Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (65 loc) · 7.88 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (65 loc) · 7.88 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for vercel/turborepo

Attack Surface: Compromised Remote Cache Server

  • Description: A malicious actor gains control of the remote cache server used by Turborepo.
  • Turborepo Contribution: Turborepo's core functionality relies on remote caching to speed up builds, creating a dependency on external infrastructure.
  • Example: An attacker compromises a self-hosted remote cache server and injects backdoors into cached build artifacts for commonly used internal libraries. Developers using Turborepo unknowingly pull these compromised artifacts, integrating malware into their projects.
  • Impact: Supply chain attack, widespread malware distribution, compromise of developer and production environments.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Remote Cache Infrastructure: Implement strong access controls, regular security audits, and intrusion detection for remote cache servers.
    • Use HTTPS and Strong TLS: Enforce HTTPS with strong TLS configurations for all communication with the remote cache.
    • Implement Content Integrity Checks: Utilize cryptographic hashing to verify the integrity of cached artifacts before use.
    • Regular Security Monitoring: Continuously monitor the remote cache infrastructure for suspicious activity.

Attack Surface: Insecure Communication with Remote Cache

  • Description: Communication between Turborepo clients and the remote cache server is not properly secured, enabling Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks.
  • Turborepo Contribution: Turborepo's remote caching feature necessitates network communication, creating a vulnerability if not properly secured.
  • Example: A developer on a public Wi-Fi network uses Turborepo. An attacker performs a MITM attack, intercepts communication, and injects malicious cached artifacts during transit, compromising the developer's build process.
  • Impact: Supply chain attack, malicious code injection, potential compromise of developer machines.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enforce HTTPS for Remote Cache Communication: Always use HTTPS for remote cache communication and ensure Turborepo configuration enforces it.
    • Use Strong TLS Configurations: Configure both client and server for strong TLS versions and cipher suites.
    • Utilize VPNs for Untrusted Networks: Developers should use VPNs on untrusted networks to encrypt traffic and secure remote cache communication.

Attack Surface: Insufficient Access Controls on Remote Cache

  • Description: Weak access controls on the remote cache server allow unauthorized users to read or write cached artifacts.
  • Turborepo Contribution: Turborepo's remote cache requires access control to restrict interaction to authorized users and systems.
  • Example: A self-hosted remote cache server uses default credentials. An attacker gains access, reads sensitive cached artifacts (potentially code or secrets), or injects malicious artifacts.
  • Impact: Data leakage, unauthorized access to sensitive information, supply chain attack via malicious artifact injection.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Robust Authentication and Authorization: Enforce strong authentication (e.g., API keys, OAuth 2.0) and role-based access control (RBAC) for the remote cache.
    • Regularly Review and Audit Access Controls: Periodically review and audit access control configurations.
    • Secure Credential Management: Properly manage and rotate credentials for remote cache access, avoiding hardcoding.

Attack Surface: Command Injection Vulnerabilities in Task Definitions

  • Description: Task definitions in turbo.json or scripts executed by Turborepo are vulnerable to command injection due to insecure handling of dynamic inputs.
  • Turborepo Contribution: Turborepo uses turbo.json to define tasks involving shell command execution. Unsafe dynamic command construction introduces injection risks.
  • Example: A turbo.json task uses an unsanitized environment variable to construct a shell command. An attacker manipulates this variable to inject arbitrary commands executed by Turborepo during the build.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the build environment, compromise of build server and application artifacts.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Sanitization and Validation: Sanitize and validate all dynamic inputs used in task definitions and scripts before shell command execution.
    • Avoid Dynamic Command Construction: Minimize dynamic command construction. Use parameterized commands or safer alternatives to shell execution.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Script Execution: Run scripts with minimal necessary privileges.
    • Code Reviews for Task Definitions: Conduct security-focused code reviews of turbo.json and related scripts.

Attack Surface: Exposure of Secrets in turbo.json or Configuration Files

  • Description: Sensitive information (API keys, credentials) is exposed by being directly embedded in turbo.json or other Turborepo configuration files.
  • Turborepo Contribution: Turborepo uses configuration files like turbo.json, which can inadvertently become repositories for secrets if not managed carefully.
  • Example: Developers hardcode API keys in turbo.json or environment variable configuration files, which are then committed to version control, potentially exposing secrets publicly.
  • Impact: Data breach, unauthorized access to protected services, financial loss, reputational damage.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Utilize Environment Variables: Store secrets as environment variables instead of hardcoding them in configuration files.
    • Implement Secret Management Tools: Use dedicated secret management tools (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) for secure secret storage and access.
    • Avoid Committing Secrets to Version Control: Never commit secrets to version control. Use .gitignore to exclude files containing secrets.
    • Regularly Scan for Exposed Secrets: Implement automated scanning for accidentally committed secrets and revoke/rotate them if found.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in Turborepo Core or Dependencies

  • Description: Security vulnerabilities are discovered in the Turborepo core codebase or its dependencies.
  • Turborepo Contribution: Like any software, Turborepo is susceptible to vulnerabilities in its code or third-party libraries.
  • Example: A vulnerability in a dependency used by Turborepo for configuration parsing is exploited via a malicious turbo.json file, leading to Remote Code Execution.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Remote Code Execution (RCE), build process compromise, potential supply chain implications.
  • Risk Severity: High (can be Critical depending on the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Turborepo and Dependencies Updated: Regularly update Turborepo and its dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Subscribe to security advisories for Turborepo and its ecosystem.
    • Perform Security Audits: Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing of Turborepo projects.
    • Use Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST): Integrate SAST tools into the development pipeline for automated vulnerability scanning.