Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
85 lines (73 loc) · 5.29 KB

File metadata and controls

85 lines (73 loc) · 5.29 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/spark

Objective: Exfiltrate Data, DoS, or RCE (Focus on RCE due to high impact)

Attack Tree Visualization

                                     +-----------------------------------------------------+
                                     |  Attacker's Goal: Exfiltrate Data, DoS, or RCE  |
                                     +-----------------------------------------------------+
                                                        |
                                                        |
                                      +-------------------------+
                                      |  Remote Code Execution (RCE) |
                                      +-------------------------+
                                                        |
                                                        |
                                +---------+---------+---------+---------+
                                |  8.  |  9.  | 10. | 11. |
                                +---------+---------+---------+---------+
  • [!] Critical Node
  • --> High-Risk Path
  • Description: Spark uses serialization/deserialization for data and code transfer. Attackers can inject malicious serialized data, potentially achieving RCE. Java deserialization vulnerabilities are a major concern.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Highly dependent on whether untrusted data is deserialized)
  • Impact: Very High (Complete system compromise)
  • Effort: Medium to High (Finding and exploiting a deserialization vulnerability)
  • Skill Level: Advanced to Expert (Requires expertise in exploiting deserialization flaws)
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Often needs advanced intrusion detection and code analysis)
  • Mitigation:
    • Crucially: Avoid deserializing data from untrusted sources. This is the primary defense.
    • If deserialization is unavoidable, use safe serialization libraries with whitelisting.
    • Rigorously validate data before deserialization.
    • Keep Spark and all dependencies updated to patch known vulnerabilities.
  • [!] Critical Node
  • --> High-Risk Path
  • Description: If users submit code (e.g., via notebooks or custom apps), attackers can exploit vulnerabilities in that code to gain control. Common in shared Spark environments.
  • Likelihood: High (Vulnerabilities are likely if users can submit arbitrary code)
  • Impact: Very High (Complete system compromise)
  • Effort: Medium (Depends on the specific vulnerability in the user's code)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (Depends on the vulnerability being exploited)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Requires code analysis and runtime monitoring)
  • Mitigation:
    • Crucially: Run user code in a sandboxed environment (containers, VMs) with limited privileges.
    • Implement code review processes to check for security issues before deployment.
    • Use static analysis tools to scan user code for vulnerabilities.
    • Enforce strict input validation within the user-submitted code.
  • [!] Critical Node
  • --> High-Risk Path
  • Description: Spark apps often use third-party libraries. A compromised library can be exploited for RCE.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Dependencies are a frequent attack vector)
  • Impact: Very High (Complete system compromise)
  • Effort: Medium (Exploiting a known vulnerability in a dependency)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (Exploitation of known vulnerabilities)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Vulnerability scanners can detect known compromised dependencies)
  • Mitigation:
    • Use dependency management tools (Maven, Gradle) to track dependencies.
    • Employ vulnerability scanners (Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check) to find known issues.
    • Regularly update dependencies to their latest versions to patch vulnerabilities.
    • Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track all components.
  • [!] Critical Node
  • --- (Regular Path - Low likelihood, but critical impact)
  • Description: Vulnerabilities could exist within Spark itself, although this is less common.
  • Likelihood: Low (Spark is well-vetted, but zero-days are possible)
  • Impact: Very High (Complete system compromise)
  • Effort: Very High (Requires finding a zero-day vulnerability)
  • Skill Level: Expert (Vulnerability research and exploit development)
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard (Zero-day vulnerabilities are unknown by definition)
  • Mitigation:
    • Keep Spark updated to the latest stable release.
    • Monitor Spark security advisories and mailing lists.
    • Responsibly disclose any discovered vulnerabilities to the Apache Spark security team.