Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
40 lines (33 loc) · 5.71 KB

File metadata and controls

40 lines (33 loc) · 5.71 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for mac-cain13/r.swift

  • Description: Compromise of the r.swift dependency itself, leading to injection of malicious code during the build process.
  • r.swift Contribution: r.swift is an external dependency integrated into the project. If the source or distribution of r.swift is compromised, malicious code can be introduced into the application through the generated R.swift file.
  • Example: An attacker gains access to the r.swift GitHub repository or its distribution channels and injects malicious code into the r.swift script. Developers unknowingly use this compromised version. During the build, the malicious code is embedded within the generated R.swift file and subsequently compiled into the application binary.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution within the application, data exfiltration, application backdoors, complete compromise of the application.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Verify Dependency Integrity: Utilize package managers (like CocoaPods, Carthage, or Swift Package Manager) that offer checksum verification to ensure the integrity of downloaded dependencies.
    • Pin Dependency Versions: Specify exact versions of r.swift in dependency management files to prevent automatic updates to potentially compromised versions.
    • Regularly Update and Monitor: Stay informed about security advisories related to r.swift and update to patched versions promptly. Monitor the official r.swift repository for any suspicious activity.
    • Code Review Dependency Updates: When updating r.swift, review the release notes and changes to ensure they are legitimate and from trusted sources.
  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in r.swift's resource file parsing logic by crafting malicious resource files.
  • r.swift Contribution: r.swift's core function is parsing resource files (storyboards, asset catalogs, etc.). Bugs in this parsing logic can be triggered by maliciously crafted resource files, leading to unexpected behavior during the build process.
  • Example: An attacker with write access to the project repository crafts a specially designed storyboard file that exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in r.swift's storyboard parsing code. When r.swift processes this malicious storyboard during the build, it could lead to code execution on the build machine or a denial of service by crashing the build process.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (build process disruption, preventing releases), potentially arbitrary code execution on the build machine (depending on the nature of the parsing vulnerability).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep r.swift Updated: Ensure you are using the latest version of r.swift as updates often include bug fixes and improvements to parsing robustness, addressing potential vulnerabilities.
    • Resource File Code Review: Implement code review processes for all changes to resource files, especially when contributions come from less trusted sources. Look for unusual or overly complex resource file structures that might be designed to exploit parsing weaknesses.
    • Restrict Resource File Access: Limit write access to resource files within the project repository to authorized personnel to reduce the risk of malicious resource files being introduced.
  • Description: Attackers compromise the build environment, manipulating the execution of the r.swift build script to inject malicious actions.
  • r.swift Contribution: r.swift is integrated as a build script within the Xcode project. A compromised build environment can be used to alter or replace the r.swift execution, leading to malicious code injection or other attacks during the build process.
  • Example: An attacker compromises a CI/CD server used for building the application. They modify the Xcode project file to alter the r.swift build script phase. This modified script now replaces the legitimate r.swift executable with a malicious one, or adds commands to execute before or after r.swift runs. This malicious script could then inject a backdoor into the application binary during the build process.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution on the build machine, injection of malicious code into the application binary (backdoors, malware), data theft from the build environment, compromised application releases.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Build Environments: Harden all build environments (developer machines, CI/CD systems). Implement strong access controls, regular security patching, and monitoring for suspicious activities.
    • Build Script Integrity Monitoring: Implement mechanisms to monitor and verify the integrity of build scripts, including the r.swift build script phase. Use version control and track changes to project files diligently.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Build Processes: Ensure build processes and the execution of r.swift run with the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid running build processes as root or administrator.
    • Isolated Build Environments: Use isolated build environments (e.g., containers, virtual machines) to limit the impact of a potential compromise of the build environment.