Attack Surface: Unencrypted Network Communication
- Description: Data transmitted between Spark components (Driver, Executors, Shuffle Service) is intercepted or modified in transit.
- Spark Contribution: Spark uses RPC and network-based shuffle, creating multiple points for network interception. This is inherent to Spark's distributed nature.
- Example: An attacker on the same network as the Spark cluster uses a packet sniffer to capture shuffle data containing sensitive customer information.
- Impact: Data breach, unauthorized data modification, denial of service.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enable TLS/SSL: Configure Spark to use TLS/SSL for all communication channels (
spark.network.crypto.enabled
,spark.ssl.*
properties). This is mandatory for secure operation. - Strong Ciphers: Use strong, up-to-date cipher suites.
- Network Segmentation: Isolate Spark components on a dedicated network segment, limiting exposure.
- Authentication: Implement authentication (e.g., SASL with
spark.authenticate
) to verify the identity of communicating components.
- Enable TLS/SSL: Configure Spark to use TLS/SSL for all communication channels (
Attack Surface: Unauthenticated/Unauthorized Access to Spark UI/REST API
- Description: Attackers gain access to the Spark UI or REST API, exposing cluster information, application details, and potentially sensitive data.
- Spark Contribution: Spark provides a web UI and REST API for monitoring and management, which can be exposed without authentication by default. This is a Spark-provided feature.
- Example: An attacker discovers the Spark UI is publicly accessible and uses it to view environment variables containing database credentials. They then use the REST API to kill running jobs.
- Impact: Information disclosure, denial of service, potential credential theft.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enable Authentication: Configure authentication for the Spark UI and REST API (
spark.ui.authentication
). This is a direct Spark configuration. - Strong Authentication: Use a robust authentication mechanism (Kerberos, LDAP, or a custom filter).
- Access Control: Restrict access to the UI and API to authorized users and networks (firewall rules, reverse proxy).
- Disable if Unnecessary: If the UI/API is not needed, disable it entirely.
- Enable Authentication: Configure authentication for the Spark UI and REST API (
Attack Surface: Malicious Code Injection (UDFs, Dependencies)
- Description: Attackers inject malicious code into the Spark cluster through user-defined functions (UDFs), custom JARs, or compromised dependencies.
- Spark Contribution: Spark's ability to execute user-provided code (UDFs) and load external libraries (JARs) creates an avenue for code injection. This is a core feature of Spark's extensibility.
- Example: An attacker submits a Spark job with a malicious UDF that executes a shell command to download and run malware on the worker nodes.
- Impact: Arbitrary code execution, system compromise, data exfiltration.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Code Review: Thoroughly review and validate all user-provided code (UDFs, transformations) that will be executed by Spark.
- Dependency Management: Use a secure dependency management system and verify the integrity of Spark dependencies.
- Vulnerability Scanning: Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
- Code Signing: Implement code signing to verify the integrity and authenticity of JARs loaded by Spark.
Attack Surface: Deserialization Vulnerabilities
- Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in Spark's serialization/deserialization process to achieve remote code execution.
- Spark Contribution: Spark relies heavily on serialization for data transfer and persistence, making it susceptible to deserialization attacks. This is fundamental to Spark's operation.
- Example: An attacker sends crafted, malicious serialized data to a Spark application that uses a vulnerable version of a serialization library. Upon deserialization, the attacker's code is executed.
- Impact: Remote code execution, system compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Keep Spark Updated: Regularly update Spark and its dependencies to the latest versions to patch known deserialization vulnerabilities. This is crucial for mitigating Spark-specific vulnerabilities.
- Avoid Untrusted Data: Do not deserialize data from untrusted sources within Spark applications.
- Safer Serialization (If Possible): If feasible, consider using more secure serialization formats (e.g., Avro, Protocol Buffers) that are less prone to deserialization vulnerabilities than Java serialization, specifically within the Spark context.
- Vulnerability Scanning: Use vulnerability scanning tools to identify libraries with known deserialization issues that are used by Spark.
Attack Surface: SQL Injection in Spark SQL
- Description: Attackers inject malicious SQL code into Spark SQL queries, leading to unauthorized data access or modification.
- Spark Contribution: Spark SQL allows users to execute SQL queries against DataFrames, creating a potential vector for SQL injection. This is a Spark-provided feature.
- Example: A web application allows users to filter data using a text input field. The application constructs a Spark SQL query by directly concatenating the user's input without sanitization. An attacker enters
' OR '1'='1
to bypass filtering and retrieve all data. - Impact: Data breach, data modification, unauthorized data access.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) whenever possible. Spark's DataFrame API provides a safer way to construct queries programmatically, avoiding direct SQL string manipulation.
- Input Validation: Sanitize and validate all user input before using it in Spark SQL queries.
- Avoid String Concatenation: Do not build Spark SQL queries by concatenating strings with user input.