Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (42 loc) · 7.25 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

51 lines (42 loc) · 7.25 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for krzyzanowskim/cryptoswift

Attack Surface: Algorithm Implementation Flaws

  • Description: Bugs or vulnerabilities in the implementation of cryptographic algorithms within the CryptoSwift library itself.
    • How CryptoSwift contributes: CryptoSwift provides the code that implements cryptographic algorithms. Errors in this code directly lead to vulnerabilities.
    • Example: A coding error in CryptoSwift's implementation of the ChaCha20 cipher results in predictable keystream generation under certain conditions, allowing for decryption of encrypted data.
    • Impact: Complete compromise of confidentiality and/or integrity of data protected by the flawed algorithm. Potential for data decryption, forgery, or manipulation.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the severity and exploitability of the flaw and the algorithm affected).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use latest CryptoSwift version: Regularly update to the newest version of CryptoSwift to benefit from bug fixes and security patches that address implementation flaws.
      • Monitor CryptoSwift Security Advisories: Stay informed about any reported vulnerabilities and security advisories specifically related to CryptoSwift's algorithm implementations.
      • Consider alternative libraries (if critical flaws are found and unpatched): In the event of critical, unpatched vulnerabilities in core algorithms, evaluate switching to a different, well-vetted cryptographic library as a last resort.

Attack Surface: Padding Oracle Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from incorrect handling of padding in block cipher modes (like CBC with PKCS7 padding) within CryptoSwift, potentially allowing attackers to decrypt data by observing padding validation errors.
    • How CryptoSwift contributes: If CryptoSwift's padding implementation or its integration within cipher modes is flawed, it can directly create padding oracle vulnerabilities.
    • Example: CryptoSwift's AES-CBC decryption routine exhibits timing variations based on the validity of PKCS7 padding. An attacker can exploit these timing differences to iteratively decrypt ciphertext byte by byte.
    • Impact: Decryption of sensitive data without authorization through padding oracle attacks.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use authenticated encryption modes: Prioritize using authenticated encryption modes like AES-GCM or ChaChaPoly1305 offered by CryptoSwift, as these modes inherently avoid padding oracle vulnerabilities.
      • Careful review of CBC mode usage (if unavoidable): If CBC mode with padding is absolutely necessary, meticulously review and ideally audit the CryptoSwift code related to padding validation to ensure it is constant-time and resistant to oracle attacks.
      • Consider alternative padding schemes (with extreme caution): Explore alternative padding schemes only if PKCS7 is demonstrably problematic and with deep cryptographic expertise, ensuring the chosen scheme is cryptographically sound and correctly implemented within CryptoSwift's context.

Attack Surface: Weak or Predictable Random Number Generation (if provided by CryptoSwift)

  • Description: If CryptoSwift provides or relies on a weak or predictable random number generator (RNG) for cryptographic operations like key generation, IVs, or salts.
    • How CryptoSwift contributes: If CryptoSwift's library includes a flawed or poorly seeded RNG, or if it incorrectly utilizes system RNGs, it can lead to predictable cryptographic parameters.
    • Example: CryptoSwift includes a custom RNG implementation that is not cryptographically secure and is used for generating initialization vectors (IVs) for AES-CBC. These predictable IVs weaken the encryption and could lead to ciphertext predictability.
    • Impact: Compromise of confidentiality and/or integrity due to predictable keys or nonces resulting from a weak RNG.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the context and how the RNG is used and the degree of predictability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Verify CryptoSwift's RNG usage: Carefully examine CryptoSwift's documentation and source code to understand how it handles random number generation. Ensure it relies on secure system-provided RNGs (like SecRandomCopyBytes on Apple platforms) and not a custom, potentially flawed implementation.
      • If custom RNG is used, scrutinize its implementation: If CryptoSwift does include a custom RNG, thoroughly scrutinize its implementation for cryptographic soundness and proper seeding. Advocate for removal or replacement with system RNG if weaknesses are found.
      • Report potential RNG issues to CryptoSwift maintainers: If you identify potential weaknesses in CryptoSwift's RNG usage, report them to the library maintainers immediately.

Attack Surface: Compromised CryptoSwift Package (Supply Chain Vulnerability)

  • Description: The legitimate CryptoSwift package on package managers (like Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, Carthage) is replaced or modified with a malicious version without the knowledge of developers.
    • How CryptoSwift contributes: Dependency on CryptoSwift, like any external library, introduces supply chain risks. A compromised CryptoSwift package directly injects malicious code into applications using it.
    • Example: An attacker gains access to the Swift Package Manager repository and replaces the official CryptoSwift package with a backdoored version. Applications downloading this compromised package unknowingly include malicious code that could exfiltrate data or create vulnerabilities.
    • Impact: Wide-scale compromise of applications using the malicious CryptoSwift version, potentially leading to data breaches, malware distribution, and other severe consequences.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (due to potential for widespread and severe impact).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use dependency pinning/version locking: Specify exact, known-good versions of CryptoSwift in your project's dependency management files (e.g., Package.swift, Podfile, Cartfile). This prevents automatic updates to potentially compromised versions.
      • Verify package integrity (if possible): If package managers offer mechanisms to verify package integrity (e.g., checksums, signatures), utilize them to ensure the downloaded CryptoSwift package is authentic and untampered.
      • Monitor dependency security advisories: Stay informed about security advisories related to CryptoSwift and its dependencies from package managers, security communities, and CryptoSwift's own channels.
      • Consider using reputable package sources: Download CryptoSwift only from official and reputable package repositories to minimize the risk of encountering compromised packages.