Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (68 loc) · 7.49 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (68 loc) · 7.49 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for herotransitions/hero

Objective: Compromise application using Hero Transitions to execute malicious actions, potentially leading to data theft, service disruption, or unauthorized access.

Attack Tree Visualization

High-Risk Attack Paths: ├───[AND] Exploit Vulnerabilities Related to Hero Transitions ├───[OR] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Hero Library Itself │ ├───[AND] Dependency Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └───[Leaf] Exploit Outdated or Vulnerable Dependencies of Hero [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───[AND] Supply Chain Attacks [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └───[Leaf] Compromise Hero's Distribution Channel (e.g., npm, GitHub) [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR] Exploit Misuse/Misconfiguration of Hero Transitions in Application [HIGH RISK PATH] │ ├───[AND] Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Transition Data [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[Leaf] Inject Malicious Script through User-Controlled Data Used in Transitions [CRITICAL NODE] └───[AND] Client-Side Logic Manipulation related to Transitions ├───[Leaf] Tamper with Transition State or Configuration [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Outdated or Vulnerable Dependencies of Hero (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):

  • Attack Vector:
    • Hero library relies on other JavaScript packages (dependencies).
    • These dependencies may have known security vulnerabilities due to being outdated or having inherent flaws.
    • Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities if the application uses a version of Hero with vulnerable dependencies.
  • Potential Impact:
    • Compromise of the application through the vulnerable dependency. This could range from XSS, arbitrary code execution, to data breaches, depending on the specific vulnerability.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Dependency Audits: Use tools like npm audit or yarn audit to identify known vulnerabilities in Hero's dependencies.
    • Dependency Updates: Keep Hero's dependencies up-to-date with the latest secure versions.
    • Dependency Scanning in CI/CD: Integrate dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically detect vulnerabilities before deployment.
    • Use Package Lock Files: Ensure consistent dependency versions across environments using package-lock.json or yarn.lock.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Compromise Hero's Distribution Channel (e.g., npm, GitHub) (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attackers compromise the distribution channels where Hero is hosted (e.g., npm registry, GitHub repository).
    • They inject malicious code into the Hero library itself.
    • Applications downloading and using the compromised Hero library will unknowingly include the malicious code.
  • Potential Impact:
    • Critical and widespread compromise of all applications using the malicious version of Hero.
    • Attackers gain control over client-side execution within affected applications, enabling data theft, account takeover, and other malicious actions at scale.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Integrity Verification: Verify the integrity of the Hero library downloaded from npm or GitHub using checksums or signatures if available.
    • Package Lock Files: Use package lock files to ensure consistent versions and reduce the risk of unexpected changes in dependencies.
    • Source Code Review (Optional): For highly sensitive applications, consider reviewing the source code of Hero and its dependencies to identify any suspicious code.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Stay informed about security advisories related to npm and JavaScript package supply chains.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Inject Malicious Script through User-Controlled Data Used in Transitions (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):

  • Attack Vector:
    • Application developers use user-provided data (e.g., from URL parameters, form inputs, cookies) to configure or control Hero transitions.
    • If this user-controlled data is not properly sanitized and validated, attackers can inject malicious JavaScript code.
    • Hero, when processing this unsanitized data, might execute the injected script within the user's browser, leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).
  • Potential Impact:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.
    • Attackers can execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the user's browser within the context of the application.
    • This can lead to session hijacking, cookie theft, defacement, redirection to malicious sites, data theft, and other malicious actions.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Sanitization and Validation: Crucially sanitize and validate ALL user-provided data before using it in Hero transition configurations.
    • Context-Aware Output Encoding: Encode user-provided data appropriately for the context where it's used within Hero transitions (e.g., HTML encoding, JavaScript encoding).
    • Avoid Direct DOM Manipulation with User Input: Minimize or eliminate direct DOM manipulation using user-controlled data within Hero configurations.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong Content Security Policy to mitigate the impact of XSS attacks by controlling the sources from which the browser is allowed to load resources and execute scripts.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Tamper with Transition State or Configuration (Critical Node):

  • Attack Vector:
    • Hero transitions are client-side JavaScript code.
    • Attackers can use browser developer tools or other client-side manipulation techniques to directly modify the state or configuration of Hero transitions running in the user's browser.
    • This manipulation can alter the intended behavior of the application related to transitions.
  • Potential Impact:
    • Bypass intended application logic or UI workflows that rely on Hero transitions.
    • Potentially disrupt application functionality or gain unauthorized access to features or data if application logic is not robustly designed.
    • While direct security breaches might be less likely if core security logic is server-side, it can still lead to unexpected behavior and potentially expose vulnerabilities if client-side logic is relied upon for security.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Assume Client-Side Code is Untrusted: Do not rely on Hero transitions or any client-side logic for security-critical operations or access control.
    • Server-Side Validation: Validate all security-sensitive actions and data on the server-side, regardless of client-side transition behavior.
    • Robust Application Logic: Design application logic to be resilient to client-side manipulation and not solely dependent on the correct execution of client-side transitions.
    • Security Audits: Conduct security audits to identify any application logic that might be vulnerable to client-side manipulation of transitions.