Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
333 lines (283 loc) · 23.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

333 lines (283 loc) · 23.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for tokio-rs/tokio

Objective: To disrupt the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of an application leveraging Tokio's asynchronous runtime, by exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations stemming from Tokio's core functionalities and features.

Attack Tree Visualization

  • Attack Goal: Compromise Tokio-Based Application [CRITICAL NODE]
      1. Denial of Service (DoS) [CRITICAL NODE]
      • 1.1. Resource Exhaustion [CRITICAL NODE]
        • 1.1.1. Task Queue Saturation [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
          • 1.1.1.1. Spawn Excessive Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • 1.1.2. Memory Exhaustion [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
          • 1.1.2.1. Memory Leaks in Async Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • 1.1.2.2. Excessive Buffer Allocation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • 1.1.3. Thread Pool Exhaustion (Tokio Runtime) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
          • 1.1.3.1. Block Tokio Runtime Threads [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • 1.1.4. Network Resource Exhaustion (If application uses Tokio's networking) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
          • 1.1.4.1. Connection Flooding [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • 1.1.4.2. Slowloris/Slow HTTP Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • 1.1.4.3. Data Flooding [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • 1.2. Tokio Runtime Panics/Crashes [CRITICAL NODE]
        • 1.2.1. Unhandled Panics in Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      • 1.2.3. Bugs in Tokio Itself [CRITICAL NODE]
      1. Integrity Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]
      • 2.1. Race Conditions in Async Code [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
        • 2.1.1. Data Corruption due to Shared Mutable State [HIGH-RISK PATH]
      1. Confidentiality Breach [CRITICAL NODE]
      • 3.1. Information Leaks through Error Handling [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
        • 3.1.1. Verbose Error Messages Exposing Internal State [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Attack Goal: Compromise Tokio-Based Application [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: The overarching goal of an attacker targeting the application. Success means achieving a breach of availability, integrity, or confidentiality.
  • Likelihood: Varies depending on specific attack path.
  • Impact: Critical - Full compromise of the application.
  • Effort: Varies depending on specific attack path.
  • Skill Level: Varies depending on specific attack path.
  • Detection Difficulty: Varies depending on specific attack path.
  • Mitigation Strategies: Implement comprehensive security measures across all attack vectors outlined below.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Denial of Service (DoS) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Making the application unavailable to legitimate users.
  • Likelihood: High - DoS attacks are common and relatively easy to execute.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - Application outage, business disruption.
  • Effort: Minimal to Medium - Depending on the specific DoS vector.
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate - Depending on the specific DoS vector.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium - DoS attacks often manifest as performance degradation and resource exhaustion.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement rate limiting at various levels (application, network).
    • Set resource quotas and limits (task creation, memory usage, connections).
    • Employ network-level DoS protection mechanisms (firewalls, load balancers).
    • Monitor application performance and resource usage for anomalies.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Resource Exhaustion [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Depleting application resources (CPU, memory, network) to cause DoS.
  • Likelihood: High - Resource exhaustion is a common and effective DoS technique.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - Application slowdown or outage.
  • Effort: Minimal to Medium - Depending on the specific resource exhaustion vector.
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate - Depending on the specific resource exhaustion vector.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Requires monitoring resource usage patterns.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement resource limits and quotas.
    • Use bounded buffers and streaming for data handling.
    • Optimize resource usage in async tasks.
    • Monitor resource consumption and set alerts for unusual spikes.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Task Queue Saturation [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Overwhelming Tokio's task scheduler by spawning an excessive number of tasks.
  • Likelihood: High - Easy to trigger if task creation is unbounded.
  • Impact: Significant - Application slowdown or outage.
  • Effort: Minimal - Simple requests can trigger task creation.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of application endpoints.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Monitor task queue length and task creation rates.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement rate limiting on task creation, especially from external inputs.
    • Use task prioritization to ensure critical tasks are processed.
    • Validate and sanitize inputs to prevent malicious task creation triggers.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Spawn Excessive Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The specific attack vector for Task Queue Saturation - exploiting API endpoints to trigger unbounded task creation.
  • Likelihood: High - If API endpoints are not properly protected.
  • Impact: Significant - Application slowdown or outage due to task queue saturation.
  • Effort: Minimal - Sending requests to vulnerable API endpoints.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Identifying and exploiting API endpoints.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Monitor task creation rates and API endpoint usage.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement rate limiting on API endpoints that trigger task creation.
    • Validate and sanitize inputs to API endpoints.
    • Set limits on the number of tasks spawned per request or user.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Memory Exhaustion [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Depleting application memory, leading to slowdowns or crashes.
  • Likelihood: High - Memory leaks and excessive buffer allocation are common issues.
  • Impact: Significant - Application slowdown, potential crash, DoS.
  • Effort: Low to Minimal - Exploiting existing leaks or sending large payloads.
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate - Depending on the specific memory exhaustion vector.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Requires memory monitoring and profiling.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement memory profiling and leak detection.
    • Use bounded buffers and streaming for large data handling.
    • Set memory limits for the application.
    • Carefully manage lifetimes in async tasks to prevent leaks.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Memory Leaks in Async Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Memory Exhaustion - triggering tasks that unintentionally hold onto memory due to async lifetimes or cycles.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Common programming error in complex async code.
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant - Application slowdown, potential crash over time.
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting existing memory leaks.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate - Understanding async memory management and lifetimes.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Requires memory profiling and leak detection tools.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thoroughly review and test async code for memory leaks.
    • Use memory profiling tools regularly.
    • Pay close attention to lifetimes and resource management in async tasks.

Attack Tree Path: 8. Excessive Buffer Allocation [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Memory Exhaustion - sending large data payloads to force Tokio to allocate large buffers.
  • Likelihood: High - Easy to send large payloads in network requests.
  • Impact: Significant - Immediate memory exhaustion and DoS.
  • Effort: Minimal - Sending large network requests.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Basic network request manipulation.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Monitor network traffic and memory usage.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement limits on request and response sizes.
    • Use bounded buffers for network operations.
    • Validate and sanitize input data sizes.

Attack Tree Path: 9. Thread Pool Exhaustion (Tokio Runtime) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Starving Tokio's runtime thread pool by blocking runtime threads.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Common mistake for developers new to async programming.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - Application slowdown or complete DoS.
  • Effort: Low - Simple requests can trigger blocking operations if code is not written correctly.
  • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate - Understanding of async vs. sync operations.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Monitor runtime thread pool utilization and performance.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strictly avoid blocking operations in Tokio tasks.
    • Use tokio::task::spawn_blocking for necessary blocking operations.
    • Educate developers on async programming best practices.

Attack Tree Path: 10. Block Tokio Runtime Threads [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: The specific attack vector for Thread Pool Exhaustion - submitting long-blocking synchronous operations directly to the Tokio runtime.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on code quality and developer awareness.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - Application slowdown or DoS due to thread pool starvation.
  • Effort: Low - Triggering code paths with blocking operations.
  • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate - Identifying code paths with blocking operations.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Performance monitoring, thread pool utilization analysis.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Code reviews to identify and eliminate blocking operations in tasks.
    • Static analysis tools to detect potential blocking calls.
    • Thorough testing of application under load to identify performance bottlenecks.

Attack Tree Path: 11. Network Resource Exhaustion (If application uses Tokio's networking) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Classic network DoS attacks targeting connection limits, bandwidth, or processing capacity.
  • Likelihood: High - Network DoS attacks are a well-known threat.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - Application outage, network congestion.
  • Effort: Minimal to Medium - Depending on the specific network DoS vector.
  • Skill Level: Novice to Intermediate - Depending on the specific network DoS vector.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Network monitoring tools can easily detect network DoS attacks.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement connection limits and timeouts.
    • Use network-level rate limiting and firewalls.
    • Employ DoS protection mechanisms (SYN cookies, traffic shaping).
    • Monitor network traffic and bandwidth usage.

Attack Tree Path: 12. Connection Flooding [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Network Resource Exhaustion - opening a large number of connections to exhaust server connection limits.
  • Likelihood: High - Easy to execute with readily available tools.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - DoS due to connection exhaustion.
  • Effort: Minimal - Using simple network tools.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Basic network knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Monitor connection counts and network traffic.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Configure connection limits at application and OS/firewall levels.
    • Implement connection timeouts.
    • Use SYN cookies and connection rate limiting.

Attack Tree Path: 13. Slowloris/Slow HTTP Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Network Resource Exhaustion - sending slow requests to keep connections open and exhaust server resources.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Still effective against some servers if not properly configured.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - DoS due to resource exhaustion from long-lasting connections.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Requires specialized tools, but readily available.
  • Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate - Understanding of HTTP and network protocols.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Network traffic analysis, connection monitoring for slow connections.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement timeouts for request headers and bodies.
    • Limit connection duration.
    • Use reverse proxies or load balancers with Slowloris protection.

Attack Tree Path: 14. Data Flooding [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Network Resource Exhaustion - sending large amounts of data to overwhelm network bandwidth or processing capacity.
  • Likelihood: High - Easy to send large data payloads.
  • Impact: Significant to Critical - DoS due to bandwidth exhaustion or processing overload.
  • Effort: Minimal - Using simple network tools to send large data.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Basic network knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy - Monitor network traffic and bandwidth usage.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement limits on request and response sizes.
    • Use rate limiting for data transfer.
    • Employ network traffic filtering and shaping.

Attack Tree Path: 15. Tokio Runtime Panics/Crashes [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Causing the Tokio runtime to panic and potentially crash the application.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Programming errors and unexpected inputs can lead to panics.
  • Impact: Significant - Application crash, DoS.
  • Effort: Medium - Triggering specific code paths that lead to panics.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate - Understanding application logic and error handling.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium - Crash logs and runtime monitoring will indicate panics.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust error handling in async tasks using Result and ?.
    • Use catch_unwind in critical tasks (with caution).
    • Log all errors and panics for debugging and monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: 16. Unhandled Panics in Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Tokio Runtime Panics/Crashes - triggering code paths in async tasks that lead to unhandled panic!.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Depends on code quality and error handling practices.
  • Impact: Significant - Runtime crash, DoS.
  • Effort: Medium - Triggering specific code paths with unexpected inputs or conditions.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate - Understanding application logic and potential panic points.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium - Crash logs and runtime monitoring will show unhandled panics.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Comprehensive error handling in all async tasks.
    • Thorough testing to identify potential panic scenarios.
    • Use catch_unwind for critical tasks as a last resort.

Attack Tree Path: 17. Bugs in Tokio Itself [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Tokio library itself.
  • Likelihood: Very Low - Tokio is well-maintained and audited.
  • Impact: Critical - Potentially complete compromise, depending on the vulnerability.
  • Effort: Very High - Requires deep reverse engineering and vulnerability research.
  • Skill Level: Expert - Security researcher, exploit developer.
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard - Might initially appear as application instability.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Tokio and dependencies updated to the latest versions.
    • For critical applications, consider security audits of Tokio usage.
    • Report any potential vulnerabilities to the Tokio project maintainers.

Attack Tree Path: 18. Integrity Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Corrupting application data or logic, leading to incorrect behavior or unauthorized actions.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Race conditions and logic errors are possible in concurrent async code.
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant - Data corruption, application malfunction, incorrect behavior.
  • Effort: Medium to High - Exploiting race conditions and logic errors can be complex.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced - Understanding of concurrency and async programming.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Requires specific concurrency testing and may be intermittent.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize shared mutable state between tasks.
    • Use synchronization primitives correctly (Mutex, RwLock, channels).
    • Implement thorough concurrency testing.
    • Conduct code reviews focused on concurrency safety.

Attack Tree Path: 19. Race Conditions in Async Code [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Data corruption or logic errors due to concurrent access to shared mutable state in async tasks without proper synchronization.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High - Common concurrency issue, especially in complex async applications.
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant - Data corruption, application malfunction, unpredictable behavior.
  • Effort: Medium - Exploiting race conditions can be tricky and timing-dependent.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced - Understanding of concurrency, race conditions, and synchronization.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Requires specialized concurrency testing tools and techniques.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize shared mutable state.
    • Use appropriate synchronization primitives (Mutex, RwLock, channels).
    • Thorough concurrency testing using tools like loom.
    • Code reviews focused on concurrency and data sharing.

Attack Tree Path: 20. Data Corruption due to Shared Mutable State [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Race Conditions in Async Code - exploiting race conditions to corrupt shared data.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High - Depends on the amount of shared mutable state and concurrency complexity.
  • Impact: Moderate to Significant - Data corruption, application malfunction, incorrect data processing.
  • Effort: Medium - Identifying and exploiting race conditions in data access.
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced - Understanding of data structures, concurrency, and race conditions.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Race conditions can be intermittent and difficult to reproduce.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize shared mutable state.
    • Protect shared mutable data with appropriate synchronization primitives.
    • Use immutable data structures where possible.
    • Thoroughly test concurrent data access patterns.

Attack Tree Path: 21. Confidentiality Breach [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Information leaks through error handling are common.
  • Impact: Minor to Significant - Depending on the sensitivity of the leaked information.
  • Effort: Minimal to High - Depending on the specific confidentiality breach vector.
  • Skill Level: Novice to Expert - Depending on the specific confidentiality breach vector.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Very Hard - Depending on the type of confidentiality breach.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Sanitize error messages and logs to prevent information leaks.
    • Implement secure coding practices to avoid timing attacks.
    • Use encryption and access control to protect sensitive data.

Attack Tree Path: 22. Information Leaks through Error Handling [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Description: Exposing sensitive information in error messages or logs.
  • Likelihood: High - Common programming mistake to include verbose error details.
  • Impact: Minor to Moderate - Information disclosure, potential for further attacks.
  • Effort: Minimal - Triggering errors is often easy.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of error handling.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium - Log analysis and error message inspection.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Sanitize error messages before logging or displaying them.
    • Use structured logging to separate error codes from sensitive context data.
    • Implement different error handling strategies for development and production environments.

Attack Tree Path: 23. Verbose Error Messages Exposing Internal State [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Description: A specific attack vector for Information Leaks through Error Handling - error messages revealing internal details like file paths, database credentials, or internal data structures.
  • Likelihood: High - Common programming practice to include detailed error information for debugging.
  • Impact: Minor to Moderate - Information disclosure, potentially aiding further attacks.
  • Effort: Minimal - Triggering errors through invalid input or unexpected conditions.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Basic understanding of error handling and application inputs.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Medium - Reviewing logs and error responses.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Sanitize error messages to remove sensitive information.
    • Log detailed error information only in secure, internal logs.
    • Display generic error messages to users in production.