Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
44 lines (35 loc) · 5.09 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

44 lines (35 loc) · 5.09 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for tokio-rs/axum

Objective: To achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) or Denial of Service (DoS) on the Axum-based application by exploiting vulnerabilities specific to the Axum framework or its dependencies.

Attack Tree Visualization

[Root: RCE or DoS on Axum Application] | *--- [Sub-Goal: Exploit Axum Middleware/Layers] *** | *--- [!]C3: Dependency Vuln (Critical Node) | *--- C3a: Vulnerable Dependency

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: [!]C3: Dependency Vulnerabilities (in Middleware/Layers)

  • Likelihood: High. Dependencies are frequently updated, and new vulnerabilities are regularly discovered in popular libraries. Axum, being built on top of other crates (like hyper and tokio), inherits their potential vulnerabilities. The more dependencies an application has, the higher the likelihood that at least one will have a known or zero-day vulnerability.
  • Impact: High to Critical. A vulnerability in a dependency can range from information disclosure to complete system compromise (RCE). The impact depends entirely on the specific vulnerability. A vulnerability in a core component like hyper could be catastrophic.
  • Effort: Low to Medium. Exploiting a known vulnerability often requires minimal effort, as proof-of-concept code or even automated exploit tools may be publicly available. Exploiting a zero-day requires significantly more effort and skill.
  • Skill Level: Variable. Exploiting a known vulnerability can be done by script kiddies using publicly available tools. Discovering and exploiting a zero-day requires advanced skills.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High. While vulnerability scanners can detect known vulnerabilities, zero-days are by definition unknown. Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) might detect exploit attempts, but sophisticated attackers can often bypass these. Log analysis can reveal suspicious activity, but requires careful configuration and monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path: Exploit Axum Middleware/Layers -> Vulnerable Dependency (C3a)

  • Description: This path represents the attacker exploiting a known vulnerability in a dependency used by the Axum application, either directly or indirectly (through middleware or a library). This is the most likely path to a successful attack.

  • Detailed Steps (Example - Hypothetical Vulnerability in hyper):

    1. Reconnaissance: The attacker identifies the target application and, through various techniques (e.g., HTTP headers, error messages, fingerprinting), determines that it's built using Axum.
    2. Vulnerability Research: The attacker researches known vulnerabilities in Axum and its common dependencies (e.g., hyper, tokio, serde). They find a hypothetical vulnerability in hyper that allows for a buffer overflow when handling a specially crafted HTTP request.
    3. Exploit Development/Acquisition: The attacker either develops an exploit for the vulnerability or finds a publicly available one (e.g., on Exploit-DB, GitHub, or security forums).
    4. Exploit Delivery: The attacker sends the crafted HTTP request to the Axum application.
    5. Exploitation: The vulnerable hyper code within Axum's request handling process is triggered, leading to a buffer overflow.
    6. Payload Execution: Depending on the vulnerability, the attacker might achieve:
      • RCE: The attacker gains the ability to execute arbitrary code on the server, potentially leading to full system compromise.
      • DoS: The attacker crashes the application or makes it unresponsive, denying service to legitimate users.
    7. Post-Exploitation: If RCE is achieved, the attacker might install backdoors, steal data, pivot to other systems, or use the compromised server for further attacks.

  • Mitigation (Specific to this path):

    • Regular Dependency Updates: This is the most crucial mitigation. Use cargo update frequently and consider automated dependency update tools.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Employ tools like cargo audit, Snyk, or OWASP Dependency-Check to automatically identify known vulnerabilities in your dependencies.
    • Dependency Pinning (with caution): While pinning dependencies can provide stability, it also means you won't automatically get security updates. Use with caution and have a robust process for updating pinned dependencies.
    • Runtime Monitoring: Use tools that can detect and potentially block exploit attempts at runtime (e.g., Web Application Firewalls (WAFs), Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)).
    • Least Privilege: Run the application with the minimum necessary privileges to limit the impact of a successful exploit.
    • Security Hardening: Follow general security best practices for the operating system and any other software running on the server.