Mitigation Strategy: Task Budgeting/Limiting (using tokio::sync::Semaphore
)
Mitigation Strategy: Task Budgeting/Limiting using tokio::sync::Semaphore
.
-
Description:
- Identify Critical Resources: Determine which resources (e.g., concurrent database connections, external API calls, CPU-intensive tasks managed by Tokio) need to be limited.
- Create a Semaphore: Instantiate a
tokio::sync::Semaphore
with a specific number of permits, representing the maximum allowed concurrent access to the resource. Example:let db_semaphore = Arc::new(Semaphore::new(10));
(allows 10 concurrent database connections). - Acquire Permits Before Resource Access: Before any code that accesses the limited resource within a Tokio task, asynchronously acquire a permit from the semaphore using
db_semaphore.clone().acquire().await?;
. This will block (asynchronously, within the Tokio runtime) if all permits are currently in use. - Release Permits After Resource Access: Crucially, ensure that the permit is released after the resource is no longer needed, even if an error occurs. Use a
defer
orfinally
block (if available) or aDrop
implementation (as shown in the previous response) to guarantee release. - Handle Permit Acquisition Errors: The
acquire().await?
call can return an error. Handle this error appropriately. - Consider
try_acquire()
: For non-critical operations, usetry_acquire()
to attempt to acquire a permit without blocking within the Tokio runtime.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Resource Exhaustion (DoS): (Severity: High) - Prevents an attacker from overwhelming the system by spawning excessive Tokio tasks that consume a specific resource.
- Uncontrolled Task Spawning: (Severity: Medium) - Limits the overall number of concurrent Tokio tasks.
-
Impact:
- Resource Exhaustion (DoS): Risk significantly reduced.
- Uncontrolled Task Spawning: Risk reduced.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Example: Database connection pooling (in
src/db/mod.rs
). - Example: External API rate limiting (in
src/external_api.rs
).
- Example: Database connection pooling (in
-
Missing Implementation:
- CPU-intensive task limiting (missing in
src/image_processing.rs
). - Global task limit (missing).
- CPU-intensive task limiting (missing in
Mitigation Strategy: Timeout Handling (using tokio::time::timeout
)
Mitigation Strategy: Universal Timeout Application with tokio::time::timeout
.
-
Description:
- Identify Asynchronous Operations: Identify all asynchronous operations managed by Tokio, including network I/O, database queries, external API calls, and custom futures.
- Wrap with
tokio::time::timeout
: Wrap each asynchronous operation withtokio::time::timeout
. See the previous response for a detailed code example. - Choose Appropriate Timeout Values: Carefully select timeout durations.
- Handle Timeout Errors: Handle both timeout errors (
Err(Elapsed)
) and inner operation errors (Ok(Err(e))
) appropriately. - Apply to All Futures: This is critical. Apply timeouts universally to all Tokio-managed futures.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Resource Exhaustion (DoS): (Severity: High) - Prevents slow or stalled Tokio-managed operations from indefinitely consuming resources.
- Hanging Operations: (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Resource Exhaustion (DoS): Risk dramatically reduced.
- Hanging Operations: Risk significantly reduced.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Network I/O timeouts (in
src/network/client.rs
andsrc/network/server.rs
). - Database query timeouts (in
src/db/mod.rs
).
- Network I/O timeouts (in
-
Missing Implementation:
- External API call timeouts (partially missing in
src/external_api.rs
). - Long-running computations spawned with
spawn_blocking
(missing insrc/long_running_task.rs
).
- External API call timeouts (partially missing in
Mitigation Strategy: Backpressure Handling (using tokio::sync::mpsc
)
Mitigation Strategy: Backpressure with Bounded Channels (tokio::sync::mpsc
).
-
Description:
- Identify Data Streams: Identify parts of the application that process streams of data within the Tokio runtime.
- Use Bounded Channels: Use
tokio::sync::mpsc::channel(capacity)
to create bounded channels for communication between different Tokio tasks. - Sender-Side Handling: When sending data to the channel, use
send().await
. If the channel is full, this will block (asynchronously, within the Tokio runtime) until space becomes available. - Receiver-Side Handling: The receiver processes messages from the channel.
- Monitor Channel Capacity: Optionally, monitor the channel's capacity.
- Consider
try_send()
: In some cases, usetry_send()
to attempt to send a message without blocking within the Tokio runtime.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Resource Exhaustion (DoS): (Severity: Medium)
- Memory Leaks: (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Resource Exhaustion (DoS): Risk reduced.
- Memory Leaks: Risk reduced.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Message queue processing (in
src/message_queue.rs
).
- Message queue processing (in
-
Missing Implementation:
- Incoming network request handling (missing in
src/network/server.rs
).
- Incoming network request handling (missing in
Mitigation Strategy: Safe Shared State Management (using tokio::sync
)
Mitigation Strategy: Using tokio::sync::Mutex
(and other tokio::sync
primitives) for Shared Mutable State.
-
Description:
- Identify Shared Mutable State: Identify data accessed and modified by multiple Tokio tasks.
- Wrap with
Arc<tokio::sync::Mutex<T>>
: Wrap the shared data. - Acquire Lock Asynchronously: Before accessing, use
mutex.lock().await
. - Release Lock After Access: The lock guard automatically releases the lock when it goes out of scope.
- Minimize Lock Contention: Keep the critical section short.
- Avoid Holding Locks Across
await
Points (Generally): Avoid this pattern to prevent deadlocks within the Tokio runtime. - Use other
tokio::sync
primitives when appropriate: Usetokio::sync::RwLock
,tokio::sync::watch
,tokio::sync::broadcast
,tokio::sync::oneshot
as needed.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Data Races: (Severity: High)
- Race Conditions: (Severity: High)
-
Impact:
- Data Races: Risk eliminated.
- Race Conditions: Risk significantly reduced.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Shared application configuration (in
src/config.rs
). - Shared counter for tracking active connections (in
src/network/server.rs
).
- Shared application configuration (in
-
Missing Implementation:
- Shared cache (partially missing in
src/cache.rs
).
- Shared cache (partially missing in
Mitigation Strategy: Panic Handling in Tasks (using tokio::task::JoinHandle
)
Mitigation Strategy: Using tokio::task::JoinHandle
for Panic Propagation.
-
Description:
- Spawn Tasks with
tokio::task::spawn
: Usetokio::task::spawn
to create new asynchronous tasks. - Retain the
JoinHandle
: Store theJoinHandle
. await
theJoinHandle
:await
theJoinHandle
to wait for the task to complete.- Handle the
Result
: Handle theOk(_)
andErr(JoinError)
cases, checking for panics usingJoinError::is_panic()
. - Log and/or Recover: Log panics and potentially attempt recovery.
- Spawn Tasks with
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Unhandled Panics: (Severity: Medium)
- Resource Leaks: (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Unhandled Panics: Risk significantly reduced.
- Resource Leaks: Risk reduced.
-
Currently Implemented:
- All major task spawning points.
-
Missing Implementation:
- No missing implementation.
Mitigation Strategy: Controlled spawn_blocking
Usage (with tokio::task::spawn_blocking
and potentially tokio::sync::Semaphore
)
Mitigation Strategy: Limiting and Monitoring spawn_blocking
.
-
Description:
- Identify Blocking Operations: Identify truly blocking operations.
- Use
tokio::task::spawn_blocking
: Usespawn_blocking
to offload these to a separate thread pool. - Configure Thread Pool Size: Configure the Tokio runtime's blocking thread pool size appropriately.
- Consider a Semaphore: Use a
tokio::sync::Semaphore
to limit concurrently runningspawn_blocking
tasks. - Short-Lived Tasks: Design blocking tasks to be short-lived.
- Timeouts (using
tokio::time::timeout
): Apply timeouts to the futures returned byspawn_blocking
.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Tokio Runtime Starvation: (Severity: Medium)
- Resource Exhaustion (Threads): (Severity: Medium)
-
Impact:
- Tokio Runtime Starvation: Risk significantly reduced.
- Resource Exhaustion (Threads): Risk reduced.
-
Currently Implemented:
- File I/O operations (in
src/file_io.rs
). - CPU-bound cryptographic operations (in
src/crypto.rs
).
- File I/O operations (in
-
Missing Implementation:
- Long-running computations (partially missing in
src/long_running_task.rs
).
- Long-running computations (partially missing in