation Strategy: Follow SWC Best Practices and Documentation

Description:

  • Step 1: Ensure developers are familiar with and actively follow the official SWC documentation and best practices for configuration and usage.
  • Step 2: Regularly review the SWC documentation for updates and security recommendations.
  • Step 3: Avoid using deprecated or discouraged SWC features or configurations that might have known security implications.
  • Step 4: Understand the security implications of different SWC features and configuration options before implementing them.
  • Step 5: When in doubt about secure SWC usage, consult the official documentation, community forums, or seek expert advice. Threats Mitigated:
  • Misconfiguration of SWC due to lack of understanding - Severity: Medium - Incorrect usage due to lack of knowledge can lead to vulnerabilities.
  • Use of insecure SWC features or configurations - Severity: Medium - Using features in unintended or insecure ways can create weaknesses. Impact:
  • Misconfiguration of SWC due to lack of understanding: Medium reduction - Reduces errors arising from lack of knowledge by promoting best practices.
  • Use of insecure SWC features or configurations: Medium reduction - Encourages secure usage patterns and discourages risky configurations. Currently Implemented: Partially - Developers generally follow documentation, but formal training or enforced best practices for SWC security might be lacking.
    • Implemented in: General development practices. Missing Implementation: Formalize training on secure SWC usage and best practices for developers. Create internal guidelines based on SWC documentation and security recommendations.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Review SWC Configuration

Description:

  • Step 1: Schedule periodic reviews of your project's SWC configuration files (.swcrc, swc.config.js, etc.).
  • Step 2: During reviews, reassess the security implications of current SWC settings in light of evolving threats and SWC updates.
  • Step 3: Verify that the SWC configuration still aligns with your application's security requirements and best practices.
  • Step 4: Identify and address any outdated, overly permissive, or potentially insecure configurations.
  • Step 5: Document the rationale behind specific SWC configuration choices to ensure maintainability and security understanding over time. Threats Mitigated:
  • Configuration drift leading to insecure SWC settings - Severity: Medium - Over time, configurations can become outdated or misaligned with security needs.
  • Accumulation of insecure or unnecessary SWC features enabled - Severity: Medium - Features enabled for past needs might become security risks if not reviewed. Impact:
  • Configuration drift leading to insecure SWC settings: Medium reduction - Regular reviews prevent configurations from becoming outdated and insecure.
  • Accumulation of insecure or unnecessary SWC features enabled: Medium reduction - Helps identify and disable potentially risky or unnecessary features. Currently Implemented: No - No scheduled or formal reviews of SWC configuration are currently performed.
    • Implemented in: N/A Missing Implementation: Implement a schedule for periodic security reviews of SWC configuration as part of regular security maintenance activities.