Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
159 lines (126 loc) · 12.8 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

159 lines (126 loc) · 12.8 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for vercel/turborepo

Objective: Compromise application using Turborepo by exploiting Turborepo-specific weaknesses.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Turborepo

└─── [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Exploit Turborepo Configuration Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH START]
    └─── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.1. Malicious `turbo.json` Modification [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.1. Direct Modification (e.g., compromised developer account, insider threat) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └─── 1.2.1. Cache Poisoning via Incorrect Hashing/Invalidation [HIGH-RISK PATH START]
└─── [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Exploit Turborepo Caching Mechanisms
    └─── [CRITICAL NODE] 2.2. Remote Cache Exploitation (If Enabled)
        └─── [CRITICAL NODE] 2.2.1.1. Compromise Remote Cache Server [CRITICAL NODE]
└─── [CRITICAL NODE] 3. Exploit Task Orchestration and Scripting Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH START]
    └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1. Command Injection in Build Scripts (within packages) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.1. Unsanitized Inputs from Environment Variables, CLI Arguments, or Package Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]
└─── 4. Exploit Developer Workflow and Tooling Related to Turborepo
    └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH START] 4.1. Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Dependencies (Indirectly related to Turborepo) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
        └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.1.1. Compromise External Dependencies Used by Turborepo or Packages [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    └─── [CRITICAL NODE] 4.2. Social Engineering Developers to Introduce Malicious Config/Scripts [HIGH-RISK PATH START]
        └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 4.2.1. Phishing, Insider Threat, or Compromised Developer Accounts [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Critical Node: Exploit Turborepo Configuration Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Turborepo configuration, primarily managed through turbo.json, dictates the entire build process.
    • Vulnerabilities here allow attackers to manipulate build steps, caching behavior, and security measures.
    • Exploiting configuration vulnerabilities can have a wide-ranging impact, affecting the integrity and security of the entire application.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Critical Node: Malicious turbo.json Modification

  • Attack Vectors:
    • turbo.json is the central configuration file for Turborepo.
    • Malicious modification can directly inject malicious scripts, alter build commands, or disable security-related tasks.
    • This node is critical because it represents direct control over the build pipeline through configuration manipulation.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1. High-Risk Path: Direct Modification (e.g., compromised developer account, insider threat)

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Compromised Developer Account: An attacker gains access to a developer's account with repository write permissions.
    • Insider Threat: A malicious insider with legitimate access to the repository.
    • Direct Repository Access: Exploiting vulnerabilities in repository access controls or infrastructure.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • Low Effort: Once access is gained, modifying turbo.json is straightforward.
    • Low Skill Level: Requires basic file editing skills.
    • Critical Impact: Allows for complete control over the build process, leading to code injection, backdoor installation, or disabling security features.
    • Medium Detection Difficulty: Changes can be subtle and might be missed without proper code review and change monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1. High-Risk Path Start: Cache Poisoning via Incorrect Hashing/Invalidation

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Incorrect Cache Key Definition: Cache keys in turbo.json are not properly defined to include all relevant inputs.
    • Flawed Invalidation Logic: Cache invalidation rules are insufficient or incorrectly implemented.
    • Input Manipulation: Attacker manipulates input files (code, configuration, dependencies) to influence the cache key while injecting malicious output.
  • Why High-Risk Start:
    • Medium Likelihood: Misconfigurations in caching are common, especially in complex build setups.
    • Moderate Impact: Can lead to serving outdated or malicious cached artifacts, potentially bypassing security checks.
    • Medium Effort: Requires understanding of caching mechanisms and how to manipulate inputs.
    • Medium Skill Level: Requires some understanding of build processes and caching.
    • Medium Detection Difficulty: Can be detected through build output discrepancies or unexpected behavior, but requires careful analysis.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Critical Node: Exploit Turborepo Caching Mechanisms

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Turborepo's caching is a core feature for performance. Exploiting caching mechanisms can lead to serving malicious or outdated artifacts.
    • Vulnerabilities in local or remote caching can have significant consequences, affecting build integrity and application security.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2. Critical Node: Remote Cache Exploitation (If Enabled)

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Remote cache introduces a shared attack surface, impacting multiple projects and users.
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the remote cache infrastructure, authentication, or communication can have widespread consequences.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.1.1. Critical Node: Compromise Remote Cache Server

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Server Vulnerabilities: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the remote cache server operating system, software, or configurations.
    • Weak Access Controls: Insufficient access controls allowing unauthorized access to the server.
    • Network Exploitation: Exploiting network vulnerabilities to gain access to the server.
  • Why Critical:
    • Critical Impact: Complete compromise of the remote cache server allows for poisoning the cache for all users and projects.
    • Very Low Likelihood (for well-secured servers): Compromising a server is generally difficult if properly secured.
    • High Effort: Requires significant effort and resources to compromise a server.
    • High Skill Level: Requires advanced server exploitation skills.
    • Hard Detection Difficulty: Depends on the security monitoring of the remote cache server itself.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Critical Node: Exploit Task Orchestration and Scripting Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Turborepo orchestrates tasks and executes build scripts within packages.
    • Vulnerabilities in task orchestration or scripting can lead to command injection and arbitrary code execution on build systems.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1. High-Risk Path: Command Injection in Build Scripts (within packages)

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Unsanitized Inputs in Scripts: Build scripts within packages use unsanitized inputs from environment variables, CLI arguments, or package dependencies.
    • Shell Execution: Build scripts use shell execution in a way that is vulnerable to command injection.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • Medium Likelihood: Command injection vulnerabilities are common in scripting, especially when handling external inputs.
    • Significant Impact: Can lead to arbitrary command execution on build agents or developer machines.
    • Medium Effort: Requires identifying vulnerable scripts and crafting malicious inputs.
    • Medium Skill Level: Requires understanding of command injection and scripting.
    • Medium Detection Difficulty: Can be detected through static analysis or runtime monitoring, but might be missed if inputs are complex.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1. High-Risk Path: Unsanitized Inputs from Environment Variables, CLI Arguments, or Package Dependencies

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Environment Variables: Build scripts directly use environment variables without sanitization.
    • CLI Arguments: Build scripts process command-line arguments without proper validation.
    • Package Dependencies: Build scripts use data from package dependencies that might be maliciously crafted.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • This is the specific mechanism that enables command injection in build scripts.
    • Unsanitized inputs are a common source of vulnerabilities in scripting languages.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1. High-Risk Path Start: Supply Chain Attacks via Compromised Dependencies (Indirectly related to Turborepo)

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Compromised External Dependencies: Attackers compromise external dependencies used by packages within the monorepo.
    • Dependency Confusion/Substitution (External): Attackers create malicious public packages with names similar to internal or popular packages.
  • Why High-Risk Start:
    • Medium Likelihood: Supply chain attacks are increasingly common and effective.
    • Significant Impact: Can introduce vulnerabilities across the application through compromised libraries.
    • Medium Effort: Compromising a dependency requires some effort, but there are known techniques.
    • Medium Skill Level: Requires understanding of dependency management and supply chain attack vectors.
    • Hard Detection Difficulty: Can be difficult to detect until the vulnerability is exploited or discovered through thorough dependency scanning.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1.1. High-Risk Path: Compromise External Dependencies Used by Turborepo or Packages

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Direct Dependency Compromise: Attackers directly compromise a popular or widely used external dependency repository or package.
    • Typosquatting: Attackers create malicious packages with names similar to legitimate dependencies (typosquatting).
    • Account Takeover: Attackers compromise maintainer accounts of legitimate packages and publish malicious updates.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • This is the direct mechanism of supply chain attacks.
    • External dependencies are often implicitly trusted, making them a valuable target for attackers.

Attack Tree Path: 4.2. Critical Node: Social Engineering Developers to Introduce Malicious Config/Scripts

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Developers are targeted to introduce malicious code or configuration directly into the Turborepo project.
    • Social engineering attacks exploit human trust and vulnerabilities to bypass technical security controls.

Attack Tree Path: 4.2.1. High-Risk Path: Phishing, Insider Threat, or Compromised Developer Accounts

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Phishing: Attackers use phishing emails or websites to trick developers into revealing credentials or installing malicious software.
    • Insider Threat: A malicious insider intentionally introduces malicious code or configuration.
    • Compromised Developer Accounts: Attackers gain access to developer accounts through credential theft or account takeover.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • Critical Impact: Direct injection of malicious code or configuration can lead to complete compromise.
    • Low Likelihood (for targeted attacks, but phishing is common): Targeted social engineering can be less frequent, but phishing attempts are widespread.
    • Low Effort: Social engineering attacks can be relatively low effort compared to technical exploits.
    • Low Skill Level: Basic social engineering techniques can be effective.
    • Medium Detection Difficulty: Detecting social engineering attacks can be challenging, relying on user awareness and anomaly detection.