Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
146 lines (133 loc) · 20 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

146 lines (133 loc) · 20 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for tauri-apps/tauri

Mitigation Strategy: 1. Strict Input Validation and Sanitization for Tauri Commands

  • Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation and Sanitization for Tauri Commands
  • Description:
    1. Identify all Tauri commands: List every command exposed from your Rust backend to the frontend via #[tauri::command].
    2. Define expected input types and formats: For each command, clearly define the expected data type, format, and allowed values for each argument passed from the frontend. Consider the data types that can be serialized and deserialized across the Tauri IPC bridge.
    3. Implement validation logic in Rust command handlers: Within each Tauri command handler function in your Rust code, add validation logic at the beginning. Use Rust's strong typing and libraries like serde for deserialization and validation.
      • Check data types after deserialization.
      • Validate formats using libraries or custom logic appropriate for the expected input (e.g., regex for strings, range checks for numbers).
      • Enforce allowed value sets or ranges.
    4. Sanitize input data in Rust: After validation, sanitize input data within the Rust command handler to prevent potential issues when processing the data in the backend. This might include escaping characters for shell commands (if unavoidable, though highly discouraged in Tauri commands) or database queries.
    5. Handle invalid input gracefully in Rust: If validation fails in a Tauri command, return a structured error response back to the frontend using Result and Tauri's error handling mechanisms. Provide informative error messages to the frontend (without revealing sensitive backend details) and log detailed errors securely on the backend.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Command Injection via Tauri IPC (High Severity): Malicious frontend code could craft inputs passed through Tauri commands to manipulate backend operations in unintended and harmful ways. This is a direct threat vector introduced by Tauri's command system.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Backend Data Processing (High Severity): If Tauri commands process frontend input and the backend logic is vulnerable to injection flaws, it can indirectly lead to XSS if the backend data is later displayed in the frontend without proper encoding.
    • Backend Logic Errors due to Unexpected Input (Medium Severity): Invalid input from the frontend via Tauri commands can cause unexpected behavior, crashes, or data corruption in the Rust backend logic.
  • Impact:
    • Command Injection via Tauri IPC: High risk reduction. Directly addresses and significantly reduces the risk of command injection vulnerabilities originating from the Tauri IPC bridge.
    • XSS via Backend Data Processing: Medium risk reduction. Reduces the likelihood of backend-induced XSS by ensuring data processed by commands is validated and sanitized.
    • Backend Logic Errors due to Unexpected Input: Medium risk reduction. Improves the robustness and stability of the backend by preventing errors caused by malformed frontend input through Tauri commands.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented in the userProfileUpdate command in src-tauri/src/commands.rs. Basic type checking is present, but more robust format validation and sanitization specific to Tauri command inputs are needed.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Comprehensive input validation and sanitization are missing for most Tauri commands in src-tauri/src/commands.rs.
    • Frontend input validation is minimal, relying too heavily on backend validation for Tauri command inputs.

Mitigation Strategy: 2. Command Allowlisting

  • Mitigation Strategy: Command Allowlisting
  • Description:
    1. Review all #[tauri::command] functions: Examine every function in your Rust backend marked with #[tauri::command].
    2. Identify essential Tauri commands: Determine which commands are absolutely necessary for the core functionality of your Tauri application's frontend-backend interaction.
    3. Remove or consolidate unnecessary Tauri commands: Eliminate any Tauri commands that are not strictly required for the application's core features or that expose overly broad or sensitive backend functionality to the frontend. Consolidate commands where possible to reduce the overall command surface area.
    4. Document the Tauri command allowlist: Create a clear list of all allowed Tauri commands, their purpose, and the data they handle. This documentation should be maintained and reviewed regularly as the application evolves.
    5. Regularly review the Tauri command allowlist: Periodically reassess the list of exposed Tauri commands to ensure it remains minimal and aligned with the application's security posture and functional requirements. Remove commands that become obsolete or are deemed too risky to expose via Tauri IPC.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Command Execution via Tauri IPC (High Severity): Reduces the attack surface of the Tauri application by limiting the number of backend functions accessible from the frontend through Tauri commands. This directly mitigates risks associated with Tauri's command system.
    • Accidental Exposure of Sensitive Backend Functionality via Tauri IPC (Medium Severity): Prevents unintentional exposure of internal or privileged backend operations through overly permissive registration of Tauri commands.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Command Execution via Tauri IPC: High risk reduction. Significantly limits the potential for attackers to exploit the Tauri command system to execute unintended backend operations.
    • Accidental Exposure of Sensitive Backend Functionality via Tauri IPC: Medium risk reduction. Reduces the chance of inadvertently exposing sensitive backend features through unnecessary Tauri commands.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Only a limited set of commands related to user profile and application settings are currently exposed as Tauri commands.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal documentation of the Tauri command allowlist is missing.
    • A regular review process for the Tauri command allowlist is not yet established.
    • Potential for further reduction of the Tauri command surface area needs to be investigated.

Mitigation Strategy: 3. Webview Security and Isolation

  • Mitigation Strategy: Webview Security and Isolation
  • Description:
    1. Regular Tauri and Webview Updates: Keep Tauri itself and the underlying webview runtime (provided by the operating system) updated to the latest versions. Tauri updates often include security patches for the webview integration and framework itself.
    2. Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong Content Security Policy (CSP) in your application's HTML to restrict the sources of content the webview can load. This is crucial for mitigating XSS attacks within the Tauri webview context.
    3. Evaluate isolationPattern Feature: If your application handles highly sensitive data or requires strong isolation between the webview and the backend, carefully evaluate Tauri's isolationPattern feature. Understand the performance and complexity trade-offs before implementing it.
    4. Disable Unnecessary Webview Features via Tauri Configuration: Review the tauri.conf.json file and disable any webview features that are not essential for your application's functionality. For example, if nodeIntegration is not required, ensure it is disabled to reduce the attack surface of the webview.
    5. Monitor Webview Permissions: Be mindful of the permissions requested by the webview and granted by the operating system. Minimize the required permissions to only those necessary for the application's features.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) within Tauri Webview (High Severity): Exploiting vulnerabilities in the webview to inject and execute malicious scripts within the application's frontend context. This is a primary threat in webview-based applications like Tauri.
    • Webview Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Known vulnerabilities in the underlying webview runtime itself can be exploited if Tauri and the webview are not kept updated.
    • Information Disclosure via Webview Exploits (Medium to High Severity): Successful webview exploits can potentially lead to information disclosure by accessing local storage, session data, or other application resources within the webview context.
  • Impact:
    • XSS within Tauri Webview: High risk reduction. CSP is a critical defense against XSS attacks within the Tauri webview. Regular updates also patch webview-related vulnerabilities.
    • Webview Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Keeping Tauri and the webview updated directly addresses known vulnerabilities in the webview runtime.
    • Information Disclosure via Webview Exploits: Medium to High risk reduction. Webview security measures minimize the potential for information leakage through webview exploits.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. CSP is not implemented. Tauri and dependency updates are performed occasionally. nodeIntegration is currently disabled in tauri.conf.json.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • CSP needs to be defined and implemented in the index.html file.
    • A regular schedule for Tauri and webview updates needs to be established.
    • Evaluation of isolationPattern for enhanced isolation is needed.
    • Review and further minimization of webview features in tauri.conf.json should be considered.

Mitigation Strategy: 4. Local File System Access Control via Tauri APIs

  • Mitigation Strategy: Local File System Access Control via Tauri APIs
  • Description:
    1. Minimize Direct File System Access: Restrict the application's need to access the local file system as much as possible. Re-evaluate features that require file system access and explore alternative approaches if feasible.
    2. Use Tauri Path APIs (tauri::path): Always utilize Tauri's provided path APIs (tauri::path) to construct and manipulate file paths within Tauri commands. Avoid directly constructing file paths as strings, as this can be error-prone and lead to path traversal vulnerabilities.
    3. Restrict Access to Specific Directories: When using Tauri's file system APIs, limit access to specific, well-defined directories instead of granting broad file system access. Use functions like BaseDirectory to target specific application directories.
    4. Implement Permission Checks in Rust: Before performing any file system operations within Tauri commands, implement robust permission checks in your Rust backend code. Verify that the application has the necessary permissions to access and modify the requested files or directories.
    5. Avoid Exposing Raw File Paths to Frontend: Do not expose raw file paths directly to the frontend if possible. Instead, use abstract identifiers or handles that are resolved to secure file paths within the backend.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities (High Severity): If file paths are not properly validated and controlled, attackers could potentially manipulate paths to access files outside of the intended application directories, leading to unauthorized file access or modification. This is a significant risk in desktop applications like Tauri that interact with the local file system.
    • Unauthorized File Access (High Severity): Insufficient access control can allow the application (or a compromised frontend) to access or modify sensitive files on the user's system beyond what is necessary for its intended functionality.
    • Data Integrity Issues (Medium Severity): Uncontrolled file system access can lead to accidental or malicious modification or deletion of important application data or user files.
  • Impact:
    • Path Traversal Vulnerabilities: High risk reduction. Using Tauri's path APIs and proper validation significantly mitigates path traversal attacks.
    • Unauthorized File Access: High risk reduction. Restricting access to specific directories and implementing permission checks prevents unauthorized file system operations.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Medium risk reduction. Controlled file system access reduces the risk of data corruption or loss due to unintended file operations.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Tauri path APIs are used in some file operations, but consistent and comprehensive permission checks and directory restrictions are missing.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Systematic review and implementation of Tauri path APIs for all file system operations in backend commands.
    • Implementation of robust permission checks before all file system operations in Rust commands.
    • Restriction of file system access to specific directories using Tauri's path API configurations.
    • Avoidance of exposing raw file paths to the frontend.

Mitigation Strategy: 5. Secure Application Updates via Tauri Updater

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Application Updates via Tauri Updater
  • Description:
    1. Enable Tauri Updater: Utilize Tauri's built-in updater mechanism to provide secure and automated application updates.
    2. HTTPS for Update Downloads: Configure the Tauri updater to download update packages exclusively over HTTPS. This is essential to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks and ensure the integrity of downloaded updates.
    3. Code Signing for Updates: Sign your application update packages with a valid code signing certificate. Tauri's updater can verify the signature of updates before applying them, ensuring that updates are from a trusted source and have not been tampered with.
    4. Update Manifest Verification: Ensure that the Tauri updater verifies the integrity and authenticity of the update manifest file. This manifest should also be served over HTTPS and ideally signed.
    5. User Notification and Control: Provide clear user notifications about available updates and allow users to control when updates are applied (e.g., defer updates, choose update times). Avoid forced, silent updates that can be disruptive and raise security concerns.
    6. Rollback Mechanism (Optional but Recommended): Consider implementing a rollback mechanism in conjunction with the Tauri updater to allow users to revert to a previous version of the application in case an update introduces issues.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks on Updates (High Severity): Without HTTPS and code signing, attackers could intercept update requests and inject malicious update packages, compromising the application and potentially the user's system. This is a critical threat for application updates.
    • Tampered Updates (High Severity): If updates are not signed and verified, attackers could distribute modified versions of the application containing malware or vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Update Server (Medium to High Severity): If the update server or infrastructure is compromised, attackers could potentially distribute malicious updates to a wide range of users. Secure update mechanisms mitigate the impact of such compromises.
  • Impact:
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks on Updates: High risk reduction. HTTPS and code signing effectively prevent MITM attacks during update downloads.
    • Tampered Updates: High risk reduction. Code signing ensures the integrity and authenticity of updates, preventing the installation of malicious or compromised versions.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Update Server: Medium to High risk reduction. While not a complete mitigation, secure update mechanisms make it significantly harder for attackers to distribute malicious updates even if the update server is compromised.
  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. Tauri updater is not currently enabled or configured in the application.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Enable and configure the Tauri updater in tauri.conf.json.
    • Implement code signing for application update packages.
    • Configure HTTPS for update manifest and package downloads.
    • Implement user notification and control over the update process.
    • Consider implementing a rollback mechanism for updates.

Mitigation Strategy: 6. Third-Party Tauri Plugin Security

  • Mitigation Strategy: Third-Party Tauri Plugin Security
  • Description:
    1. Minimize Plugin Usage: Reduce the reliance on third-party Tauri plugins as much as possible. Evaluate if plugin functionality can be implemented directly within your application's Rust backend or frontend code to reduce external dependencies.
    2. Careful Plugin Selection: Exercise extreme caution when selecting and incorporating third-party Tauri plugins. Thoroughly vet and audit plugins before adding them to your project.
    3. Plugin Source Trust: Prioritize plugins from trusted and reputable sources. Check the plugin's maintainership, community activity, security track record, and code repository (if available).
    4. Plugin Permissions Review: Carefully review the permissions and capabilities requested by third-party plugins. Understand what system resources and APIs the plugin accesses. Ensure that plugins only request the necessary permissions and do not introduce unnecessary security risks.
    5. Plugin Code Audits (if feasible): If possible and if the plugin's source code is available, conduct security code audits of third-party plugins to identify potential vulnerabilities or malicious code.
    6. Regular Plugin Updates and Monitoring: Keep track of updates for any third-party Tauri plugins you use. Monitor for security advisories and apply plugin updates promptly to patch any discovered vulnerabilities.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Malicious Plugin Code (High Severity): Third-party plugins could contain malicious code that could compromise the application, user data, or the user's system. This is a significant supply chain risk when using external plugins.
    • Vulnerable Plugin Code (High Severity): Plugins may contain security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers to compromise the application or user systems.
    • Unintended Plugin Permissions (Medium Severity): Plugins might request overly broad permissions that could be misused, even if the plugin itself is not intentionally malicious.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious Plugin Code: High risk reduction. Careful plugin selection, source trust evaluation, and code audits (if possible) significantly reduce the risk of incorporating malicious plugins.
    • Vulnerable Plugin Code: High risk reduction. Regular plugin updates and monitoring for security advisories mitigate the risk of using vulnerable plugins.
    • Unintended Plugin Permissions: Medium risk reduction. Plugin permission reviews help ensure that plugins only have the necessary access and minimize the potential for misuse of excessive permissions.
  • Currently Implemented: Not currently using any third-party Tauri plugins.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Establish a formal process for vetting and approving third-party Tauri plugins before they are added to the project, should plugin usage become necessary.
    • Define guidelines for plugin security reviews and permission assessments.
    • Implement a system for tracking and updating third-party plugins if they are used in the future.