Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
184 lines (157 loc) · 13.9 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

184 lines (157 loc) · 13.9 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for johnlui/swift-on-ios

Objective: Compromise application using swift-on-ios by exploiting its weaknesses.

Attack Tree Visualization

└── Compromise Swift-on-iOS Application [CRITICAL NODE] ├── Exploit Embedded Vapor Server Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── Vapor Framework Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├── Outdated Vapor Version [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └── Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Older Vapor Version (e.g., CVEs) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └── Misconfiguration of Vapor Security Settings │ │ ├── Exposed Debug/Development Endpoints in Production │ │ │ └── Access sensitive information or administrative functions │ ├── Vulnerabilities in Custom Swift Server-Side Code [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├── Insecure API Endpoints [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├── Lack of Input Validation [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ └── Server-Side Injection Attacks (e.g., Command Injection, Path Traversal if file system access is involved) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├── Broken Authentication/Authorization [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├── Bypass Authentication Mechanisms [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ │ └── Gain unauthorized access to protected resources [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├── Privilege Escalation [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ │ └── Access resources beyond intended user privileges [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├── Data Storage Vulnerabilities (if server manages data) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├── Insecure Local Storage [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ └── Access or modify data stored by the Vapor server on the device's file system [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├── Lack of Encryption for Sensitive Data at Rest [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ └── Data breach if device is compromised or data is extracted [CRITICAL NODE] │ └── Supply Chain Vulnerabilities │ ├── Vulnerable Vapor Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └── Exploit known vulnerabilities in libraries used by Vapor (e.g., NIO, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├── Vulnerable Swift Packages used in Custom Server Code │ │ └── Exploit known vulnerabilities in third-party Swift packages [CRITICAL NODE] └── Social Engineering & Physical Access ├── Phishing or Malware to Install Malicious App Variant [CRITICAL NODE] │ └── Replace legitimate Swift-on-iOS app with a compromised version [CRITICAL NODE] ├── Physical Access to Device [CRITICAL NODE] │ └── Direct access to device data, debugging, or application manipulation [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 1: Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Older Vapor Version (CVEs)

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker identifies the Vapor version used by the application (e.g., through server headers, error messages, or reverse engineering).
    • Attacker searches for publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) associated with that specific Vapor version.
    • Attacker utilizes readily available exploit code or tools (like Metasploit modules) to exploit these vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Data Breach, Denial of Service)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly update Vapor and its dependencies to the latest stable versions.
    • Implement a dependency management process and monitor security advisories.
    • Use vulnerability scanning tools to detect outdated dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 2: Access sensitive information or administrative functions via Exposed Debug/Development Endpoints

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker discovers debug or development endpoints that were unintentionally left enabled in the production application.
    • Attacker accesses these endpoints through simple web requests or browsing.
    • These endpoints may expose sensitive configuration details, internal data, or even administrative functionalities that can be abused.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium-High (Information Disclosure, Potential Privilege Escalation)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strictly disable all debug and development endpoints in production builds.
    • Implement feature flags or environment-based configurations to control endpoint availability.
    • Automated checks in the build process to ensure debug endpoints are disabled in production.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 3: Server-Side Injection Attacks due to Lack of Input Validation

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker identifies API endpoints that do not properly validate user-supplied input.
    • Attacker crafts malicious input payloads designed to inject commands or manipulate server-side operations (e.g., Command Injection, Path Traversal if file system access is involved).
    • The server-side code executes the injected commands or operations, leading to unauthorized actions.
  • Likelihood: Medium-High
  • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Data Breach, File System Access, Denial of Service)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thoroughly validate and sanitize all user inputs at API endpoints.
    • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection (if database interaction is involved, though less common in this embedded context).
    • Avoid direct execution of user-controlled input as commands.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 4: Gain unauthorized access to protected resources via Bypass Authentication Mechanisms

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker identifies flaws in the application's authentication logic.
    • Attacker exploits these flaws to bypass authentication mechanisms, such as weak password policies, predictable session tokens, or logic errors in authentication checks.
    • Attacker gains unauthorized access to protected resources and functionalities without proper credentials.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Unauthorized Access to Data and Functionality)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust authentication mechanisms using established security libraries and patterns.
    • Enforce strong password policies.
    • Use secure session management practices.
    • Regularly security test authentication logic for bypass vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 5: Access resources beyond intended user privileges via Privilege Escalation

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker identifies vulnerabilities in the application's authorization logic or role-based access control.
    • Attacker exploits these vulnerabilities to escalate their privileges, gaining access to resources or functionalities intended for higher-privileged users (e.g., administrators).
    • This can be achieved through parameter manipulation, logic flaws, or insecure direct object references.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium-High (Access to Sensitive Data, Administrative Functions)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust authorization mechanisms and role-based access control.
    • Follow the principle of least privilege.
    • Thoroughly test authorization logic for privilege escalation vulnerabilities.
    • Monitor access logs for suspicious privilege escalation attempts.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 6: Access or modify data stored by the Vapor server on the device's file system due to Insecure Local Storage

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker gains physical or logical access to the iOS device (e.g., through malware, device theft, or jailbreaking).
    • Attacker locates data stored by the Vapor server in the device's file system.
    • If the data is stored insecurely (e.g., in plain text or easily accessible directories), the attacker can access, modify, or exfiltrate sensitive information.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium-High (Data Breach, Data Manipulation)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid storing sensitive data in local file system if possible.
    • If local storage is necessary, use secure storage mechanisms provided by iOS (like Keychain for credentials, or encrypted Core Data).
    • Encrypt sensitive data at rest if stored in files.
    • Restrict file system permissions to minimize access.

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 7: Data breach if device is compromised or data is extracted due to Lack of Encryption for Sensitive Data at Rest

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker gains physical or logical access to the iOS device.
    • Attacker extracts data from the device's storage (e.g., through device theft, forensic tools, or backups).
    • If sensitive data is not encrypted at rest, the attacker can easily access and read the data.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Data Breach)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Encrypt all sensitive data at rest.
    • Utilize iOS encryption features and APIs for data protection.
    • Consider full-disk encryption for the device itself (iOS default).

Attack Tree Path: High-Risk Path 8: Exploit known vulnerabilities in libraries used by Vapor (e.g., NIO, etc.) due to Vulnerable Vapor Dependencies

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker identifies vulnerable dependencies used by the Vapor framework (e.g., NIO, SwiftNIO, etc.).
    • Attacker searches for publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in these dependencies.
    • Attacker exploits these vulnerabilities, which can potentially impact the Vapor server and the application.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service, Data Breach depending on vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain an inventory of all Vapor dependencies.
    • Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities using vulnerability scanning tools.
    • Update dependencies promptly when security patches are released.
    • Automate dependency updates and vulnerability monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Exploit known vulnerabilities in third-party Swift packages used in Custom Server Code

  • Attack Vector:
    • Similar to Vapor dependencies, third-party Swift packages used in custom server code can contain vulnerabilities.
    • Attacker identifies vulnerable Swift packages and exploits known vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service, Data Breach depending on vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain an inventory of all third-party Swift packages used in custom server code.
    • Regularly scan these packages for known vulnerabilities.
    • Update packages promptly when security patches are released.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Replace legitimate Swift-on-iOS app with a compromised version via Phishing or Malware

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker uses social engineering techniques (phishing) or malware distribution to trick users into installing a malicious variant of the Swift-on-iOS application.
    • The compromised application can contain backdoors, spyware, or other malicious functionalities.
  • Likelihood: Low-Medium
  • Impact: Critical (Full Control over Application, Potential Device Compromise)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Distribute the app through official channels like the App Store.
    • Properly code sign the application to ensure integrity.
    • Educate users about phishing and the risks of installing apps from untrusted sources.

Attack Tree Path: Critical Node: Direct access to device data, debugging, or application manipulation via Physical Access to Device

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker gains physical access to the user's iOS device.
    • If the device is unlocked or has weak security settings, the attacker can directly access device data, application data, enable debugging features, or manipulate the application.
  • Likelihood: Low-Medium
  • Impact: Critical (Full Access to Device Data, Application Data, Potential Device Compromise)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Encourage users to enable strong device passcodes and biometric authentication.
    • Promote device security best practices to users.
    • Implement application-level security measures to protect sensitive data even if the device is compromised (e.g., data encryption, secure storage).