Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
146 lines (103 loc) · 21.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

146 lines (103 loc) · 21.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for yewstack/yew

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize JavaScript Interop

  • Description:

    1. Analyze Yew component needs: Within your Yew components, carefully evaluate each instance where you use wasm-bindgen to interact with JavaScript. Determine if the functionality can be implemented directly in Rust/WASM within the Yew component's logic.
    2. Prioritize Rust/Yew implementations: Whenever feasible within your Yew application, rewrite JavaScript logic in Rust and compile it to WASM. Leverage Rust's ecosystem and WASM's capabilities to handle tasks directly within your Yew components, reducing reliance on JavaScript calls.
    3. Refactor existing Yew JS interop: Gradually refactor existing JavaScript interop code within your Yew components to minimize the interaction surface. Break down complex JS interactions into smaller, more manageable, and potentially replaceable Rust/WASM components within Yew.
    4. Document Yew JS interop points: Clearly document all remaining JavaScript interop points within your Yew components. This helps in understanding the security boundaries and focusing security efforts specifically within the Yew application's JS bridge.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • JavaScript Injection/Manipulation (Medium to High Severity): Excessive reliance on JavaScript interop in Yew components increases the attack surface. Vulnerabilities in external JavaScript code or the browser's JS environment can be exploited to manipulate the Yew/WASM application or inject malicious code through the JS bridge.
      • Data Integrity Issues at JS Boundary (Medium Severity): Complex data exchange between JavaScript and Yew/WASM components increases the risk of data corruption, type mismatches, or unexpected behavior when passing data through wasm-bindgen, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities within the Yew application.

    • Impact:

      • JavaScript Injection/Manipulation: Moderately to Significantly reduces the risk by limiting the attack surface exposed through JavaScript interop within Yew components.
      • Data Integrity Issues at JS Boundary: Moderately reduces the risk by simplifying data exchange and reducing the complexity of the JS/WASM interface specifically within the Yew application's architecture.

    • Currently Implemented: Often partially implemented by default in Yew applications, as developers might naturally prefer Rust for core component logic. However, conscious effort to minimize interop within Yew component design is often missing.

    • Missing Implementation: Proactive analysis and refactoring of Yew components to reduce existing JS interop. Establishing a clear policy to minimize JS interop for new Yew features and components.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Data Validation at the JS/WASM Boundary

  • Description:

    1. Define clear data contracts for Yew interop: Establish explicit data types and formats for all data exchanged between JavaScript and Yew/WASM components using wasm-bindgen. Ensure these contracts are clearly defined in your Yew component's interface with JavaScript.
    2. Validate inputs in Yew/Rust components: Implement robust input validation routines within your Yew components in Rust for all data received from JavaScript via wasm-bindgen. Use Rust's type system, pattern matching, and validation libraries within your Yew component logic to ensure data conforms to expected formats and constraints.
    3. Sanitize inputs in Yew/Rust components: Sanitize data received from JavaScript within your Yew components to prevent injection attacks. Escape or encode data as needed based on its intended use within the Yew component's rendering or logic.
    4. Validate outputs from Yew/Rust (optional but recommended): Consider validating data being sent from Yew/WASM components back to JavaScript, especially if it's sensitive or critical. This adds an extra layer of defense at the Yew application's JS boundary.
    5. Log validation failures within Yew application: Log any data validation failures within your Yew application for monitoring and debugging purposes. This can help identify potential attacks or unexpected data flows at the JS/WASM boundary of your Yew application.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via JS Interop in Yew (Medium to High Severity): If data from JavaScript is not properly validated and sanitized before being used in Yew component rendering or logic, it can lead to XSS vulnerabilities within the Yew application.
      • Injection Attacks via JS Interop in Yew (Medium Severity): Improperly validated data from JavaScript could be used to inject malicious commands or data into the Yew application's logic, specifically within the WASM components.
      • Data Corruption/Unexpected Behavior in Yew (Low to Medium Severity): Invalid data passed from JavaScript can cause unexpected behavior or crashes in the Yew application, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities or denial of service within the Yew frontend.

    • Impact:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via JS Interop in Yew: Significantly reduces the risk by preventing malicious JavaScript data from being processed unsafely within Yew components.
      • Injection Attacks via JS Interop in Yew: Moderately to Significantly reduces the risk by preventing malicious data from influencing Yew application logic.
      • Data Corruption/Unexpected Behavior in Yew: Moderately reduces the risk by ensuring data integrity at the JS/WASM boundary of the Yew application.

    • Currently Implemented: Often partially implemented in Yew applications, especially basic type checking through wasm-bindgen. However, comprehensive input validation and sanitization within Yew components are frequently missing.

    • Missing Implementation: Detailed input validation and sanitization routines in Rust within Yew components for all data received from JavaScript. Consistent application of validation across all JS interop points in Yew components.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure State Management Practices within Yew Components

  • Description:

    1. Minimize sensitive data in Yew component state: Avoid storing sensitive information (e.g., API keys, personal data, session tokens) directly in the Yew component state or browser's local storage/session storage accessed by Yew components unless absolutely necessary.
    2. Use secure storage mechanisms (if needed by Yew): If sensitive data must be stored client-side by Yew components, consider using browser's IndexedDB with encryption at rest (though browser-based cryptography has limitations). Avoid storing highly sensitive data in localStorage or sessionStorage in plain text accessed by Yew components.
    3. Implement proper Yew component state lifecycle management: Ensure that Yew component state is properly initialized, updated, and cleared when components are unmounted or when user sessions end. Prevent state leaks or unintended persistence of sensitive data within Yew components.
    4. Consider server-side state management for Yew applications: For highly sensitive applications built with Yew, favor server-side state management and session handling. Minimize the amount of state maintained on the client-side within Yew components.
    5. Regularly audit Yew component state management: Periodically review your Yew application's state management logic within components to identify potential vulnerabilities related to data exposure, state manipulation, or insecure storage accessed by Yew components.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Client-Side Data Exposure via Yew State (High Severity): Storing sensitive data in Yew component state or insecure storage mechanisms accessed by Yew components can lead to data breaches if the client-side environment is compromised (e.g., XSS, browser extensions, physical access).
      • State Manipulation Vulnerabilities in Yew (Medium Severity): Improper state management within Yew components can create vulnerabilities where attackers can manipulate the application's state to bypass security checks, gain unauthorized access, or cause unexpected behavior within the Yew application.

    • Impact:

      • Client-Side Data Exposure via Yew State: Significantly reduces the risk by minimizing the storage of sensitive data client-side within Yew components and using secure storage when necessary for Yew components.
      • State Manipulation Vulnerabilities in Yew: Moderately reduces the risk by implementing robust Yew component state lifecycle management and preventing unintended state modifications within Yew components.

    • Currently Implemented: Basic state management is inherent in Yew applications. However, secure state management practices within Yew components, especially regarding sensitive data and secure storage, are often not proactively implemented.

    • Missing Implementation: Conscious effort to minimize sensitive data in Yew component state. Implementation of secure storage mechanisms when client-side storage is unavoidable for Yew components. Regular audits of Yew component state management logic from a security perspective.

Mitigation Strategy: Component Isolation and Security Boundaries in Yew Architecture

  • Description:

    1. Modular Yew component design: Design Yew components to be modular, self-contained, and responsible for specific functionalities within the application. Avoid creating monolithic Yew components that handle too many responsibilities.
    2. Define clear Yew component interfaces: Establish well-defined interfaces (props and callbacks) for communication between Yew components. Limit direct access to component state from outside components within the Yew architecture.
    3. Enforce data access restrictions within Yew components: Implement data access restrictions within Yew components to control which parts of the state or functionality are accessible to other components. Use Rust's module system and visibility modifiers to enforce encapsulation within the Yew component structure.
    4. Isolate sensitive Yew components: For Yew components handling sensitive data or critical functionalities, implement extra layers of isolation and security checks. Limit their interactions with less trusted Yew components within the application.
    5. Regularly review Yew component architecture: Periodically review your Yew application's component architecture to identify potential security weaknesses arising from overly coupled Yew components or unclear security boundaries within the Yew application structure.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Privilege Escalation within Yew Client-Side Application (Medium Severity): Poor Yew component isolation can allow vulnerabilities in one component to be exploited to gain access to functionalities or data intended for other components, leading to privilege escalation within the Yew client-side application.
      • Impact Propagation from Vulnerable Yew Component (Medium Severity): If Yew components are tightly coupled, a vulnerability in one component can have a wider impact across the application, potentially affecting more functionalities and data within the Yew frontend.

    • Impact:

      • Privilege Escalation within Yew Client-Side Application: Moderately reduces the risk by limiting the potential for vulnerabilities in one Yew component to be exploited to access other parts of the Yew application.
      • Impact Propagation from Vulnerable Yew Component: Moderately reduces the risk by containing the impact of a vulnerability within a smaller, isolated Yew component.

    • Currently Implemented: Component-based architecture is a core feature of Yew, so basic component isolation is naturally present. However, consciously designing Yew components for security boundaries and enforcing data access restrictions might be less common.

    • Missing Implementation: Proactive design of Yew component architecture with security boundaries in mind. Explicit enforcement of data access restrictions between Yew components. Security-focused code reviews of Yew component interactions.

Mitigation Strategy: Thorough Code Reviews Focusing on Yew Client-Side Logic

  • Description:

    1. Dedicated security code reviews for Yew: Conduct code reviews specifically focused on security aspects of the client-side Yew application. Involve security experts or developers with Yew framework expertise and security awareness in these reviews.
    2. Focus on Yew-specific client-side vulnerabilities: Pay close attention to client-side logic flaws within Yew components, XSS vulnerabilities in Yew rendering, client-side state management issues in Yew, JavaScript interop points in Yew, and potential information leaks in the Yew client-side code.
    3. Use security checklists for Yew development: Develop and use security checklists during code reviews specifically tailored for Yew development to ensure that common client-side security vulnerabilities within Yew applications are systematically checked for.
    4. Automated static analysis for Yew (optional): Consider using static analysis tools to automatically detect potential security vulnerabilities in your Rust/Yew code, specifically looking for patterns common in Yew applications.
    5. Document Yew security review findings: Document all security review findings related to the Yew application, track remediation efforts, and ensure that identified vulnerabilities are addressed and fixed within the Yew codebase.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • All Client-Side Vulnerabilities in Yew Applications (Variable Severity): Code reviews focused on Yew logic can help identify a wide range of client-side vulnerabilities specific to Yew applications, including XSS, client-side injection, insecure state management within Yew, information leaks, and logic flaws in Yew components. The severity depends on the specific vulnerability found.

    • Impact:

      • All Client-Side Vulnerabilities in Yew Applications: Significantly reduces the risk by proactively identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in Yew code before they can be exploited in production.

    • Currently Implemented: Code reviews are generally a common practice in software development. However, dedicated security-focused code reviews, especially for client-side logic within Yew applications, might be less consistently implemented.

    • Missing Implementation: Dedicated security code reviews with a focus on client-side vulnerabilities in Yew applications. Use of security checklists tailored for Yew development. Static analysis tools configured for Yew-specific patterns. Formal documentation and tracking of Yew security review findings.

Mitigation Strategy: Context-Aware Output Sanitization in Yew Rendering

  • Description:

    1. Identify dynamic content sources in Yew components: Pinpoint all locations in your Yew components where dynamic content is rendered, especially data fetched from external sources or user inputs that are displayed using Yew's rendering mechanisms.
    2. Choose appropriate sanitization methods for Yew rendering: Select sanitization methods based on the context where the data is being rendered by Yew. For HTML content rendered by Yew, use HTML escaping. For URLs rendered by Yew, use URL encoding. For JavaScript code (avoid if possible in Yew rendering), use very strict sanitization if necessary (highly discouraged in Yew).
    3. Implement sanitization in Rust/Yew rendering logic: Utilize Rust's string manipulation capabilities and Yew's rendering mechanisms (e.g., using html! macro and appropriate escaping functions) to perform output sanitization within your Yew/WASM code during component rendering.
    4. Test Yew sanitization effectiveness: Thoroughly test your output sanitization logic within Yew components to ensure it effectively prevents XSS vulnerabilities in different rendering contexts within your Yew application.
    5. Regularly review Yew sanitization: Periodically review your output sanitization implementation in Yew components to ensure it remains effective against new XSS attack vectors and that new dynamic content rendering points in Yew are properly sanitized.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Yew Applications (High Severity): Improper output sanitization in Yew rendering is a primary cause of XSS vulnerabilities in Yew applications. Context-aware sanitization within Yew components is crucial to prevent XSS attacks.

    • Impact:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Yew Applications: Significantly reduces the risk by preventing malicious scripts from being injected into the HTML output rendered by Yew components.

    • Currently Implemented: Often partially implemented in Yew applications, especially basic HTML escaping when using the html! macro. However, context-aware sanitization and comprehensive coverage of all dynamic content rendering points within Yew components might be lacking.

    • Missing Implementation: Systematic identification of all dynamic content rendering points within Yew components. Implementation of context-aware sanitization for each point in Yew rendering. Regular testing and review of sanitization logic within Yew components.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Route Handling and Authorization within Yew Client-Side Routing (if applicable)

  • Description:

    1. Avoid client-side authorization in Yew for sensitive actions: If using client-side routing in Yew, do not rely solely on client-side route checks within Yew components for authorization to sensitive functionalities or data. Client-side authorization in Yew can be easily bypassed.
    2. Implement server-side authorization for Yew applications: Always enforce authorization checks on the server-side for all sensitive operations and data access in Yew applications. Client-side routing in Yew can be used for UI navigation but should not be the primary security mechanism.
    3. Secure Yew client-side routing logic: If client-side routing is used in Yew for navigation or conditional rendering based on user roles (for UI purposes only), ensure the routing logic itself within Yew components is not vulnerable to manipulation or bypass.
    4. Handle route parameters securely in Yew: If route parameters are used to pass data within Yew routing, validate and sanitize these parameters on both the client-side (within Yew components) and server-side to prevent injection attacks or data manipulation.
    5. Regularly review Yew routing and authorization logic: Periodically review your Yew application's routing and authorization logic, especially within Yew components handling routing, to identify potential weaknesses or bypass vulnerabilities.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Unauthorized Access via Yew Client-Side Routing (High Severity): Insecure client-side routing and authorization in Yew can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive functionalities or data if server-side authorization is not properly implemented or enforced for Yew applications.
      • Bypass of Yew Client-Side Security Checks (Medium Severity): Attackers can bypass client-side security checks within Yew routing if they are not properly implemented or if they are relied upon as the primary security mechanism in Yew applications.

    • Impact:

      • Unauthorized Access via Yew Client-Side Routing: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring that authorization is primarily handled server-side and client-side routing in Yew is not used for security enforcement.
      • Bypass of Yew Client-Side Security Checks: Moderately reduces the risk by securing client-side routing logic within Yew components and preventing manipulation of routing parameters.

    • Currently Implemented: Basic routing functionality is often used in Yew applications. However, secure route handling within Yew and the understanding that client-side routing is not a security mechanism are not always fully implemented or understood in Yew development.

    • Missing Implementation: Clear separation of client-side routing in Yew for UI navigation from server-side authorization for security in Yew applications. Emphasis on server-side authorization as the primary security control for Yew applications. Security review of Yew routing logic to prevent bypass vulnerabilities.